Cargando…

Validation of an IMU Suit for Military-Based Tasks

Investigating the effects of load carriage on military soldiers using optical motion capture is challenging. However, inertial measurement units (IMUs) provide a promising alternative. Our purpose was to compare optical motion capture with an Xsens IMU system in terms of movement reconstruction usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mavor, Matthew P., Ross, Gwyneth B., Clouthier, Allison L., Karakolis, Thomas, Graham, Ryan B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7435666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20154280
_version_ 1783572375303880704
author Mavor, Matthew P.
Ross, Gwyneth B.
Clouthier, Allison L.
Karakolis, Thomas
Graham, Ryan B.
author_facet Mavor, Matthew P.
Ross, Gwyneth B.
Clouthier, Allison L.
Karakolis, Thomas
Graham, Ryan B.
author_sort Mavor, Matthew P.
collection PubMed
description Investigating the effects of load carriage on military soldiers using optical motion capture is challenging. However, inertial measurement units (IMUs) provide a promising alternative. Our purpose was to compare optical motion capture with an Xsens IMU system in terms of movement reconstruction using principal component analysis (PCA) using correlation coefficients and joint kinematics using root mean squared error (RMSE). Eighteen civilians performed military-type movements while their motion was recorded using both optical and IMU-based systems. Tasks included walking, running, and transitioning between running, kneeling, and prone positions. PCA was applied to both the optical and virtual IMU markers, and the correlations between the principal component (PC) scores were assessed. Full-body joint angles were calculated and compared using RMSE between optical markers, IMU data, and virtual markers generated from IMU data with and without coordinate system alignment. There was good agreement in movement reconstruction using PCA; the average correlation coefficient was 0.81 ± 0.14. RMSE values between the optical markers and IMU data for flexion-extension were less than 9°, and 15° for the lower and upper limbs, respectively, across all tasks. The underlying biomechanical model and associated coordinate systems appear to influence RMSE values the most. The IMU system appears appropriate for capturing and reconstructing full-body motion variability for military-based movements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7435666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74356662020-08-28 Validation of an IMU Suit for Military-Based Tasks Mavor, Matthew P. Ross, Gwyneth B. Clouthier, Allison L. Karakolis, Thomas Graham, Ryan B. Sensors (Basel) Article Investigating the effects of load carriage on military soldiers using optical motion capture is challenging. However, inertial measurement units (IMUs) provide a promising alternative. Our purpose was to compare optical motion capture with an Xsens IMU system in terms of movement reconstruction using principal component analysis (PCA) using correlation coefficients and joint kinematics using root mean squared error (RMSE). Eighteen civilians performed military-type movements while their motion was recorded using both optical and IMU-based systems. Tasks included walking, running, and transitioning between running, kneeling, and prone positions. PCA was applied to both the optical and virtual IMU markers, and the correlations between the principal component (PC) scores were assessed. Full-body joint angles were calculated and compared using RMSE between optical markers, IMU data, and virtual markers generated from IMU data with and without coordinate system alignment. There was good agreement in movement reconstruction using PCA; the average correlation coefficient was 0.81 ± 0.14. RMSE values between the optical markers and IMU data for flexion-extension were less than 9°, and 15° for the lower and upper limbs, respectively, across all tasks. The underlying biomechanical model and associated coordinate systems appear to influence RMSE values the most. The IMU system appears appropriate for capturing and reconstructing full-body motion variability for military-based movements. MDPI 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7435666/ /pubmed/32751920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20154280 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mavor, Matthew P.
Ross, Gwyneth B.
Clouthier, Allison L.
Karakolis, Thomas
Graham, Ryan B.
Validation of an IMU Suit for Military-Based Tasks
title Validation of an IMU Suit for Military-Based Tasks
title_full Validation of an IMU Suit for Military-Based Tasks
title_fullStr Validation of an IMU Suit for Military-Based Tasks
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an IMU Suit for Military-Based Tasks
title_short Validation of an IMU Suit for Military-Based Tasks
title_sort validation of an imu suit for military-based tasks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7435666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20154280
work_keys_str_mv AT mavormatthewp validationofanimusuitformilitarybasedtasks
AT rossgwynethb validationofanimusuitformilitarybasedtasks
AT clouthierallisonl validationofanimusuitformilitarybasedtasks
AT karakolisthomas validationofanimusuitformilitarybasedtasks
AT grahamryanb validationofanimusuitformilitarybasedtasks