Cargando…
Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options
In order to understand this disparity between human use and drugs approved by regulatory agencies, we analyzed botanical drug clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrial.gov to detect trends in current trials and guide future trials. A total of 195 botanical drug clinical trials were registered from...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32839685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2020.08.003 |
_version_ | 1783572775901855744 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Yu Qian, Jiahua |
author_facet | Sun, Yu Qian, Jiahua |
author_sort | Sun, Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | In order to understand this disparity between human use and drugs approved by regulatory agencies, we analyzed botanical drug clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrial.gov to detect trends in current trials and guide future trials. A total of 195 botanical drug clinical trials were registered from 2016 to 2019, of which 81 are phase II or phase II/III. 95% of all phase II and II/III studies were designed with 100 or less participants per arm, indicating a more observational nature due to the limited power to detect differences in outcomes between treatment and control groups. Due to the limited number of participants, efficacy outcome from results may be highly subjective. 14% of the total trials were phase I studies. For botanical drugs with well-documented or extensive history of human use, phase I may not provide significant additional information, and may, therefore, not be necessary. For the trial design, we suggest added-on studies when botanical drugs are used as part of a combination treatment. Additionally, we believe standardized data collection methods and criteria are critical to utilizing the vast collection of human experience as quality evidence to support regulatory approval. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7438343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74383432020-08-20 Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options Sun, Yu Qian, Jiahua Acta Pharm Sin B Policy Forum In order to understand this disparity between human use and drugs approved by regulatory agencies, we analyzed botanical drug clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrial.gov to detect trends in current trials and guide future trials. A total of 195 botanical drug clinical trials were registered from 2016 to 2019, of which 81 are phase II or phase II/III. 95% of all phase II and II/III studies were designed with 100 or less participants per arm, indicating a more observational nature due to the limited power to detect differences in outcomes between treatment and control groups. Due to the limited number of participants, efficacy outcome from results may be highly subjective. 14% of the total trials were phase I studies. For botanical drugs with well-documented or extensive history of human use, phase I may not provide significant additional information, and may, therefore, not be necessary. For the trial design, we suggest added-on studies when botanical drugs are used as part of a combination treatment. Additionally, we believe standardized data collection methods and criteria are critical to utilizing the vast collection of human experience as quality evidence to support regulatory approval. Elsevier 2021-01 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7438343/ /pubmed/32839685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2020.08.003 Text en © 2021 Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Academy of Medical Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Policy Forum Sun, Yu Qian, Jiahua Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options |
title | Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options |
title_full | Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options |
title_fullStr | Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options |
title_full_unstemmed | Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options |
title_short | Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options |
title_sort | botanical drug clinical trial: common issues and future options |
topic | Policy Forum |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32839685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2020.08.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunyu botanicaldrugclinicaltrialcommonissuesandfutureoptions AT qianjiahua botanicaldrugclinicaltrialcommonissuesandfutureoptions |