Cargando…
Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards?
The current SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic particularly endangers older people with pre‐existing cardiopulmonary and metabolic conditions. However, it is also currently under discussion whether patients under immunosuppressive therapy also have a higher risk of suffering a severe course of the COVID‐19 disease...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddg.14194 |
_version_ | 1783572523801116672 |
---|---|
author | Grabbe, Stephan Beissert, Stefan Enk, Alexander |
author_facet | Grabbe, Stephan Beissert, Stefan Enk, Alexander |
author_sort | Grabbe, Stephan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic particularly endangers older people with pre‐existing cardiopulmonary and metabolic conditions. However, it is also currently under discussion whether patients under immunosuppressive therapy also have a higher risk of suffering a severe course of the COVID‐19 disease. In principle though, there is currently no data available for a general reduction or pause of immunosuppression in patients with autoimmune diseases because of the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. However, since there is currently neither an effective therapy nor corresponding vaccination protection, the indication for a prolonged immunosuppressive therapy should be made with special care. In particular, immunotherapeutic agents that produce long‐term effects (e.g., rituximab) should be used with special caution. In contrast, immunomodulating substances that do not suppress antiviral immunity (e.g. systemic immunoglobulins, doxycycline), or that have intrinsic effects on SARS‐CoV‐2 (calcineurin inhibitors, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine) may be useful alternatives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7436367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74363672020-08-19 Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards? Grabbe, Stephan Beissert, Stefan Enk, Alexander J Dtsch Dermatol Ges Review The current SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic particularly endangers older people with pre‐existing cardiopulmonary and metabolic conditions. However, it is also currently under discussion whether patients under immunosuppressive therapy also have a higher risk of suffering a severe course of the COVID‐19 disease. In principle though, there is currently no data available for a general reduction or pause of immunosuppression in patients with autoimmune diseases because of the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. However, since there is currently neither an effective therapy nor corresponding vaccination protection, the indication for a prolonged immunosuppressive therapy should be made with special care. In particular, immunotherapeutic agents that produce long‐term effects (e.g., rituximab) should be used with special caution. In contrast, immunomodulating substances that do not suppress antiviral immunity (e.g. systemic immunoglobulins, doxycycline), or that have intrinsic effects on SARS‐CoV‐2 (calcineurin inhibitors, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine) may be useful alternatives. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-02 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7436367/ /pubmed/32743938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddg.14194 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Grabbe, Stephan Beissert, Stefan Enk, Alexander Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards? |
title | Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards? |
title_full | Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards? |
title_fullStr | Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards? |
title_full_unstemmed | Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards? |
title_short | Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards? |
title_sort | systemic immunosuppression in times of covid‐19: do we need to rethink our standards? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddg.14194 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grabbestephan systemicimmunosuppressionintimesofcovid19doweneedtorethinkourstandards AT beissertstefan systemicimmunosuppressionintimesofcovid19doweneedtorethinkourstandards AT enkalexander systemicimmunosuppressionintimesofcovid19doweneedtorethinkourstandards |