Cargando…

An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD

BACKGROUND: Contemporarily authoritative algorithms for the prediction of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) comprise the Standard algorithm, the Age-adjusted algorithm, the YEARS algorithm, the PERC algorithm, and the PEGeD algorithm. To date, little is known with respect to which algorithm is most appr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Wei, Du, He, Xu, Mei, Ding, Wei, Sun, Jinyuan, Han, Fengfeng, Guo, Xuejun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32811494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01483-0
_version_ 1783572577981038592
author Xiong, Wei
Du, He
Xu, Mei
Ding, Wei
Sun, Jinyuan
Han, Fengfeng
Guo, Xuejun
author_facet Xiong, Wei
Du, He
Xu, Mei
Ding, Wei
Sun, Jinyuan
Han, Fengfeng
Guo, Xuejun
author_sort Xiong, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Contemporarily authoritative algorithms for the prediction of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) comprise the Standard algorithm, the Age-adjusted algorithm, the YEARS algorithm, the PERC algorithm, and the PEGeD algorithm. To date, little is known with respect to which algorithm is most appropriate for the PE prediction in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). METHODS: The patients with AECOPD who underwent the confirmed chest imaging investigations of PE due to the likelihood of PE predicted by the Standard algorithm were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were reassessed by the other four algorithms to reveal which algorithm had the best diagnostic accuracy for the likelihood prediction of PE for patients with AECOPD. RESULTS: The results showed that the PEGeD algorithm(88.6, 80.7, 50.4, 97.0%, 4.591, 0.141, 0.693, 82.1%) performed better overall in the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, Youden index, and diagnostic accuracy, in comparison with the Age-adjusted algorithm (78.6, 74.1, 40.1, 94.0%, 3.034, 0.289, 0.527, 74.9%), the YEARS algorithm (71.4, 76.6, 40.3, 92.4%, 3.051, 0.373, 0.480,75.6%), the PERC algorithm (98.6, 1.6, 18.2, 83.3%, 1.002, 0.875, 0.002, 19.2%). The difference of number of patients who were necessary to undergo chest imaging examinations and missed diagnoses resulted from each algorithm between the PEGeD algorithm and the Standard algorithm, the Age-adjusted algorithm, the YEARS algorithm, as well as the PERC algorithm were [− 789 (− 68.1%), N/A], [− 42 (− 3.6%),-21 (− 1.8%)], [− 3 (− 0.3%),-36 (− 3.1%)],[− 771 (− 66.6%), 21 (1.8%)], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: To date, the PEGeD algorithm is the most appropriate strategy among the authoritative algorithms for the likelihood prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7437016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74370162020-08-20 An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD Xiong, Wei Du, He Xu, Mei Ding, Wei Sun, Jinyuan Han, Fengfeng Guo, Xuejun Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Contemporarily authoritative algorithms for the prediction of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) comprise the Standard algorithm, the Age-adjusted algorithm, the YEARS algorithm, the PERC algorithm, and the PEGeD algorithm. To date, little is known with respect to which algorithm is most appropriate for the PE prediction in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). METHODS: The patients with AECOPD who underwent the confirmed chest imaging investigations of PE due to the likelihood of PE predicted by the Standard algorithm were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were reassessed by the other four algorithms to reveal which algorithm had the best diagnostic accuracy for the likelihood prediction of PE for patients with AECOPD. RESULTS: The results showed that the PEGeD algorithm(88.6, 80.7, 50.4, 97.0%, 4.591, 0.141, 0.693, 82.1%) performed better overall in the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, Youden index, and diagnostic accuracy, in comparison with the Age-adjusted algorithm (78.6, 74.1, 40.1, 94.0%, 3.034, 0.289, 0.527, 74.9%), the YEARS algorithm (71.4, 76.6, 40.3, 92.4%, 3.051, 0.373, 0.480,75.6%), the PERC algorithm (98.6, 1.6, 18.2, 83.3%, 1.002, 0.875, 0.002, 19.2%). The difference of number of patients who were necessary to undergo chest imaging examinations and missed diagnoses resulted from each algorithm between the PEGeD algorithm and the Standard algorithm, the Age-adjusted algorithm, the YEARS algorithm, as well as the PERC algorithm were [− 789 (− 68.1%), N/A], [− 42 (− 3.6%),-21 (− 1.8%)], [− 3 (− 0.3%),-36 (− 3.1%)],[− 771 (− 66.6%), 21 (1.8%)], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: To date, the PEGeD algorithm is the most appropriate strategy among the authoritative algorithms for the likelihood prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD. BioMed Central 2020-08-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7437016/ /pubmed/32811494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01483-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Xiong, Wei
Du, He
Xu, Mei
Ding, Wei
Sun, Jinyuan
Han, Fengfeng
Guo, Xuejun
An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD
title An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD
title_full An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD
title_fullStr An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD
title_full_unstemmed An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD
title_short An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD
title_sort authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with aecopd
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32811494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01483-0
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongwei anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd
AT duhe anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd
AT xumei anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd
AT dingwei anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd
AT sunjinyuan anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd
AT hanfengfeng anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd
AT guoxuejun anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd
AT xiongwei authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd
AT duhe authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd
AT xumei authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd
AT dingwei authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd
AT sunjinyuan authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd
AT hanfengfeng authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd
AT guoxuejun authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd