Cargando…
A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aim to quantify the variation in root distribution in a set of 35 experimental wheat lines. We also compared the effect of variation in hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere on water uptake by roots. METHODS: We measured the root length density and soil drying in 35 wheat l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04530-3 |
_version_ | 1783572666990460928 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, X. X. Whalley, P. A. Ashton, R. W. Evans, J. Hawkesford, M. J. Griffiths, S. Huang, Z. D. Zhou, H. Mooney, S. J. Whalley, W. R. |
author_facet | Zhang, X. X. Whalley, P. A. Ashton, R. W. Evans, J. Hawkesford, M. J. Griffiths, S. Huang, Z. D. Zhou, H. Mooney, S. J. Whalley, W. R. |
author_sort | Zhang, X. X. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aim to quantify the variation in root distribution in a set of 35 experimental wheat lines. We also compared the effect of variation in hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere on water uptake by roots. METHODS: We measured the root length density and soil drying in 35 wheat lines in a field experiment. A 3D numerical model was used to predict soil drying profiles with the different root length distributions and compared with measured soil drying. The model was used to test different scenarios of the hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere. RESULTS: We showed that wheat lines with no detectable differences in root length density can induce soil drying profiles with statistically significant differences. Our data confirmed that a root length density of at least 1 cm/cm(3) is needed to drain all the available water in soil. In surface layers where the root length density was far greater than 1 cm/cm(3) water uptake was independent of rooting density due to competition for water. However, in deeper layers where root length density was less than 1 cm/cm(3), water uptake by roots was proportional to root density. CONCLUSION: In a set of wheat lines with no detectable differences in the root length density we found significant differences in water uptake. This may be because small differences in root density at depth can result in larger differences in water uptake or that the hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere can greatly affect water uptake. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11104-020-04530-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7437669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74376692020-08-24 A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties Zhang, X. X. Whalley, P. A. Ashton, R. W. Evans, J. Hawkesford, M. J. Griffiths, S. Huang, Z. D. Zhou, H. Mooney, S. J. Whalley, W. R. Plant Soil Regular Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aim to quantify the variation in root distribution in a set of 35 experimental wheat lines. We also compared the effect of variation in hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere on water uptake by roots. METHODS: We measured the root length density and soil drying in 35 wheat lines in a field experiment. A 3D numerical model was used to predict soil drying profiles with the different root length distributions and compared with measured soil drying. The model was used to test different scenarios of the hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere. RESULTS: We showed that wheat lines with no detectable differences in root length density can induce soil drying profiles with statistically significant differences. Our data confirmed that a root length density of at least 1 cm/cm(3) is needed to drain all the available water in soil. In surface layers where the root length density was far greater than 1 cm/cm(3) water uptake was independent of rooting density due to competition for water. However, in deeper layers where root length density was less than 1 cm/cm(3), water uptake by roots was proportional to root density. CONCLUSION: In a set of wheat lines with no detectable differences in the root length density we found significant differences in water uptake. This may be because small differences in root density at depth can result in larger differences in water uptake or that the hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere can greatly affect water uptake. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11104-020-04530-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-05-01 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7437669/ /pubmed/32848280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04530-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Zhang, X. X. Whalley, P. A. Ashton, R. W. Evans, J. Hawkesford, M. J. Griffiths, S. Huang, Z. D. Zhou, H. Mooney, S. J. Whalley, W. R. A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties |
title | A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties |
title_full | A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties |
title_fullStr | A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties |
title_short | A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties |
title_sort | comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04530-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangxx acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT whalleypa acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT ashtonrw acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT evansj acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT hawkesfordmj acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT griffithss acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT huangzd acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT zhouh acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT mooneysj acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT whalleywr acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT zhangxx comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT whalleypa comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT ashtonrw comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT evansj comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT hawkesfordmj comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT griffithss comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT huangzd comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT zhouh comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT mooneysj comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties AT whalleywr comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties |