Cargando…

Landscape of Participant-Centric Initiatives for Medical Research in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Information and communication technology (ICT) has made remarkable progress in recent years and is being increasingly applied to medical research. This technology has the potential to facilitate the active involvement of research participants. Digital platforms that enable participants t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamakawa, Nao, Nakano, Rumiko, Kogetsu, Atsushi, Coathup, Victoria, Kaye, Jane, Yamamoto, Beverley Anne, Kato, Kazuto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7435629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32749228
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16441
_version_ 1783572366720237568
author Hamakawa, Nao
Nakano, Rumiko
Kogetsu, Atsushi
Coathup, Victoria
Kaye, Jane
Yamamoto, Beverley Anne
Kato, Kazuto
author_facet Hamakawa, Nao
Nakano, Rumiko
Kogetsu, Atsushi
Coathup, Victoria
Kaye, Jane
Yamamoto, Beverley Anne
Kato, Kazuto
author_sort Hamakawa, Nao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Information and communication technology (ICT) has made remarkable progress in recent years and is being increasingly applied to medical research. This technology has the potential to facilitate the active involvement of research participants. Digital platforms that enable participants to be involved in the research process are called participant-centric initiatives (PCIs). Several PCIs have been reported in the literature, but no scoping reviews have been carried out. Moreover, detailed methods and features to aid in developing a clear definition of PCIs have not been sufficiently elucidated to date. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review is to describe the recent trends in, and features of, PCIs across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan. METHODS: We applied a methodology suggested by Levac et al to conduct this scoping review. We searched electronic databases—MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Embase (Excerpta Medica Database), CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature), PsycINFO, and Ichushi-Web—and sources of grey literature, as well as internet search engines—Google and Bing. We hand-searched through key journals and reference lists of the relevant articles. Medical research using ICT was eligible for inclusion if there was a description of the active involvement of the participants. RESULTS: Ultimately, 21 PCIs were identified that have implemented practical methods and modes of various communication activities, such as patient forums and use of social media, in the field of medical research. Various methods of decision making that enable participants to become involved in setting the agenda were also evident. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review is the first study to analyze the detailed features of PCIs and how they are being implemented. By clarifying the modes and methods of various forms of communication and decision making with patients, this review contributes to a better understanding of patient-centric involvement, which can be facilitated by PCIs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.7407
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7435629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74356292020-08-31 Landscape of Participant-Centric Initiatives for Medical Research in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan: Scoping Review Hamakawa, Nao Nakano, Rumiko Kogetsu, Atsushi Coathup, Victoria Kaye, Jane Yamamoto, Beverley Anne Kato, Kazuto J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Information and communication technology (ICT) has made remarkable progress in recent years and is being increasingly applied to medical research. This technology has the potential to facilitate the active involvement of research participants. Digital platforms that enable participants to be involved in the research process are called participant-centric initiatives (PCIs). Several PCIs have been reported in the literature, but no scoping reviews have been carried out. Moreover, detailed methods and features to aid in developing a clear definition of PCIs have not been sufficiently elucidated to date. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review is to describe the recent trends in, and features of, PCIs across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan. METHODS: We applied a methodology suggested by Levac et al to conduct this scoping review. We searched electronic databases—MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Embase (Excerpta Medica Database), CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature), PsycINFO, and Ichushi-Web—and sources of grey literature, as well as internet search engines—Google and Bing. We hand-searched through key journals and reference lists of the relevant articles. Medical research using ICT was eligible for inclusion if there was a description of the active involvement of the participants. RESULTS: Ultimately, 21 PCIs were identified that have implemented practical methods and modes of various communication activities, such as patient forums and use of social media, in the field of medical research. Various methods of decision making that enable participants to become involved in setting the agenda were also evident. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review is the first study to analyze the detailed features of PCIs and how they are being implemented. By clarifying the modes and methods of various forms of communication and decision making with patients, this review contributes to a better understanding of patient-centric involvement, which can be facilitated by PCIs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.7407 JMIR Publications 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7435629/ /pubmed/32749228 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16441 Text en ©Nao Hamakawa, Rumiko Nakano, Atsushi Kogetsu, Victoria Coathup, Jane Kaye, Beverley Anne Yamamoto, Kazuto Kato. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 04.08.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hamakawa, Nao
Nakano, Rumiko
Kogetsu, Atsushi
Coathup, Victoria
Kaye, Jane
Yamamoto, Beverley Anne
Kato, Kazuto
Landscape of Participant-Centric Initiatives for Medical Research in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan: Scoping Review
title Landscape of Participant-Centric Initiatives for Medical Research in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan: Scoping Review
title_full Landscape of Participant-Centric Initiatives for Medical Research in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan: Scoping Review
title_fullStr Landscape of Participant-Centric Initiatives for Medical Research in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan: Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Landscape of Participant-Centric Initiatives for Medical Research in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan: Scoping Review
title_short Landscape of Participant-Centric Initiatives for Medical Research in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan: Scoping Review
title_sort landscape of participant-centric initiatives for medical research in the united states, the united kingdom, and japan: scoping review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7435629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32749228
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16441
work_keys_str_mv AT hamakawanao landscapeofparticipantcentricinitiativesformedicalresearchintheunitedstatestheunitedkingdomandjapanscopingreview
AT nakanorumiko landscapeofparticipantcentricinitiativesformedicalresearchintheunitedstatestheunitedkingdomandjapanscopingreview
AT kogetsuatsushi landscapeofparticipantcentricinitiativesformedicalresearchintheunitedstatestheunitedkingdomandjapanscopingreview
AT coathupvictoria landscapeofparticipantcentricinitiativesformedicalresearchintheunitedstatestheunitedkingdomandjapanscopingreview
AT kayejane landscapeofparticipantcentricinitiativesformedicalresearchintheunitedstatestheunitedkingdomandjapanscopingreview
AT yamamotobeverleyanne landscapeofparticipantcentricinitiativesformedicalresearchintheunitedstatestheunitedkingdomandjapanscopingreview
AT katokazuto landscapeofparticipantcentricinitiativesformedicalresearchintheunitedstatestheunitedkingdomandjapanscopingreview