Cargando…

Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy

INTRODUCTION: Fixed functional appliances are non-compliant solutions to Class II malocclusion treatment. The clinician, however, should be careful of unexpected complications during the therapy. METHODS: 58 female adolescents who presented with Class II malocclusion due to deficient mandible were t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elkordy, Sherif A., Fayed, Mona M. Salah, Attia, Khaled H., Abouelezz, Amr M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32844969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.3.065-072.oar
_version_ 1783572603049345024
author Elkordy, Sherif A.
Fayed, Mona M. Salah
Attia, Khaled H.
Abouelezz, Amr M.
author_facet Elkordy, Sherif A.
Fayed, Mona M. Salah
Attia, Khaled H.
Abouelezz, Amr M.
author_sort Elkordy, Sherif A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Fixed functional appliances are non-compliant solutions to Class II malocclusion treatment. The clinician, however, should be careful of unexpected complications during the therapy. METHODS: 58 female adolescents who presented with Class II malocclusion due to deficient mandible were treated with Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FFRD) therapy until an overcorrection to an edge to edge incisor relationship was achieved. RESULTS: Incisor relationship and overjet were corrected successfully in all the subjects. Twenty-two patients had a complications-free treatment, while several complications were encountered with the remaining 36 subjects. In particular, mandibular canine rotation and development of posterior crossbites were the most common complications, with percentages of 51.7% and 25.9% respectively. Other complications included the breakage and shearing of the extraoral tubes of the first molar bands, and excessive intrusion of the upper first molars. CONCLUSIONS: FFRD is an efficient appliance for treatment of Class II malocclusion; however, different complications were encountered during the appliance therapy. A focus on taking precautions and applying preventive measures can help to avoid such problems, reducing the number of emergency appointments and enhancing the treatment experience with the appliance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7437150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74371502020-08-28 Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy Elkordy, Sherif A. Fayed, Mona M. Salah Attia, Khaled H. Abouelezz, Amr M. Dental Press J Orthod Original Article INTRODUCTION: Fixed functional appliances are non-compliant solutions to Class II malocclusion treatment. The clinician, however, should be careful of unexpected complications during the therapy. METHODS: 58 female adolescents who presented with Class II malocclusion due to deficient mandible were treated with Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FFRD) therapy until an overcorrection to an edge to edge incisor relationship was achieved. RESULTS: Incisor relationship and overjet were corrected successfully in all the subjects. Twenty-two patients had a complications-free treatment, while several complications were encountered with the remaining 36 subjects. In particular, mandibular canine rotation and development of posterior crossbites were the most common complications, with percentages of 51.7% and 25.9% respectively. Other complications included the breakage and shearing of the extraoral tubes of the first molar bands, and excessive intrusion of the upper first molars. CONCLUSIONS: FFRD is an efficient appliance for treatment of Class II malocclusion; however, different complications were encountered during the appliance therapy. A focus on taking precautions and applying preventive measures can help to avoid such problems, reducing the number of emergency appointments and enhancing the treatment experience with the appliance. Dental Press International 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7437150/ /pubmed/32844969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.3.065-072.oar Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Elkordy, Sherif A.
Fayed, Mona M. Salah
Attia, Khaled H.
Abouelezz, Amr M.
Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy
title Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy
title_full Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy
title_fullStr Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy
title_full_unstemmed Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy
title_short Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy
title_sort complications encountered during forsus fatigue resistant device therapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32844969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.3.065-072.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT elkordysherifa complicationsencounteredduringforsusfatigueresistantdevicetherapy
AT fayedmonamsalah complicationsencounteredduringforsusfatigueresistantdevicetherapy
AT attiakhaledh complicationsencounteredduringforsusfatigueresistantdevicetherapy
AT abouelezzamrm complicationsencounteredduringforsusfatigueresistantdevicetherapy