Cargando…

Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards?

The current SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic particularly endangers older people with pre‐existing cardiopulmonary and metabolic conditions. However, it is also currently under discussion whether patients under immunosuppressive therapy also have a higher risk of suffering a severe course of the COVID‐19 disease...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grabbe, Stephan, Beissert, Stefan, Enk, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddg.14194
_version_ 1783572523801116672
author Grabbe, Stephan
Beissert, Stefan
Enk, Alexander
author_facet Grabbe, Stephan
Beissert, Stefan
Enk, Alexander
author_sort Grabbe, Stephan
collection PubMed
description The current SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic particularly endangers older people with pre‐existing cardiopulmonary and metabolic conditions. However, it is also currently under discussion whether patients under immunosuppressive therapy also have a higher risk of suffering a severe course of the COVID‐19 disease. In principle though, there is currently no data available for a general reduction or pause of immunosuppression in patients with autoimmune diseases because of the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. However, since there is currently neither an effective therapy nor corresponding vaccination protection, the indication for a prolonged immunosuppressive therapy should be made with special care. In particular, immunotherapeutic agents that produce long‐term effects (e.g., rituximab) should be used with special caution. In contrast, immunomodulating substances that do not suppress antiviral immunity (e.g. systemic immunoglobulins, doxycycline), or that have intrinsic effects on SARS‐CoV‐2 (calcineurin inhibitors, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine) may be useful alternatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7436367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74363672020-08-19 Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards? Grabbe, Stephan Beissert, Stefan Enk, Alexander J Dtsch Dermatol Ges Review The current SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic particularly endangers older people with pre‐existing cardiopulmonary and metabolic conditions. However, it is also currently under discussion whether patients under immunosuppressive therapy also have a higher risk of suffering a severe course of the COVID‐19 disease. In principle though, there is currently no data available for a general reduction or pause of immunosuppression in patients with autoimmune diseases because of the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. However, since there is currently neither an effective therapy nor corresponding vaccination protection, the indication for a prolonged immunosuppressive therapy should be made with special care. In particular, immunotherapeutic agents that produce long‐term effects (e.g., rituximab) should be used with special caution. In contrast, immunomodulating substances that do not suppress antiviral immunity (e.g. systemic immunoglobulins, doxycycline), or that have intrinsic effects on SARS‐CoV‐2 (calcineurin inhibitors, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine) may be useful alternatives. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-02 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7436367/ /pubmed/32743938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddg.14194 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review
Grabbe, Stephan
Beissert, Stefan
Enk, Alexander
Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards?
title Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards?
title_full Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards?
title_fullStr Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards?
title_full_unstemmed Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards?
title_short Systemic immunosuppression in times of COVID‐19: Do we need to rethink our standards?
title_sort systemic immunosuppression in times of covid‐19: do we need to rethink our standards?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddg.14194
work_keys_str_mv AT grabbestephan systemicimmunosuppressionintimesofcovid19doweneedtorethinkourstandards
AT beissertstefan systemicimmunosuppressionintimesofcovid19doweneedtorethinkourstandards
AT enkalexander systemicimmunosuppressionintimesofcovid19doweneedtorethinkourstandards