Cargando…

A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aim to quantify the variation in root distribution in a set of 35 experimental wheat lines. We also compared the effect of variation in hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere on water uptake by roots. METHODS: We measured the root length density and soil drying in 35 wheat l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, X. X., Whalley, P. A., Ashton, R. W., Evans, J., Hawkesford, M. J., Griffiths, S., Huang, Z. D., Zhou, H., Mooney, S. J., Whalley, W. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04530-3
_version_ 1783572666990460928
author Zhang, X. X.
Whalley, P. A.
Ashton, R. W.
Evans, J.
Hawkesford, M. J.
Griffiths, S.
Huang, Z. D.
Zhou, H.
Mooney, S. J.
Whalley, W. R.
author_facet Zhang, X. X.
Whalley, P. A.
Ashton, R. W.
Evans, J.
Hawkesford, M. J.
Griffiths, S.
Huang, Z. D.
Zhou, H.
Mooney, S. J.
Whalley, W. R.
author_sort Zhang, X. X.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aim to quantify the variation in root distribution in a set of 35 experimental wheat lines. We also compared the effect of variation in hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere on water uptake by roots. METHODS: We measured the root length density and soil drying in 35 wheat lines in a field experiment. A 3D numerical model was used to predict soil drying profiles with the different root length distributions and compared with measured soil drying. The model was used to test different scenarios of the hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere. RESULTS: We showed that wheat lines with no detectable differences in root length density can induce soil drying profiles with statistically significant differences. Our data confirmed that a root length density of at least 1 cm/cm(3) is needed to drain all the available water in soil. In surface layers where the root length density was far greater than 1 cm/cm(3) water uptake was independent of rooting density due to competition for water. However, in deeper layers where root length density was less than 1 cm/cm(3), water uptake by roots was proportional to root density. CONCLUSION: In a set of wheat lines with no detectable differences in the root length density we found significant differences in water uptake. This may be because small differences in root density at depth can result in larger differences in water uptake or that the hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere can greatly affect water uptake. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11104-020-04530-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7437669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74376692020-08-24 A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties Zhang, X. X. Whalley, P. A. Ashton, R. W. Evans, J. Hawkesford, M. J. Griffiths, S. Huang, Z. D. Zhou, H. Mooney, S. J. Whalley, W. R. Plant Soil Regular Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aim to quantify the variation in root distribution in a set of 35 experimental wheat lines. We also compared the effect of variation in hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere on water uptake by roots. METHODS: We measured the root length density and soil drying in 35 wheat lines in a field experiment. A 3D numerical model was used to predict soil drying profiles with the different root length distributions and compared with measured soil drying. The model was used to test different scenarios of the hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere. RESULTS: We showed that wheat lines with no detectable differences in root length density can induce soil drying profiles with statistically significant differences. Our data confirmed that a root length density of at least 1 cm/cm(3) is needed to drain all the available water in soil. In surface layers where the root length density was far greater than 1 cm/cm(3) water uptake was independent of rooting density due to competition for water. However, in deeper layers where root length density was less than 1 cm/cm(3), water uptake by roots was proportional to root density. CONCLUSION: In a set of wheat lines with no detectable differences in the root length density we found significant differences in water uptake. This may be because small differences in root density at depth can result in larger differences in water uptake or that the hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere can greatly affect water uptake. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11104-020-04530-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-05-01 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7437669/ /pubmed/32848280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04530-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Zhang, X. X.
Whalley, P. A.
Ashton, R. W.
Evans, J.
Hawkesford, M. J.
Griffiths, S.
Huang, Z. D.
Zhou, H.
Mooney, S. J.
Whalley, W. R.
A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties
title A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties
title_full A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties
title_fullStr A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties
title_short A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties
title_sort comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04530-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxx acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT whalleypa acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT ashtonrw acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT evansj acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT hawkesfordmj acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT griffithss acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT huangzd acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT zhouh acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT mooneysj acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT whalleywr acomparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT zhangxx comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT whalleypa comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT ashtonrw comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT evansj comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT hawkesfordmj comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT griffithss comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT huangzd comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT zhouh comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT mooneysj comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties
AT whalleywr comparisonbetweenwateruptakeandrootlengthdensityinwinterwheateffectsofrootdensityandrhizosphereproperties