Cargando…

Laboratory verification of an RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2

BACKGROUND: Reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) is an extremely common clinical method for detecting pathogens, particularly for emerging infectious diseases such as the new coronavirus disease (COVID‐19). Currently, detection of the RNA from the novel coronavirus SARS‐CoV‐2 is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Yingping, Xu, Wei, Zhu, Zhiqiang, Xia, Xiaoping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7435359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23507
_version_ 1783572321176387584
author Wu, Yingping
Xu, Wei
Zhu, Zhiqiang
Xia, Xiaoping
author_facet Wu, Yingping
Xu, Wei
Zhu, Zhiqiang
Xia, Xiaoping
author_sort Wu, Yingping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) is an extremely common clinical method for detecting pathogens, particularly for emerging infectious diseases such as the new coronavirus disease (COVID‐19). Currently, detection of the RNA from the novel coronavirus SARS‐CoV‐2 is the gold standard for establishing a COVID‐19 diagnosis. This study evaluates the characteristic performance of the analytical system in a clinical laboratory. METHODS: A commercial SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA RT‐PCR Kit used in a clinical laboratory is assessed based on ISO 15189 verification requirements. A multiple real‐time RT‐PCR assay for the RdRP, N, and E genes in SARS‐CoV‐2 is verified. RESULTS: The analytical system exhibits good analytical sensitivity (1000 copies/mL) and specificity (100%); however, the values of 86.7% and 100% for analytical accuracy deserved attention, compared with two other types of methods. Overall, the kit is potentially useful for SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnostic testing and meets the verification requirements. CONCLUSION: Compliance with international standards, such as ISO 15189, is valuable for clinical laboratories and for improving laboratory medicine quality and safety. Normalization is essential for obtaining reliable results from the SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA RT‐PCR assay. This study aims to develop an improved SARS‐CoV‐2 verification framework compared with traditional molecular diagnostic methods, given the urgency of implementing new assays in clinical laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7435359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74353592020-08-19 Laboratory verification of an RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2 Wu, Yingping Xu, Wei Zhu, Zhiqiang Xia, Xiaoping J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: Reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) is an extremely common clinical method for detecting pathogens, particularly for emerging infectious diseases such as the new coronavirus disease (COVID‐19). Currently, detection of the RNA from the novel coronavirus SARS‐CoV‐2 is the gold standard for establishing a COVID‐19 diagnosis. This study evaluates the characteristic performance of the analytical system in a clinical laboratory. METHODS: A commercial SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA RT‐PCR Kit used in a clinical laboratory is assessed based on ISO 15189 verification requirements. A multiple real‐time RT‐PCR assay for the RdRP, N, and E genes in SARS‐CoV‐2 is verified. RESULTS: The analytical system exhibits good analytical sensitivity (1000 copies/mL) and specificity (100%); however, the values of 86.7% and 100% for analytical accuracy deserved attention, compared with two other types of methods. Overall, the kit is potentially useful for SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnostic testing and meets the verification requirements. CONCLUSION: Compliance with international standards, such as ISO 15189, is valuable for clinical laboratories and for improving laboratory medicine quality and safety. Normalization is essential for obtaining reliable results from the SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA RT‐PCR assay. This study aims to develop an improved SARS‐CoV‐2 verification framework compared with traditional molecular diagnostic methods, given the urgency of implementing new assays in clinical laboratories. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7435359/ /pubmed/32754967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23507 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Wu, Yingping
Xu, Wei
Zhu, Zhiqiang
Xia, Xiaoping
Laboratory verification of an RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2
title Laboratory verification of an RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2
title_full Laboratory verification of an RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2
title_fullStr Laboratory verification of an RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory verification of an RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2
title_short Laboratory verification of an RT‐PCR assay for SARS‐CoV‐2
title_sort laboratory verification of an rt‐pcr assay for sars‐cov‐2
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7435359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23507
work_keys_str_mv AT wuyingping laboratoryverificationofanrtpcrassayforsarscov2
AT xuwei laboratoryverificationofanrtpcrassayforsarscov2
AT zhuzhiqiang laboratoryverificationofanrtpcrassayforsarscov2
AT xiaxiaoping laboratoryverificationofanrtpcrassayforsarscov2