Correlation of A-Kinase Interacting Protein 1 With Clinical Features, Treatment Response, and Survival Profiles in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to detect A-kinase interacting protein 1 expression and further explore the association of A-kinase interacting protein 1 with clinical features and prognosis in patients with multiple myeloma. METHODS: Totally, 152 de novo symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma and 30 healthy donors were enrolled. Bone marrow mononuclear cells derived plasma cells were collected from patients with multiple myeloma before initial treatment and from healthy donors on the enrollment, respectively, and then A-kinase interacting protein 1 protein/messenger RNA expressions were detected by Western blot and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Treatment response (complete response and overall response rate) was assessed, and survival profiles (progression-free survival and overall survival) were calculated in patients with multiple myeloma. RESULTS: A-kinase interacting protein 1 protein/messenger RNA expressions were elevated in patients with multiple myeloma compared to healthy donors, and A-kinase interacting protein 1 (area under the curve: 0.809, 95% confidence interval: 0.726-0.891)/messenger RNA (area under the curve: 0.839, 95% confidence interval: 0.764-0.914) presented good value in differentiating patients with multiple myeloma from healthy donors. In patients with multiple myeloma, A-kinase interacting protein 1 /messenger RNA expressions negatively correlated with albumin while positively correlated with Beta-2-microglobulin, lactate dehydrogenase, International Staging System stage, and t (4;14). Meanwhile, there were 39 (25.7%) complete response patients, 113 (74.3%) noncomplete response patients, 112 (73.7%) overall response rate patients, and 40 (26.3%) nonoverall response rate patients. Complete response and overall response rates were decreased in patients with high A-kinase interacting protein 1 compared to patients with low A-kinase interacting protein 1. Additionally, progression-free survival and overall survival were reduced in patients with high A-kinase interacting protein 1 compared to patients with low A-kinase interacting protein 1. CONCLUSION: A-kinase interacting protein 1 exhibits the potency as a biomarker for multiple myeloma progression and prognosis, which implies the clinical application of A-kinase interacting protein 1 in multiple myeloma management.