Cargando…

Non-Contact Evaluation of Pigs’ Body Temperature Incorporating Environmental Factors

Internal body temperature is the gold standard for the fever of pigs, however non-contact infrared imaging technology (IRT) can only measure the skin temperature of regions of interest (ROI). Therefore, using IRT to detect the internal body temperature should be based on a correlation model between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Guifeng, Li, Wei, Meng, Junyu, Tan, Hequn, Feng, Yaoze
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32752074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20154282
_version_ 1783572497707302912
author Jia, Guifeng
Li, Wei
Meng, Junyu
Tan, Hequn
Feng, Yaoze
author_facet Jia, Guifeng
Li, Wei
Meng, Junyu
Tan, Hequn
Feng, Yaoze
author_sort Jia, Guifeng
collection PubMed
description Internal body temperature is the gold standard for the fever of pigs, however non-contact infrared imaging technology (IRT) can only measure the skin temperature of regions of interest (ROI). Therefore, using IRT to detect the internal body temperature should be based on a correlation model between the ROI temperature and the internal temperature. When heat exchange between the ROI and the surroundings makes the ROI temperature more correlated with the environment, merely depending on the ROI to predict the internal temperature is unreliable. To ensure a high prediction accuracy, this paper investigated the influence of air temperature and humidity on ROI temperature, then built a prediction model incorporating them. The animal test includes 18 swine. IRT was employed to collect the temperatures of the backside, eye, vulva, and ear root ROIs; meanwhile, the air temperature and humidity were recorded. Body temperature prediction models incorporating environmental factors and the ROI temperature were constructed based on Back Propagate Neural Net (BPNN), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Regression (SVR). All three models yielded better results regarding the maximum error, minimum error, and mean square error (MSE) when the environmental factors were considered. When environmental factors were incorporated, SVR produced the best outcome, with the maximum error at 0.478 °C, the minimum error at 0.124 °C, and the MSE at 0.159 °C. The result demonstrated the accuracy and applicability of SVR as a prediction model of pigs′ internal body temperature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7436203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74362032020-08-24 Non-Contact Evaluation of Pigs’ Body Temperature Incorporating Environmental Factors Jia, Guifeng Li, Wei Meng, Junyu Tan, Hequn Feng, Yaoze Sensors (Basel) Article Internal body temperature is the gold standard for the fever of pigs, however non-contact infrared imaging technology (IRT) can only measure the skin temperature of regions of interest (ROI). Therefore, using IRT to detect the internal body temperature should be based on a correlation model between the ROI temperature and the internal temperature. When heat exchange between the ROI and the surroundings makes the ROI temperature more correlated with the environment, merely depending on the ROI to predict the internal temperature is unreliable. To ensure a high prediction accuracy, this paper investigated the influence of air temperature and humidity on ROI temperature, then built a prediction model incorporating them. The animal test includes 18 swine. IRT was employed to collect the temperatures of the backside, eye, vulva, and ear root ROIs; meanwhile, the air temperature and humidity were recorded. Body temperature prediction models incorporating environmental factors and the ROI temperature were constructed based on Back Propagate Neural Net (BPNN), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Regression (SVR). All three models yielded better results regarding the maximum error, minimum error, and mean square error (MSE) when the environmental factors were considered. When environmental factors were incorporated, SVR produced the best outcome, with the maximum error at 0.478 °C, the minimum error at 0.124 °C, and the MSE at 0.159 °C. The result demonstrated the accuracy and applicability of SVR as a prediction model of pigs′ internal body temperature. MDPI 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7436203/ /pubmed/32752074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20154282 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jia, Guifeng
Li, Wei
Meng, Junyu
Tan, Hequn
Feng, Yaoze
Non-Contact Evaluation of Pigs’ Body Temperature Incorporating Environmental Factors
title Non-Contact Evaluation of Pigs’ Body Temperature Incorporating Environmental Factors
title_full Non-Contact Evaluation of Pigs’ Body Temperature Incorporating Environmental Factors
title_fullStr Non-Contact Evaluation of Pigs’ Body Temperature Incorporating Environmental Factors
title_full_unstemmed Non-Contact Evaluation of Pigs’ Body Temperature Incorporating Environmental Factors
title_short Non-Contact Evaluation of Pigs’ Body Temperature Incorporating Environmental Factors
title_sort non-contact evaluation of pigs’ body temperature incorporating environmental factors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32752074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20154282
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaguifeng noncontactevaluationofpigsbodytemperatureincorporatingenvironmentalfactors
AT liwei noncontactevaluationofpigsbodytemperatureincorporatingenvironmentalfactors
AT mengjunyu noncontactevaluationofpigsbodytemperatureincorporatingenvironmentalfactors
AT tanhequn noncontactevaluationofpigsbodytemperatureincorporatingenvironmentalfactors
AT fengyaoze noncontactevaluationofpigsbodytemperatureincorporatingenvironmentalfactors