Cargando…
Assessment and improvement of junior doctor handover in the emergency department
INTRODUCTION: Effective handover between junior doctors is widely accepted as essential for patient safety. The British Medical Association in association with the National Health Service (NHS) National Patient Safety Agency and NHS Modernisation Agency have produced clear guidance regarding the con...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32816811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001032 |
_version_ | 1783572673036550144 |
---|---|
author | Sykes, Mark Garnham, Jack Kostelec, Pablo Martin Hall, Hazel Mitra, Anu |
author_facet | Sykes, Mark Garnham, Jack Kostelec, Pablo Martin Hall, Hazel Mitra, Anu |
author_sort | Sykes, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Effective handover between junior doctors is widely accepted as essential for patient safety. The British Medical Association in association with the National Health Service (NHS) National Patient Safety Agency and NHS Modernisation Agency have produced clear guidance regarding the contents and setting for a safe and efficient handover. We aimed to understand current junior doctor’s opinions on the handover process in a London emergency department (ED), with subsequent assessment, and any necessary improvement, of handover practices within the department. METHODS: In a London ED, a baseline survey was completed by the senior house officer (SHO) cohort to gauge current opinions of the existing handover process. Concurrently, a blinded prospective audit of handover practises was conducted. Multiple improvement strategies were subsequently implemented and assessed via Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles. A standard operating procedure was initially introduced and ‘rolled out’ throughout the department. This intervention was followed by development of an electronic handover note to ease completion of a satisfactory handover. Additional surveys were conducted to continually assess SHO opinion on how the handover process was developing. The final improvement strategy was formal handover teaching at the SHO induction. RESULTS: Baseline audit and SHO survey highlighted several opportunities for improvement. 5 handover components were deemed essential: (1) documented handover note; (2) doctor’s names; (3) history of presenting complaint; (4) ED actions; and (5) ongoing plan. The frequency of these components saw significant improvement by completion of the final PDSA. Following SHO rotation, all of the essential components fell, only to recover after the next improvement strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Junior doctors in a London ED were not satisfied with the current SHO handover process, and handover practices were not adequate. While the rotational nature of the SHO cohort makes sustained change challenging, implementation of thoughtful and realistic improvement strategies can significantly improve handover quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7437714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74377142020-08-24 Assessment and improvement of junior doctor handover in the emergency department Sykes, Mark Garnham, Jack Kostelec, Pablo Martin Hall, Hazel Mitra, Anu BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report INTRODUCTION: Effective handover between junior doctors is widely accepted as essential for patient safety. The British Medical Association in association with the National Health Service (NHS) National Patient Safety Agency and NHS Modernisation Agency have produced clear guidance regarding the contents and setting for a safe and efficient handover. We aimed to understand current junior doctor’s opinions on the handover process in a London emergency department (ED), with subsequent assessment, and any necessary improvement, of handover practices within the department. METHODS: In a London ED, a baseline survey was completed by the senior house officer (SHO) cohort to gauge current opinions of the existing handover process. Concurrently, a blinded prospective audit of handover practises was conducted. Multiple improvement strategies were subsequently implemented and assessed via Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles. A standard operating procedure was initially introduced and ‘rolled out’ throughout the department. This intervention was followed by development of an electronic handover note to ease completion of a satisfactory handover. Additional surveys were conducted to continually assess SHO opinion on how the handover process was developing. The final improvement strategy was formal handover teaching at the SHO induction. RESULTS: Baseline audit and SHO survey highlighted several opportunities for improvement. 5 handover components were deemed essential: (1) documented handover note; (2) doctor’s names; (3) history of presenting complaint; (4) ED actions; and (5) ongoing plan. The frequency of these components saw significant improvement by completion of the final PDSA. Following SHO rotation, all of the essential components fell, only to recover after the next improvement strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Junior doctors in a London ED were not satisfied with the current SHO handover process, and handover practices were not adequate. While the rotational nature of the SHO cohort makes sustained change challenging, implementation of thoughtful and realistic improvement strategies can significantly improve handover quality. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7437714/ /pubmed/32816811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001032 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Report Sykes, Mark Garnham, Jack Kostelec, Pablo Martin Hall, Hazel Mitra, Anu Assessment and improvement of junior doctor handover in the emergency department |
title | Assessment and improvement of junior doctor handover in the emergency department |
title_full | Assessment and improvement of junior doctor handover in the emergency department |
title_fullStr | Assessment and improvement of junior doctor handover in the emergency department |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment and improvement of junior doctor handover in the emergency department |
title_short | Assessment and improvement of junior doctor handover in the emergency department |
title_sort | assessment and improvement of junior doctor handover in the emergency department |
topic | Quality Improvement Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32816811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sykesmark assessmentandimprovementofjuniordoctorhandoverintheemergencydepartment AT garnhamjack assessmentandimprovementofjuniordoctorhandoverintheemergencydepartment AT kostelecpablomartin assessmentandimprovementofjuniordoctorhandoverintheemergencydepartment AT hallhazel assessmentandimprovementofjuniordoctorhandoverintheemergencydepartment AT mitraanu assessmentandimprovementofjuniordoctorhandoverintheemergencydepartment |