Cargando…
Approaches to screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnant women during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic
AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of alternative diagnostic strategies to oral glucose tolerance tests, including random plasma glucose, fasting plasma glucose and HbA(1c), during the COVID‐19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective service data (Cambridge, UK; 17 736 consecutive s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32750184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.14380 |
_version_ | 1783572542853742592 |
---|---|
author | Meek, C. L. Lindsay, R. S. Scott, E. M. Aiken, C. E. Myers, J. Reynolds, R. M. Simmons, D. Yamamoto, J. M. McCance, D. R. Murphy, H. R. |
author_facet | Meek, C. L. Lindsay, R. S. Scott, E. M. Aiken, C. E. Myers, J. Reynolds, R. M. Simmons, D. Yamamoto, J. M. McCance, D. R. Murphy, H. R. |
author_sort | Meek, C. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of alternative diagnostic strategies to oral glucose tolerance tests, including random plasma glucose, fasting plasma glucose and HbA(1c), during the COVID‐19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective service data (Cambridge, UK; 17 736 consecutive singleton pregnancies, 2004–2008; 826 consecutive gestational diabetes pregnancies, 2014–2019) and 361 women with ≥1 gestational diabetes risk factor (OPHELIA prospective observational study, UK) were included. Pregnancy outcomes included gestational diabetes (National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence or International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria), diabetes in pregnancy (WHO criteria), Caesarean section, large‐for‐gestational age infant, neonatal hypoglycaemia and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Receiver‐operating characteristic curves and unadjusted logistic regression were used to compare random plasma glucose, fasting plasma glucose and HbA(1c) performance. RESULTS: Gestational diabetes diagnosis was significantly associated with random plasma glucose at 12 weeks [area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve for both criteria 0.81 (95% CI 0.79–0.83)], fasting plasma glucose [National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence: area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve 0.75 (95% CI 0.65–0.85); International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups: area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve 0.92 (95% CI 0.85–0.98)] and HbA(1c) at 28 weeks' gestation [National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence: 0.83 (95% CI 0.75–0.90); International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups: 0.84 (95% CI 0.77–0.91)]. Each measure predicts some, but not all, pregnancy outcomes studied. At 12 weeks, ~5% of women would be identified using random plasma glucose ≥8.5 mmol/l (sensitivity 42%; specificity 96%) and at 28 weeks using HbA(1c) ≥39 mmol/mol (sensitivity 26%; specificity 96%) or fasting plasma glucose ≥5.2–5.4 mmol/l (sensitivity 18–41%; specificity 97–98%). CONCLUSIONS: Random plasma glucose at 12 weeks, and fasting plasma glucose or HbA(1c) at 28 weeks identify women with hyperglycaemia at risk of suboptimal pregnancy outcomes. These opportunistic laboratory tests perform adequately for risk stratification when oral glucose tolerance testing is not available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7436759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74367592020-08-19 Approaches to screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnant women during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic Meek, C. L. Lindsay, R. S. Scott, E. M. Aiken, C. E. Myers, J. Reynolds, R. M. Simmons, D. Yamamoto, J. M. McCance, D. R. Murphy, H. R. Diabet Med Research: Care Delivery AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of alternative diagnostic strategies to oral glucose tolerance tests, including random plasma glucose, fasting plasma glucose and HbA(1c), during the COVID‐19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective service data (Cambridge, UK; 17 736 consecutive singleton pregnancies, 2004–2008; 826 consecutive gestational diabetes pregnancies, 2014–2019) and 361 women with ≥1 gestational diabetes risk factor (OPHELIA prospective observational study, UK) were included. Pregnancy outcomes included gestational diabetes (National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence or International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria), diabetes in pregnancy (WHO criteria), Caesarean section, large‐for‐gestational age infant, neonatal hypoglycaemia and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Receiver‐operating characteristic curves and unadjusted logistic regression were used to compare random plasma glucose, fasting plasma glucose and HbA(1c) performance. RESULTS: Gestational diabetes diagnosis was significantly associated with random plasma glucose at 12 weeks [area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve for both criteria 0.81 (95% CI 0.79–0.83)], fasting plasma glucose [National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence: area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve 0.75 (95% CI 0.65–0.85); International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups: area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve 0.92 (95% CI 0.85–0.98)] and HbA(1c) at 28 weeks' gestation [National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence: 0.83 (95% CI 0.75–0.90); International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups: 0.84 (95% CI 0.77–0.91)]. Each measure predicts some, but not all, pregnancy outcomes studied. At 12 weeks, ~5% of women would be identified using random plasma glucose ≥8.5 mmol/l (sensitivity 42%; specificity 96%) and at 28 weeks using HbA(1c) ≥39 mmol/mol (sensitivity 26%; specificity 96%) or fasting plasma glucose ≥5.2–5.4 mmol/l (sensitivity 18–41%; specificity 97–98%). CONCLUSIONS: Random plasma glucose at 12 weeks, and fasting plasma glucose or HbA(1c) at 28 weeks identify women with hyperglycaemia at risk of suboptimal pregnancy outcomes. These opportunistic laboratory tests perform adequately for risk stratification when oral glucose tolerance testing is not available. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-21 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7436759/ /pubmed/32750184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.14380 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research: Care Delivery Meek, C. L. Lindsay, R. S. Scott, E. M. Aiken, C. E. Myers, J. Reynolds, R. M. Simmons, D. Yamamoto, J. M. McCance, D. R. Murphy, H. R. Approaches to screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnant women during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title | Approaches to screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnant women during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_full | Approaches to screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnant women during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Approaches to screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnant women during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Approaches to screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnant women during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_short | Approaches to screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnant women during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic |
title_sort | approaches to screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnant women during and after the covid‐19 pandemic |
topic | Research: Care Delivery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32750184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.14380 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meekcl approachestoscreeningforhyperglycaemiainpregnantwomenduringandafterthecovid19pandemic AT lindsayrs approachestoscreeningforhyperglycaemiainpregnantwomenduringandafterthecovid19pandemic AT scottem approachestoscreeningforhyperglycaemiainpregnantwomenduringandafterthecovid19pandemic AT aikence approachestoscreeningforhyperglycaemiainpregnantwomenduringandafterthecovid19pandemic AT myersj approachestoscreeningforhyperglycaemiainpregnantwomenduringandafterthecovid19pandemic AT reynoldsrm approachestoscreeningforhyperglycaemiainpregnantwomenduringandafterthecovid19pandemic AT simmonsd approachestoscreeningforhyperglycaemiainpregnantwomenduringandafterthecovid19pandemic AT yamamotojm approachestoscreeningforhyperglycaemiainpregnantwomenduringandafterthecovid19pandemic AT mccancedr approachestoscreeningforhyperglycaemiainpregnantwomenduringandafterthecovid19pandemic AT murphyhr approachestoscreeningforhyperglycaemiainpregnantwomenduringandafterthecovid19pandemic |