Cargando…

Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND: Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of expanded criteria in nodal staging in PDAC patients. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with histologically confirme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loch, Florian N., Asbach, Patrick, Haas, Matthias, Seeliger, Hendrik, Beyer, Katharina, Schineis, Christian, Degro, Claudius E., Margonis, Georgios A., Kreis, Martin E., Kamphues, Carsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32811523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01951-3
_version_ 1783572572046098432
author Loch, Florian N.
Asbach, Patrick
Haas, Matthias
Seeliger, Hendrik
Beyer, Katharina
Schineis, Christian
Degro, Claudius E.
Margonis, Georgios A.
Kreis, Martin E.
Kamphues, Carsten
author_facet Loch, Florian N.
Asbach, Patrick
Haas, Matthias
Seeliger, Hendrik
Beyer, Katharina
Schineis, Christian
Degro, Claudius E.
Margonis, Georgios A.
Kreis, Martin E.
Kamphues, Carsten
author_sort Loch, Florian N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of expanded criteria in nodal staging in PDAC patients. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with histologically confirmed PDAC that underwent primary surgery were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Cross-sectional imaging studies (CT and/or MRI) were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to histopathology. Number and size of lymph nodes were measured (short-axis diameter) and characterized in terms of expanded morphological criteria of border contour (spiculated, lobulated, and indistinct) and texture (homogeneous or inhomogeneous). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated with histopathology as a reference standard. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 66 patients (80%) had histologically confirmed lymph node metastases (pN+). Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden’s Index for the criterion “size” were 44.2%, 82.4%, and 0.27; for “inhomogeneous signal intensity” 25.6%, 94.1%, and 0.20; and for “border contour” 62.7%, 52.9%, and 0.16, respectively. There was a significant association between the number of visible lymph nodes on preoperative CT and lymph node involvement (pN+, p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Lymph node staging in PDAC is mainly limited due to low sensitivity for detection of metastatic disease. Using expanded morphological criteria instead of size did not improve regional nodal staging due to sensitivity remaining low. Combining specific criteria yields improved sensitivity with specificity and PPV remaining high.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7436989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74369892020-08-20 Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging Loch, Florian N. Asbach, Patrick Haas, Matthias Seeliger, Hendrik Beyer, Katharina Schineis, Christian Degro, Claudius E. Margonis, Georgios A. Kreis, Martin E. Kamphues, Carsten World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of expanded criteria in nodal staging in PDAC patients. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with histologically confirmed PDAC that underwent primary surgery were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Cross-sectional imaging studies (CT and/or MRI) were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to histopathology. Number and size of lymph nodes were measured (short-axis diameter) and characterized in terms of expanded morphological criteria of border contour (spiculated, lobulated, and indistinct) and texture (homogeneous or inhomogeneous). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated with histopathology as a reference standard. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 66 patients (80%) had histologically confirmed lymph node metastases (pN+). Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden’s Index for the criterion “size” were 44.2%, 82.4%, and 0.27; for “inhomogeneous signal intensity” 25.6%, 94.1%, and 0.20; and for “border contour” 62.7%, 52.9%, and 0.16, respectively. There was a significant association between the number of visible lymph nodes on preoperative CT and lymph node involvement (pN+, p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Lymph node staging in PDAC is mainly limited due to low sensitivity for detection of metastatic disease. Using expanded morphological criteria instead of size did not improve regional nodal staging due to sensitivity remaining low. Combining specific criteria yields improved sensitivity with specificity and PPV remaining high. BioMed Central 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7436989/ /pubmed/32811523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01951-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Loch, Florian N.
Asbach, Patrick
Haas, Matthias
Seeliger, Hendrik
Beyer, Katharina
Schineis, Christian
Degro, Claudius E.
Margonis, Georgios A.
Kreis, Martin E.
Kamphues, Carsten
Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
title Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32811523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01951-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lochfloriann accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT asbachpatrick accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT haasmatthias accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT seeligerhendrik accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT beyerkatharina accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT schineischristian accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT degroclaudiuse accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT margonisgeorgiosa accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kreismartine accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kamphuescarsten accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging