Cargando…
Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review
Finite element (FE) models are widely used to investigate the biomechanics of reconstructed premolars. However, parameter identification is a complex step because experimental validation cannot always be conducted. The aim of this study was to collect the experimentally validated FE models of premol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13153280 |
_version_ | 1783572457661136896 |
---|---|
author | Richert, Raphaël Farges, Jean-Christophe Tamimi, Faleh Naouar, Naim Boisse, Philippe Ducret, Maxime |
author_facet | Richert, Raphaël Farges, Jean-Christophe Tamimi, Faleh Naouar, Naim Boisse, Philippe Ducret, Maxime |
author_sort | Richert, Raphaël |
collection | PubMed |
description | Finite element (FE) models are widely used to investigate the biomechanics of reconstructed premolars. However, parameter identification is a complex step because experimental validation cannot always be conducted. The aim of this study was to collect the experimentally validated FE models of premolars, extract their parameters, and discuss trends. A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Records were identified in three electronic databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], Scopus, The Cochrane Library) by two independent reviewers. Twenty-seven parameters dealing with failure criteria, model construction, material laws, boundary conditions, and model validation were extracted from the included articles. From 1306 records, 214 were selected for eligibility and entirely read. Among them, 19 studies were included. A heterogeneity was observed for several parameters associated with failure criteria and model construction. Elasticity, linearity, and isotropy were more often chosen for dental and periodontal tissues with a Young’s modulus mostly set at 18–18.6 GPa for dentine. Loading was mainly simulated by an axial force, and FE models were mostly validated by in vitro tests evaluating tooth strains, but different conditions about experiment type, sample size, and tooth status (intact or restored) were reported. In conclusion, material laws identified herein could be applied to future premolar FE models. However, further investigations such as sensitivity analysis are required for several parameters to clarify their indication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7436020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74360202020-08-24 Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review Richert, Raphaël Farges, Jean-Christophe Tamimi, Faleh Naouar, Naim Boisse, Philippe Ducret, Maxime Materials (Basel) Review Finite element (FE) models are widely used to investigate the biomechanics of reconstructed premolars. However, parameter identification is a complex step because experimental validation cannot always be conducted. The aim of this study was to collect the experimentally validated FE models of premolars, extract their parameters, and discuss trends. A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Records were identified in three electronic databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], Scopus, The Cochrane Library) by two independent reviewers. Twenty-seven parameters dealing with failure criteria, model construction, material laws, boundary conditions, and model validation were extracted from the included articles. From 1306 records, 214 were selected for eligibility and entirely read. Among them, 19 studies were included. A heterogeneity was observed for several parameters associated with failure criteria and model construction. Elasticity, linearity, and isotropy were more often chosen for dental and periodontal tissues with a Young’s modulus mostly set at 18–18.6 GPa for dentine. Loading was mainly simulated by an axial force, and FE models were mostly validated by in vitro tests evaluating tooth strains, but different conditions about experiment type, sample size, and tooth status (intact or restored) were reported. In conclusion, material laws identified herein could be applied to future premolar FE models. However, further investigations such as sensitivity analysis are required for several parameters to clarify their indication. MDPI 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7436020/ /pubmed/32717945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13153280 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Richert, Raphaël Farges, Jean-Christophe Tamimi, Faleh Naouar, Naim Boisse, Philippe Ducret, Maxime Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review |
title | Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | validated finite element models of premolars: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13153280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richertraphael validatedfiniteelementmodelsofpremolarsascopingreview AT fargesjeanchristophe validatedfiniteelementmodelsofpremolarsascopingreview AT tamimifaleh validatedfiniteelementmodelsofpremolarsascopingreview AT naouarnaim validatedfiniteelementmodelsofpremolarsascopingreview AT boissephilippe validatedfiniteelementmodelsofpremolarsascopingreview AT ducretmaxime validatedfiniteelementmodelsofpremolarsascopingreview |