Cargando…

Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review

Finite element (FE) models are widely used to investigate the biomechanics of reconstructed premolars. However, parameter identification is a complex step because experimental validation cannot always be conducted. The aim of this study was to collect the experimentally validated FE models of premol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richert, Raphaël, Farges, Jean-Christophe, Tamimi, Faleh, Naouar, Naim, Boisse, Philippe, Ducret, Maxime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13153280
_version_ 1783572457661136896
author Richert, Raphaël
Farges, Jean-Christophe
Tamimi, Faleh
Naouar, Naim
Boisse, Philippe
Ducret, Maxime
author_facet Richert, Raphaël
Farges, Jean-Christophe
Tamimi, Faleh
Naouar, Naim
Boisse, Philippe
Ducret, Maxime
author_sort Richert, Raphaël
collection PubMed
description Finite element (FE) models are widely used to investigate the biomechanics of reconstructed premolars. However, parameter identification is a complex step because experimental validation cannot always be conducted. The aim of this study was to collect the experimentally validated FE models of premolars, extract their parameters, and discuss trends. A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Records were identified in three electronic databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], Scopus, The Cochrane Library) by two independent reviewers. Twenty-seven parameters dealing with failure criteria, model construction, material laws, boundary conditions, and model validation were extracted from the included articles. From 1306 records, 214 were selected for eligibility and entirely read. Among them, 19 studies were included. A heterogeneity was observed for several parameters associated with failure criteria and model construction. Elasticity, linearity, and isotropy were more often chosen for dental and periodontal tissues with a Young’s modulus mostly set at 18–18.6 GPa for dentine. Loading was mainly simulated by an axial force, and FE models were mostly validated by in vitro tests evaluating tooth strains, but different conditions about experiment type, sample size, and tooth status (intact or restored) were reported. In conclusion, material laws identified herein could be applied to future premolar FE models. However, further investigations such as sensitivity analysis are required for several parameters to clarify their indication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7436020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74360202020-08-24 Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review Richert, Raphaël Farges, Jean-Christophe Tamimi, Faleh Naouar, Naim Boisse, Philippe Ducret, Maxime Materials (Basel) Review Finite element (FE) models are widely used to investigate the biomechanics of reconstructed premolars. However, parameter identification is a complex step because experimental validation cannot always be conducted. The aim of this study was to collect the experimentally validated FE models of premolars, extract their parameters, and discuss trends. A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Records were identified in three electronic databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], Scopus, The Cochrane Library) by two independent reviewers. Twenty-seven parameters dealing with failure criteria, model construction, material laws, boundary conditions, and model validation were extracted from the included articles. From 1306 records, 214 were selected for eligibility and entirely read. Among them, 19 studies were included. A heterogeneity was observed for several parameters associated with failure criteria and model construction. Elasticity, linearity, and isotropy were more often chosen for dental and periodontal tissues with a Young’s modulus mostly set at 18–18.6 GPa for dentine. Loading was mainly simulated by an axial force, and FE models were mostly validated by in vitro tests evaluating tooth strains, but different conditions about experiment type, sample size, and tooth status (intact or restored) were reported. In conclusion, material laws identified herein could be applied to future premolar FE models. However, further investigations such as sensitivity analysis are required for several parameters to clarify their indication. MDPI 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7436020/ /pubmed/32717945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13153280 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Richert, Raphaël
Farges, Jean-Christophe
Tamimi, Faleh
Naouar, Naim
Boisse, Philippe
Ducret, Maxime
Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review
title Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review
title_full Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review
title_short Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review
title_sort validated finite element models of premolars: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13153280
work_keys_str_mv AT richertraphael validatedfiniteelementmodelsofpremolarsascopingreview
AT fargesjeanchristophe validatedfiniteelementmodelsofpremolarsascopingreview
AT tamimifaleh validatedfiniteelementmodelsofpremolarsascopingreview
AT naouarnaim validatedfiniteelementmodelsofpremolarsascopingreview
AT boissephilippe validatedfiniteelementmodelsofpremolarsascopingreview
AT ducretmaxime validatedfiniteelementmodelsofpremolarsascopingreview