Cargando…

What Drives Successful Administrative Performance during Crises? Lessons from Refugee Migration and the Covid‐19 Pandemic

The Covid‐19 pandemic affects societies worldwide, challenging not only health sectors but also public administration systems in general. Understanding why public administrations perform well in the current situation—and in times of crisis more generally—is theoretically of great importance, and ide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schomaker, Rahel M., Bauer, Michael W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32836467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.13280
_version_ 1783572529643782144
author Schomaker, Rahel M.
Bauer, Michael W.
author_facet Schomaker, Rahel M.
Bauer, Michael W.
author_sort Schomaker, Rahel M.
collection PubMed
description The Covid‐19 pandemic affects societies worldwide, challenging not only health sectors but also public administration systems in general. Understanding why public administrations perform well in the current situation—and in times of crisis more generally—is theoretically of great importance, and identifying concrete factors driving successful administrative performance under today's extraordinary circumstances could still improve current crisis responses. This article studies patterns of sound administrative performance with a focus on networks and knowledge management within and between crises. Subsequently, it draws on empirical evidence from two recent public administration surveys conducted in Germany in order to test derived hypotheses. The results of tests for group differences and regression analyses demonstrate that administrations that were structurally prepared, learned during preceding crises, and displayed a high quality in their network cooperation with other administrations and with the civil society, on average, performed significantly better in the respective crises. EVIDENCE FOR PRACTICE: While practitioners often prefer centralized and hierarchical solutions in times of crisis, this study highlights the potential of reflexive and adaptive use of multiactor networks to cope with the extraordinary. Administrations that are prepared and that display a high quality in their network cooperation with other administrations and with civil society, on average, performed significantly better in their respective crises. Knowledge management and resource sharing—both among administrative units and with civil society—increase organizational ability to perform well in crisis situations. Administrations do best when lessons learned in crises are accessibly stored and when previously successful crisis networks can be quickly revitalized, thus allowing for intercrisis learning—documentation of best practices during crises—via smart or traditional forms of data storing and organizational memory keeping—further boost the performance of administrations during succeeding crises. In the early stages of a crisis, decision makers need to invest in organizational self‐awareness of how challenges are mastered and how insights about optimal coping are best passed on.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7436478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74364782020-08-19 What Drives Successful Administrative Performance during Crises? Lessons from Refugee Migration and the Covid‐19 Pandemic Schomaker, Rahel M. Bauer, Michael W. Public Adm Rev Covid‐19 Viewpoint Symposium, Part II The Covid‐19 pandemic affects societies worldwide, challenging not only health sectors but also public administration systems in general. Understanding why public administrations perform well in the current situation—and in times of crisis more generally—is theoretically of great importance, and identifying concrete factors driving successful administrative performance under today's extraordinary circumstances could still improve current crisis responses. This article studies patterns of sound administrative performance with a focus on networks and knowledge management within and between crises. Subsequently, it draws on empirical evidence from two recent public administration surveys conducted in Germany in order to test derived hypotheses. The results of tests for group differences and regression analyses demonstrate that administrations that were structurally prepared, learned during preceding crises, and displayed a high quality in their network cooperation with other administrations and with the civil society, on average, performed significantly better in the respective crises. EVIDENCE FOR PRACTICE: While practitioners often prefer centralized and hierarchical solutions in times of crisis, this study highlights the potential of reflexive and adaptive use of multiactor networks to cope with the extraordinary. Administrations that are prepared and that display a high quality in their network cooperation with other administrations and with civil society, on average, performed significantly better in their respective crises. Knowledge management and resource sharing—both among administrative units and with civil society—increase organizational ability to perform well in crisis situations. Administrations do best when lessons learned in crises are accessibly stored and when previously successful crisis networks can be quickly revitalized, thus allowing for intercrisis learning—documentation of best practices during crises—via smart or traditional forms of data storing and organizational memory keeping—further boost the performance of administrations during succeeding crises. In the early stages of a crisis, decision makers need to invest in organizational self‐awareness of how challenges are mastered and how insights about optimal coping are best passed on. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. 2020-09-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7436478/ /pubmed/32836467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.13280 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Public Administration Review published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Society for Public Administration. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Covid‐19 Viewpoint Symposium, Part II
Schomaker, Rahel M.
Bauer, Michael W.
What Drives Successful Administrative Performance during Crises? Lessons from Refugee Migration and the Covid‐19 Pandemic
title What Drives Successful Administrative Performance during Crises? Lessons from Refugee Migration and the Covid‐19 Pandemic
title_full What Drives Successful Administrative Performance during Crises? Lessons from Refugee Migration and the Covid‐19 Pandemic
title_fullStr What Drives Successful Administrative Performance during Crises? Lessons from Refugee Migration and the Covid‐19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed What Drives Successful Administrative Performance during Crises? Lessons from Refugee Migration and the Covid‐19 Pandemic
title_short What Drives Successful Administrative Performance during Crises? Lessons from Refugee Migration and the Covid‐19 Pandemic
title_sort what drives successful administrative performance during crises? lessons from refugee migration and the covid‐19 pandemic
topic Covid‐19 Viewpoint Symposium, Part II
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32836467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.13280
work_keys_str_mv AT schomakerrahelm whatdrivessuccessfuladministrativeperformanceduringcriseslessonsfromrefugeemigrationandthecovid19pandemic
AT bauermichaelw whatdrivessuccessfuladministrativeperformanceduringcriseslessonsfromrefugeemigrationandthecovid19pandemic