Cargando…

Non-invasive quantitative measures of qualitative grading effectiveness as the indices of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Recent improvement of machinery evaluation for the skin changes in various therapies enabled us to evaluate fine changes quantitatively. In this study, we performed evaluation of the changes in radiation dermatitis (RD) using quantitative and qualitative methods, and verified the validit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sekine, Hiroshi, Kijima, Yoshikazu, Kobayashi, Masao, Itami, Jun, Takahashi, Kana, Igaki, Hiroshi, Nakai, Yasuo, Mizutani, Hitoshi, Nomoto, Yoshihito, Kikuchi, Katsuko, Matsushita, Haruo, Nozawa, Keiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01082-3
_version_ 1783572774738984960
author Sekine, Hiroshi
Kijima, Yoshikazu
Kobayashi, Masao
Itami, Jun
Takahashi, Kana
Igaki, Hiroshi
Nakai, Yasuo
Mizutani, Hitoshi
Nomoto, Yoshihito
Kikuchi, Katsuko
Matsushita, Haruo
Nozawa, Keiko
author_facet Sekine, Hiroshi
Kijima, Yoshikazu
Kobayashi, Masao
Itami, Jun
Takahashi, Kana
Igaki, Hiroshi
Nakai, Yasuo
Mizutani, Hitoshi
Nomoto, Yoshihito
Kikuchi, Katsuko
Matsushita, Haruo
Nozawa, Keiko
author_sort Sekine, Hiroshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent improvement of machinery evaluation for the skin changes in various therapies enabled us to evaluate fine changes quantitatively. In this study, we performed evaluation of the changes in radiation dermatitis (RD) using quantitative and qualitative methods, and verified the validity of the conventional qualitative assessment for clinical use. METHODS: Forty-three breast cancer patients received conventional fractionated radiotherapy to whole breast after breast-conserving surgery. Erythema, pigmentation and skin dryness were evaluated qualitatively, and biophysical parameters of RD were measured using a Multi-Display Device MDD4 with a Corneometer for capacitance, a Tewameter for transepidermal water loss (TEWL), a Mexameter for erythema index and melanin index. Measurements were performed periodically until 1 year. RESULTS: The quantitative manifestations developed serially from skin erythema followed by dryness and pigmentation. Quantitative measurements detected the effects of irradiation earlier than that of qualitative indices. However, the grades of the domains in RD by qualitative and quantitative assessment showed similar time courses and peak periods. However, no significant correlation was observed between the skin dryness grade and skin barrier function. In contrast to serial increase in pigmentation grades, melanin index showed initial decrease followed by marked increase with significant correlation with pigmentation grades. CONCLUSION: Subjectively and objectively measured results of RD were almost similar course and peak points through the study. Therefore, validity of the conventional qualitative scoring for RD is confirmed by the present quantitative assessments. Instrumental evaluations revealed the presence of modest inflammatory changes before radiotherapy and long-lasting skin dryness, suggesting indication of intervention for RD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7438338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74383382020-08-27 Non-invasive quantitative measures of qualitative grading effectiveness as the indices of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients Sekine, Hiroshi Kijima, Yoshikazu Kobayashi, Masao Itami, Jun Takahashi, Kana Igaki, Hiroshi Nakai, Yasuo Mizutani, Hitoshi Nomoto, Yoshihito Kikuchi, Katsuko Matsushita, Haruo Nozawa, Keiko Breast Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: Recent improvement of machinery evaluation for the skin changes in various therapies enabled us to evaluate fine changes quantitatively. In this study, we performed evaluation of the changes in radiation dermatitis (RD) using quantitative and qualitative methods, and verified the validity of the conventional qualitative assessment for clinical use. METHODS: Forty-three breast cancer patients received conventional fractionated radiotherapy to whole breast after breast-conserving surgery. Erythema, pigmentation and skin dryness were evaluated qualitatively, and biophysical parameters of RD were measured using a Multi-Display Device MDD4 with a Corneometer for capacitance, a Tewameter for transepidermal water loss (TEWL), a Mexameter for erythema index and melanin index. Measurements were performed periodically until 1 year. RESULTS: The quantitative manifestations developed serially from skin erythema followed by dryness and pigmentation. Quantitative measurements detected the effects of irradiation earlier than that of qualitative indices. However, the grades of the domains in RD by qualitative and quantitative assessment showed similar time courses and peak periods. However, no significant correlation was observed between the skin dryness grade and skin barrier function. In contrast to serial increase in pigmentation grades, melanin index showed initial decrease followed by marked increase with significant correlation with pigmentation grades. CONCLUSION: Subjectively and objectively measured results of RD were almost similar course and peak points through the study. Therefore, validity of the conventional qualitative scoring for RD is confirmed by the present quantitative assessments. Instrumental evaluations revealed the presence of modest inflammatory changes before radiotherapy and long-lasting skin dryness, suggesting indication of intervention for RD. Springer Japan 2020-05-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7438338/ /pubmed/32363524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01082-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sekine, Hiroshi
Kijima, Yoshikazu
Kobayashi, Masao
Itami, Jun
Takahashi, Kana
Igaki, Hiroshi
Nakai, Yasuo
Mizutani, Hitoshi
Nomoto, Yoshihito
Kikuchi, Katsuko
Matsushita, Haruo
Nozawa, Keiko
Non-invasive quantitative measures of qualitative grading effectiveness as the indices of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients
title Non-invasive quantitative measures of qualitative grading effectiveness as the indices of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients
title_full Non-invasive quantitative measures of qualitative grading effectiveness as the indices of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients
title_fullStr Non-invasive quantitative measures of qualitative grading effectiveness as the indices of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive quantitative measures of qualitative grading effectiveness as the indices of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients
title_short Non-invasive quantitative measures of qualitative grading effectiveness as the indices of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients
title_sort non-invasive quantitative measures of qualitative grading effectiveness as the indices of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01082-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sekinehiroshi noninvasivequantitativemeasuresofqualitativegradingeffectivenessastheindicesofacuteradiationdermatitisinbreastcancerpatients
AT kijimayoshikazu noninvasivequantitativemeasuresofqualitativegradingeffectivenessastheindicesofacuteradiationdermatitisinbreastcancerpatients
AT kobayashimasao noninvasivequantitativemeasuresofqualitativegradingeffectivenessastheindicesofacuteradiationdermatitisinbreastcancerpatients
AT itamijun noninvasivequantitativemeasuresofqualitativegradingeffectivenessastheindicesofacuteradiationdermatitisinbreastcancerpatients
AT takahashikana noninvasivequantitativemeasuresofqualitativegradingeffectivenessastheindicesofacuteradiationdermatitisinbreastcancerpatients
AT igakihiroshi noninvasivequantitativemeasuresofqualitativegradingeffectivenessastheindicesofacuteradiationdermatitisinbreastcancerpatients
AT nakaiyasuo noninvasivequantitativemeasuresofqualitativegradingeffectivenessastheindicesofacuteradiationdermatitisinbreastcancerpatients
AT mizutanihitoshi noninvasivequantitativemeasuresofqualitativegradingeffectivenessastheindicesofacuteradiationdermatitisinbreastcancerpatients
AT nomotoyoshihito noninvasivequantitativemeasuresofqualitativegradingeffectivenessastheindicesofacuteradiationdermatitisinbreastcancerpatients
AT kikuchikatsuko noninvasivequantitativemeasuresofqualitativegradingeffectivenessastheindicesofacuteradiationdermatitisinbreastcancerpatients
AT matsushitaharuo noninvasivequantitativemeasuresofqualitativegradingeffectivenessastheindicesofacuteradiationdermatitisinbreastcancerpatients
AT nozawakeiko noninvasivequantitativemeasuresofqualitativegradingeffectivenessastheindicesofacuteradiationdermatitisinbreastcancerpatients