Cargando…

Lower Tibial Tunnel Placement in Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Quantitative Radiological Analysis of the Killer Turn

BACKGROUND: The “killer turn” effect after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction is a problem that can lead to graft laxity or failure. Solutions for this situation are currently lacking. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of a modified procedure for PCL reconstruction and quantif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Yipeng, Huang, Zeyuan, Zhang, Kaibo, Pan, Xuelin, Huang, Xihao, Li, Jian, Li, Qi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120923950
_version_ 1783572550541901824
author Lin, Yipeng
Huang, Zeyuan
Zhang, Kaibo
Pan, Xuelin
Huang, Xihao
Li, Jian
Li, Qi
author_facet Lin, Yipeng
Huang, Zeyuan
Zhang, Kaibo
Pan, Xuelin
Huang, Xihao
Li, Jian
Li, Qi
author_sort Lin, Yipeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The “killer turn” effect after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction is a problem that can lead to graft laxity or failure. Solutions for this situation are currently lacking. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of a modified procedure for PCL reconstruction and quantify the killer turn using 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT). STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 15 patients underwent modified PCL reconstruction with the tibial aperture below the center of the PCL footprint. Next, 2 virtual tibial tunnels with anatomic and proximal tibial apertures were created on 3D CT. All patients were assessed according to the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Tegner score, side-to-side difference (SSD) in tibial posterior translation using stress radiography, and 3D gait analysis. RESULTS: The modified tibial tunnel showed 2 significantly gentler turns (superior, 109.87° ± 10.12°; inferior, 151.25° ± 9.07°) compared with those reconstructed with anatomic (91.33° ± 7.28°; P < .001 for both comparisons) and proximal (99° ± 7.92°; P = .023 and P < .001, respectively) tibial apertures. The distance from the footprint to the tibial aperture was 16.49 ± 3.73 mm. All patient-reported outcome scores (mean ± SD) improved from pre- to postoperatively: Lysholm score, from 46.4 ± 18.87 to 83.47 ± 10.54 (P < .001); Tegner score, from 2.47 ± 1.85 to 6.07 ± 1.58 (P < .001); IKDC sports activities score, from 19 ± 9.90 to 33.07 ± 5.35 (P < .001); and IKDC knee symptoms score, from 17.87 ± 6.31 to 25.67 ± 3.66 (P < .001). The mean SSD improved from 9.15 ± 2.27 mm preoperatively to 4.20 ± 2.31 mm postoperatively (P < .001). The reconstructed knee showed significantly more adduction (by 1.642°), less flexion (by 1.285°), and more lateral translation (by 0.279 mm) than that of the intact knee (P < .001 for all). CONCLUSION: Lowering the tibial aperture during PCL reconstruction reduced the killer turn, and the clinical outcomes remained satisfactory. However, SSD and clinical outcomes were similar to those of previously described techniques using an anatomic tibial tunnel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7436807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74368072020-08-31 Lower Tibial Tunnel Placement in Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Quantitative Radiological Analysis of the Killer Turn Lin, Yipeng Huang, Zeyuan Zhang, Kaibo Pan, Xuelin Huang, Xihao Li, Jian Li, Qi Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The “killer turn” effect after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction is a problem that can lead to graft laxity or failure. Solutions for this situation are currently lacking. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of a modified procedure for PCL reconstruction and quantify the killer turn using 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT). STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 15 patients underwent modified PCL reconstruction with the tibial aperture below the center of the PCL footprint. Next, 2 virtual tibial tunnels with anatomic and proximal tibial apertures were created on 3D CT. All patients were assessed according to the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Tegner score, side-to-side difference (SSD) in tibial posterior translation using stress radiography, and 3D gait analysis. RESULTS: The modified tibial tunnel showed 2 significantly gentler turns (superior, 109.87° ± 10.12°; inferior, 151.25° ± 9.07°) compared with those reconstructed with anatomic (91.33° ± 7.28°; P < .001 for both comparisons) and proximal (99° ± 7.92°; P = .023 and P < .001, respectively) tibial apertures. The distance from the footprint to the tibial aperture was 16.49 ± 3.73 mm. All patient-reported outcome scores (mean ± SD) improved from pre- to postoperatively: Lysholm score, from 46.4 ± 18.87 to 83.47 ± 10.54 (P < .001); Tegner score, from 2.47 ± 1.85 to 6.07 ± 1.58 (P < .001); IKDC sports activities score, from 19 ± 9.90 to 33.07 ± 5.35 (P < .001); and IKDC knee symptoms score, from 17.87 ± 6.31 to 25.67 ± 3.66 (P < .001). The mean SSD improved from 9.15 ± 2.27 mm preoperatively to 4.20 ± 2.31 mm postoperatively (P < .001). The reconstructed knee showed significantly more adduction (by 1.642°), less flexion (by 1.285°), and more lateral translation (by 0.279 mm) than that of the intact knee (P < .001 for all). CONCLUSION: Lowering the tibial aperture during PCL reconstruction reduced the killer turn, and the clinical outcomes remained satisfactory. However, SSD and clinical outcomes were similar to those of previously described techniques using an anatomic tibial tunnel. SAGE Publications 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7436807/ /pubmed/32874997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120923950 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Lin, Yipeng
Huang, Zeyuan
Zhang, Kaibo
Pan, Xuelin
Huang, Xihao
Li, Jian
Li, Qi
Lower Tibial Tunnel Placement in Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Quantitative Radiological Analysis of the Killer Turn
title Lower Tibial Tunnel Placement in Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Quantitative Radiological Analysis of the Killer Turn
title_full Lower Tibial Tunnel Placement in Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Quantitative Radiological Analysis of the Killer Turn
title_fullStr Lower Tibial Tunnel Placement in Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Quantitative Radiological Analysis of the Killer Turn
title_full_unstemmed Lower Tibial Tunnel Placement in Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Quantitative Radiological Analysis of the Killer Turn
title_short Lower Tibial Tunnel Placement in Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Quantitative Radiological Analysis of the Killer Turn
title_sort lower tibial tunnel placement in isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcomes and quantitative radiological analysis of the killer turn
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120923950
work_keys_str_mv AT linyipeng lowertibialtunnelplacementinisolatedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionclinicaloutcomesandquantitativeradiologicalanalysisofthekillerturn
AT huangzeyuan lowertibialtunnelplacementinisolatedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionclinicaloutcomesandquantitativeradiologicalanalysisofthekillerturn
AT zhangkaibo lowertibialtunnelplacementinisolatedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionclinicaloutcomesandquantitativeradiologicalanalysisofthekillerturn
AT panxuelin lowertibialtunnelplacementinisolatedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionclinicaloutcomesandquantitativeradiologicalanalysisofthekillerturn
AT huangxihao lowertibialtunnelplacementinisolatedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionclinicaloutcomesandquantitativeradiologicalanalysisofthekillerturn
AT lijian lowertibialtunnelplacementinisolatedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionclinicaloutcomesandquantitativeradiologicalanalysisofthekillerturn
AT liqi lowertibialtunnelplacementinisolatedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionclinicaloutcomesandquantitativeradiologicalanalysisofthekillerturn