Cargando…
An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD
BACKGROUND: Contemporarily authoritative algorithms for the prediction of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) comprise the Standard algorithm, the Age-adjusted algorithm, the YEARS algorithm, the PERC algorithm, and the PEGeD algorithm. To date, little is known with respect to which algorithm is most appr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32811494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01483-0 |
_version_ | 1783572577981038592 |
---|---|
author | Xiong, Wei Du, He Xu, Mei Ding, Wei Sun, Jinyuan Han, Fengfeng Guo, Xuejun |
author_facet | Xiong, Wei Du, He Xu, Mei Ding, Wei Sun, Jinyuan Han, Fengfeng Guo, Xuejun |
author_sort | Xiong, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Contemporarily authoritative algorithms for the prediction of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) comprise the Standard algorithm, the Age-adjusted algorithm, the YEARS algorithm, the PERC algorithm, and the PEGeD algorithm. To date, little is known with respect to which algorithm is most appropriate for the PE prediction in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). METHODS: The patients with AECOPD who underwent the confirmed chest imaging investigations of PE due to the likelihood of PE predicted by the Standard algorithm were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were reassessed by the other four algorithms to reveal which algorithm had the best diagnostic accuracy for the likelihood prediction of PE for patients with AECOPD. RESULTS: The results showed that the PEGeD algorithm(88.6, 80.7, 50.4, 97.0%, 4.591, 0.141, 0.693, 82.1%) performed better overall in the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, Youden index, and diagnostic accuracy, in comparison with the Age-adjusted algorithm (78.6, 74.1, 40.1, 94.0%, 3.034, 0.289, 0.527, 74.9%), the YEARS algorithm (71.4, 76.6, 40.3, 92.4%, 3.051, 0.373, 0.480,75.6%), the PERC algorithm (98.6, 1.6, 18.2, 83.3%, 1.002, 0.875, 0.002, 19.2%). The difference of number of patients who were necessary to undergo chest imaging examinations and missed diagnoses resulted from each algorithm between the PEGeD algorithm and the Standard algorithm, the Age-adjusted algorithm, the YEARS algorithm, as well as the PERC algorithm were [− 789 (− 68.1%), N/A], [− 42 (− 3.6%),-21 (− 1.8%)], [− 3 (− 0.3%),-36 (− 3.1%)],[− 771 (− 66.6%), 21 (1.8%)], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: To date, the PEGeD algorithm is the most appropriate strategy among the authoritative algorithms for the likelihood prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7437016 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74370162020-08-20 An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD Xiong, Wei Du, He Xu, Mei Ding, Wei Sun, Jinyuan Han, Fengfeng Guo, Xuejun Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Contemporarily authoritative algorithms for the prediction of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) comprise the Standard algorithm, the Age-adjusted algorithm, the YEARS algorithm, the PERC algorithm, and the PEGeD algorithm. To date, little is known with respect to which algorithm is most appropriate for the PE prediction in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). METHODS: The patients with AECOPD who underwent the confirmed chest imaging investigations of PE due to the likelihood of PE predicted by the Standard algorithm were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were reassessed by the other four algorithms to reveal which algorithm had the best diagnostic accuracy for the likelihood prediction of PE for patients with AECOPD. RESULTS: The results showed that the PEGeD algorithm(88.6, 80.7, 50.4, 97.0%, 4.591, 0.141, 0.693, 82.1%) performed better overall in the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, Youden index, and diagnostic accuracy, in comparison with the Age-adjusted algorithm (78.6, 74.1, 40.1, 94.0%, 3.034, 0.289, 0.527, 74.9%), the YEARS algorithm (71.4, 76.6, 40.3, 92.4%, 3.051, 0.373, 0.480,75.6%), the PERC algorithm (98.6, 1.6, 18.2, 83.3%, 1.002, 0.875, 0.002, 19.2%). The difference of number of patients who were necessary to undergo chest imaging examinations and missed diagnoses resulted from each algorithm between the PEGeD algorithm and the Standard algorithm, the Age-adjusted algorithm, the YEARS algorithm, as well as the PERC algorithm were [− 789 (− 68.1%), N/A], [− 42 (− 3.6%),-21 (− 1.8%)], [− 3 (− 0.3%),-36 (− 3.1%)],[− 771 (− 66.6%), 21 (1.8%)], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: To date, the PEGeD algorithm is the most appropriate strategy among the authoritative algorithms for the likelihood prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD. BioMed Central 2020-08-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7437016/ /pubmed/32811494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01483-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Xiong, Wei Du, He Xu, Mei Ding, Wei Sun, Jinyuan Han, Fengfeng Guo, Xuejun An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD |
title | An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD |
title_full | An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD |
title_fullStr | An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD |
title_full_unstemmed | An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD |
title_short | An authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with AECOPD |
title_sort | authoritative algorithm most appropriate for the prediction of pulmonary embolism in patients with aecopd |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32811494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01483-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiongwei anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd AT duhe anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd AT xumei anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd AT dingwei anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd AT sunjinyuan anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd AT hanfengfeng anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd AT guoxuejun anauthoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd AT xiongwei authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd AT duhe authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd AT xumei authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd AT dingwei authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd AT sunjinyuan authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd AT hanfengfeng authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd AT guoxuejun authoritativealgorithmmostappropriateforthepredictionofpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithaecopd |