Cargando…
Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
BACKGROUND: Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of expanded criteria in nodal staging in PDAC patients. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with histologically confirme...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32811523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01951-3 |
_version_ | 1783572572046098432 |
---|---|
author | Loch, Florian N. Asbach, Patrick Haas, Matthias Seeliger, Hendrik Beyer, Katharina Schineis, Christian Degro, Claudius E. Margonis, Georgios A. Kreis, Martin E. Kamphues, Carsten |
author_facet | Loch, Florian N. Asbach, Patrick Haas, Matthias Seeliger, Hendrik Beyer, Katharina Schineis, Christian Degro, Claudius E. Margonis, Georgios A. Kreis, Martin E. Kamphues, Carsten |
author_sort | Loch, Florian N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of expanded criteria in nodal staging in PDAC patients. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with histologically confirmed PDAC that underwent primary surgery were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Cross-sectional imaging studies (CT and/or MRI) were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to histopathology. Number and size of lymph nodes were measured (short-axis diameter) and characterized in terms of expanded morphological criteria of border contour (spiculated, lobulated, and indistinct) and texture (homogeneous or inhomogeneous). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated with histopathology as a reference standard. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 66 patients (80%) had histologically confirmed lymph node metastases (pN+). Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden’s Index for the criterion “size” were 44.2%, 82.4%, and 0.27; for “inhomogeneous signal intensity” 25.6%, 94.1%, and 0.20; and for “border contour” 62.7%, 52.9%, and 0.16, respectively. There was a significant association between the number of visible lymph nodes on preoperative CT and lymph node involvement (pN+, p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Lymph node staging in PDAC is mainly limited due to low sensitivity for detection of metastatic disease. Using expanded morphological criteria instead of size did not improve regional nodal staging due to sensitivity remaining low. Combining specific criteria yields improved sensitivity with specificity and PPV remaining high. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7436989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74369892020-08-20 Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging Loch, Florian N. Asbach, Patrick Haas, Matthias Seeliger, Hendrik Beyer, Katharina Schineis, Christian Degro, Claudius E. Margonis, Georgios A. Kreis, Martin E. Kamphues, Carsten World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of expanded criteria in nodal staging in PDAC patients. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with histologically confirmed PDAC that underwent primary surgery were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Cross-sectional imaging studies (CT and/or MRI) were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to histopathology. Number and size of lymph nodes were measured (short-axis diameter) and characterized in terms of expanded morphological criteria of border contour (spiculated, lobulated, and indistinct) and texture (homogeneous or inhomogeneous). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated with histopathology as a reference standard. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 66 patients (80%) had histologically confirmed lymph node metastases (pN+). Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden’s Index for the criterion “size” were 44.2%, 82.4%, and 0.27; for “inhomogeneous signal intensity” 25.6%, 94.1%, and 0.20; and for “border contour” 62.7%, 52.9%, and 0.16, respectively. There was a significant association between the number of visible lymph nodes on preoperative CT and lymph node involvement (pN+, p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Lymph node staging in PDAC is mainly limited due to low sensitivity for detection of metastatic disease. Using expanded morphological criteria instead of size did not improve regional nodal staging due to sensitivity remaining low. Combining specific criteria yields improved sensitivity with specificity and PPV remaining high. BioMed Central 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7436989/ /pubmed/32811523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01951-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Loch, Florian N. Asbach, Patrick Haas, Matthias Seeliger, Hendrik Beyer, Katharina Schineis, Christian Degro, Claudius E. Margonis, Georgios A. Kreis, Martin E. Kamphues, Carsten Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging |
title | Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full | Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_short | Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_sort | accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7436989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32811523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01951-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lochfloriann accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT asbachpatrick accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT haasmatthias accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT seeligerhendrik accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT beyerkatharina accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT schineischristian accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT degroclaudiuse accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT margonisgeorgiosa accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT kreismartine accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT kamphuescarsten accuracyofvariouscriteriaforlymphnodestaginginductaladenocarcinomaofthepancreaticheadbycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging |