Cargando…
Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy
INTRODUCTION: Fixed functional appliances are non-compliant solutions to Class II malocclusion treatment. The clinician, however, should be careful of unexpected complications during the therapy. METHODS: 58 female adolescents who presented with Class II malocclusion due to deficient mandible were t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32844969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.3.065-072.oar |
_version_ | 1783572603049345024 |
---|---|
author | Elkordy, Sherif A. Fayed, Mona M. Salah Attia, Khaled H. Abouelezz, Amr M. |
author_facet | Elkordy, Sherif A. Fayed, Mona M. Salah Attia, Khaled H. Abouelezz, Amr M. |
author_sort | Elkordy, Sherif A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Fixed functional appliances are non-compliant solutions to Class II malocclusion treatment. The clinician, however, should be careful of unexpected complications during the therapy. METHODS: 58 female adolescents who presented with Class II malocclusion due to deficient mandible were treated with Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FFRD) therapy until an overcorrection to an edge to edge incisor relationship was achieved. RESULTS: Incisor relationship and overjet were corrected successfully in all the subjects. Twenty-two patients had a complications-free treatment, while several complications were encountered with the remaining 36 subjects. In particular, mandibular canine rotation and development of posterior crossbites were the most common complications, with percentages of 51.7% and 25.9% respectively. Other complications included the breakage and shearing of the extraoral tubes of the first molar bands, and excessive intrusion of the upper first molars. CONCLUSIONS: FFRD is an efficient appliance for treatment of Class II malocclusion; however, different complications were encountered during the appliance therapy. A focus on taking precautions and applying preventive measures can help to avoid such problems, reducing the number of emergency appointments and enhancing the treatment experience with the appliance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7437150 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74371502020-08-28 Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy Elkordy, Sherif A. Fayed, Mona M. Salah Attia, Khaled H. Abouelezz, Amr M. Dental Press J Orthod Original Article INTRODUCTION: Fixed functional appliances are non-compliant solutions to Class II malocclusion treatment. The clinician, however, should be careful of unexpected complications during the therapy. METHODS: 58 female adolescents who presented with Class II malocclusion due to deficient mandible were treated with Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FFRD) therapy until an overcorrection to an edge to edge incisor relationship was achieved. RESULTS: Incisor relationship and overjet were corrected successfully in all the subjects. Twenty-two patients had a complications-free treatment, while several complications were encountered with the remaining 36 subjects. In particular, mandibular canine rotation and development of posterior crossbites were the most common complications, with percentages of 51.7% and 25.9% respectively. Other complications included the breakage and shearing of the extraoral tubes of the first molar bands, and excessive intrusion of the upper first molars. CONCLUSIONS: FFRD is an efficient appliance for treatment of Class II malocclusion; however, different complications were encountered during the appliance therapy. A focus on taking precautions and applying preventive measures can help to avoid such problems, reducing the number of emergency appointments and enhancing the treatment experience with the appliance. Dental Press International 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7437150/ /pubmed/32844969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.3.065-072.oar Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Elkordy, Sherif A. Fayed, Mona M. Salah Attia, Khaled H. Abouelezz, Amr M. Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy |
title | Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy |
title_full | Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy |
title_fullStr | Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy |
title_short | Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy |
title_sort | complications encountered during forsus fatigue resistant device therapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32844969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.3.065-072.oar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elkordysherifa complicationsencounteredduringforsusfatigueresistantdevicetherapy AT fayedmonamsalah complicationsencounteredduringforsusfatigueresistantdevicetherapy AT attiakhaledh complicationsencounteredduringforsusfatigueresistantdevicetherapy AT abouelezzamrm complicationsencounteredduringforsusfatigueresistantdevicetherapy |