Cargando…

Gnana Laryngeal Airway in Clinical Practice: A Prospective Observational Study

OBJECTIVE: The Gnana Laryngeal Airway (GLA) device, a novel supraglottic airway device, is similar to the LMA-Classic in basic design, but with an additional suction port on the convex portion of the laryngeal mask to remove the saliva. We evaluated the GLA device in terms of ease and time to insert...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kapoor, Dheeraj, Singh, Jasveer, Mitra, Sukanya, Viswanath, Omar, Kaye, Alan David, Urits, Ivan, Orhurhu, Vwaire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864642
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2019.00243
_version_ 1783572129069924352
author Kapoor, Dheeraj
Singh, Jasveer
Mitra, Sukanya
Viswanath, Omar
Kaye, Alan David
Urits, Ivan
Orhurhu, Vwaire
author_facet Kapoor, Dheeraj
Singh, Jasveer
Mitra, Sukanya
Viswanath, Omar
Kaye, Alan David
Urits, Ivan
Orhurhu, Vwaire
author_sort Kapoor, Dheeraj
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Gnana Laryngeal Airway (GLA) device, a novel supraglottic airway device, is similar to the LMA-Classic in basic design, but with an additional suction port on the convex portion of the laryngeal mask to remove the saliva. We evaluated the GLA device in terms of ease and time to insertion, the number of attempts, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), correct placement, and complications in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures. METHODS: After general anaesthesia, the GLA device was inserted in ASA Class I–II consecutive patients aged 18–60 years, who were scheduled for elective surgeries lasting <2h. An independent observer noted (1) 10 consecutive successful GLA device insertions, all on the first attempt; (2) 10 consecutive device insertions, each <20 second in duration; and (3) 10 consecutive patients with the mean leak <10%. The criteria were fulfilled in 50 consecutive patients. RESULTS: In 72% of patients, the GLA device was successfully placed on the first attempt and was effortless in 64%. Between the first 10 and last 10 consecutive patients of the total 50, the ease-of-insertion grade progressively decreased (mean±standard deviation [SD]: 2.80±0.25 to 1.30±0.15, p<0.0001) and so did insertion time in seconds (28.70±1.87 to 14.20±0.79, p<0.0001). The post-insertion, OLP and airway compliance progressively increased, while the cuff inflation volume, peak airway pressure and airway resistance progressively decreased, along with minimal side effects and malposition. CONCLUSION: The GLA device insertion became progressively easier and faster; thus, such a device is promising and warrants further clinical evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7434353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74343532020-08-28 Gnana Laryngeal Airway in Clinical Practice: A Prospective Observational Study Kapoor, Dheeraj Singh, Jasveer Mitra, Sukanya Viswanath, Omar Kaye, Alan David Urits, Ivan Orhurhu, Vwaire Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim Original Article OBJECTIVE: The Gnana Laryngeal Airway (GLA) device, a novel supraglottic airway device, is similar to the LMA-Classic in basic design, but with an additional suction port on the convex portion of the laryngeal mask to remove the saliva. We evaluated the GLA device in terms of ease and time to insertion, the number of attempts, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), correct placement, and complications in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures. METHODS: After general anaesthesia, the GLA device was inserted in ASA Class I–II consecutive patients aged 18–60 years, who were scheduled for elective surgeries lasting <2h. An independent observer noted (1) 10 consecutive successful GLA device insertions, all on the first attempt; (2) 10 consecutive device insertions, each <20 second in duration; and (3) 10 consecutive patients with the mean leak <10%. The criteria were fulfilled in 50 consecutive patients. RESULTS: In 72% of patients, the GLA device was successfully placed on the first attempt and was effortless in 64%. Between the first 10 and last 10 consecutive patients of the total 50, the ease-of-insertion grade progressively decreased (mean±standard deviation [SD]: 2.80±0.25 to 1.30±0.15, p<0.0001) and so did insertion time in seconds (28.70±1.87 to 14.20±0.79, p<0.0001). The post-insertion, OLP and airway compliance progressively increased, while the cuff inflation volume, peak airway pressure and airway resistance progressively decreased, along with minimal side effects and malposition. CONCLUSION: The GLA device insertion became progressively easier and faster; thus, such a device is promising and warrants further clinical evaluation. Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society 2020-08 2019-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7434353/ /pubmed/32864642 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2019.00243 Text en © Copyright 2020 by Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Article
Kapoor, Dheeraj
Singh, Jasveer
Mitra, Sukanya
Viswanath, Omar
Kaye, Alan David
Urits, Ivan
Orhurhu, Vwaire
Gnana Laryngeal Airway in Clinical Practice: A Prospective Observational Study
title Gnana Laryngeal Airway in Clinical Practice: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Gnana Laryngeal Airway in Clinical Practice: A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Gnana Laryngeal Airway in Clinical Practice: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Gnana Laryngeal Airway in Clinical Practice: A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Gnana Laryngeal Airway in Clinical Practice: A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort gnana laryngeal airway in clinical practice: a prospective observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864642
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2019.00243
work_keys_str_mv AT kapoordheeraj gnanalaryngealairwayinclinicalpracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT singhjasveer gnanalaryngealairwayinclinicalpracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT mitrasukanya gnanalaryngealairwayinclinicalpracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT viswanathomar gnanalaryngealairwayinclinicalpracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kayealandavid gnanalaryngealairwayinclinicalpracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT uritsivan gnanalaryngealairwayinclinicalpracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT orhurhuvwaire gnanalaryngealairwayinclinicalpracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy