Cargando…

In the Turkish News: Coronavirus and “Alternative & complementary” medicine methods

BACKGROUND AND OBJECT: The object of this study is to analyze the complementary and alternative treatments for the prevention of COVID-19/Coronavirus in the Turkish news. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The sample of this descriptive study consisted of 160 news articles published between 11 March and 11 April...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konakci, Gulbin, Ozgursoy Uran, Berna Nilgun, Erkin, Ozum
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102545
_version_ 1783572625051615232
author Konakci, Gulbin
Ozgursoy Uran, Berna Nilgun
Erkin, Ozum
author_facet Konakci, Gulbin
Ozgursoy Uran, Berna Nilgun
Erkin, Ozum
author_sort Konakci, Gulbin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECT: The object of this study is to analyze the complementary and alternative treatments for the prevention of COVID-19/Coronavirus in the Turkish news. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The sample of this descriptive study consisted of 160 news articles published between 11 March and 11 April 2020 on the websites of the three highest-circulating newspapers throughout the nation. A quantitative media context analysis method, consisting of 14 questions and 2 sections was employed to evaluate news on the newspapers. The data was analyzed using SPSS 21.0 statistical package program using numbers and percentages. RESULTS: Forty percent of the news analyzed within the scope of the study were obtained from the newspaper’s own news, reporter or columnist, 56.9 % were informative, 6.3 % were advisory and critical against the CAT methods. 95 % of the news included preventive or protective methods against COVID-19. 77.5 % of the complementary and alternative medicine methods mentioned in the news were biologically-based, 20.6 % were mind-body practices. It was determined that 85.0 % of the benefits, harm and side effects of the methods mentioned in the news were announced, but their impact on COVID-19 is not clarified (78.1 %), and there was insufficient information provided about the method and dosage of the method. It was seen that all news contained information on protection against COVID-19 or prevention of COVID19. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the sources and methods and the number of news items changed from one newspaper to another, the news lacked a scientific basis, and as a result, it might lead to misinterpretations among the public. There were different opinions among the experts in the proposed or criticized complementary and alternative medicine methods. It was observed that there was an increase in the number of news items related to using complementary and alternative medicine methods for the treatment of COVID19, a clear and easily understandable language was used in the news, but the content and sources of the news were insufficient in conveying the correct and scientific information. It was reported by previous literature potential interactions between herbal remedies/dietary supplements and prescribed drugs, complications of medical conditions and some adverse effects cause of CAM usage
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7437440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74374402020-08-20 In the Turkish News: Coronavirus and “Alternative & complementary” medicine methods Konakci, Gulbin Ozgursoy Uran, Berna Nilgun Erkin, Ozum Complement Ther Med Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECT: The object of this study is to analyze the complementary and alternative treatments for the prevention of COVID-19/Coronavirus in the Turkish news. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The sample of this descriptive study consisted of 160 news articles published between 11 March and 11 April 2020 on the websites of the three highest-circulating newspapers throughout the nation. A quantitative media context analysis method, consisting of 14 questions and 2 sections was employed to evaluate news on the newspapers. The data was analyzed using SPSS 21.0 statistical package program using numbers and percentages. RESULTS: Forty percent of the news analyzed within the scope of the study were obtained from the newspaper’s own news, reporter or columnist, 56.9 % were informative, 6.3 % were advisory and critical against the CAT methods. 95 % of the news included preventive or protective methods against COVID-19. 77.5 % of the complementary and alternative medicine methods mentioned in the news were biologically-based, 20.6 % were mind-body practices. It was determined that 85.0 % of the benefits, harm and side effects of the methods mentioned in the news were announced, but their impact on COVID-19 is not clarified (78.1 %), and there was insufficient information provided about the method and dosage of the method. It was seen that all news contained information on protection against COVID-19 or prevention of COVID19. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the sources and methods and the number of news items changed from one newspaper to another, the news lacked a scientific basis, and as a result, it might lead to misinterpretations among the public. There were different opinions among the experts in the proposed or criticized complementary and alternative medicine methods. It was observed that there was an increase in the number of news items related to using complementary and alternative medicine methods for the treatment of COVID19, a clear and easily understandable language was used in the news, but the content and sources of the news were insufficient in conveying the correct and scientific information. It was reported by previous literature potential interactions between herbal remedies/dietary supplements and prescribed drugs, complications of medical conditions and some adverse effects cause of CAM usage Elsevier Ltd. 2020-09 2020-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7437440/ /pubmed/33066867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102545 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Konakci, Gulbin
Ozgursoy Uran, Berna Nilgun
Erkin, Ozum
In the Turkish News: Coronavirus and “Alternative & complementary” medicine methods
title In the Turkish News: Coronavirus and “Alternative & complementary” medicine methods
title_full In the Turkish News: Coronavirus and “Alternative & complementary” medicine methods
title_fullStr In the Turkish News: Coronavirus and “Alternative & complementary” medicine methods
title_full_unstemmed In the Turkish News: Coronavirus and “Alternative & complementary” medicine methods
title_short In the Turkish News: Coronavirus and “Alternative & complementary” medicine methods
title_sort in the turkish news: coronavirus and “alternative & complementary” medicine methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102545
work_keys_str_mv AT konakcigulbin intheturkishnewscoronavirusandalternativecomplementarymedicinemethods
AT ozgursoyuranbernanilgun intheturkishnewscoronavirusandalternativecomplementarymedicinemethods
AT erkinozum intheturkishnewscoronavirusandalternativecomplementarymedicinemethods