Cargando…

Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options

In order to understand this disparity between human use and drugs approved by regulatory agencies, we analyzed botanical drug clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrial.gov to detect trends in current trials and guide future trials. A total of 195 botanical drug clinical trials were registered from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Yu, Qian, Jiahua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32839685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2020.08.003
_version_ 1783572775901855744
author Sun, Yu
Qian, Jiahua
author_facet Sun, Yu
Qian, Jiahua
author_sort Sun, Yu
collection PubMed
description In order to understand this disparity between human use and drugs approved by regulatory agencies, we analyzed botanical drug clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrial.gov to detect trends in current trials and guide future trials. A total of 195 botanical drug clinical trials were registered from 2016 to 2019, of which 81 are phase II or phase II/III. 95% of all phase II and II/III studies were designed with 100 or less participants per arm, indicating a more observational nature due to the limited power to detect differences in outcomes between treatment and control groups. Due to the limited number of participants, efficacy outcome from results may be highly subjective. 14% of the total trials were phase I studies. For botanical drugs with well-documented or extensive history of human use, phase I may not provide significant additional information, and may, therefore, not be necessary. For the trial design, we suggest added-on studies when botanical drugs are used as part of a combination treatment. Additionally, we believe standardized data collection methods and criteria are critical to utilizing the vast collection of human experience as quality evidence to support regulatory approval.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7438343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74383432020-08-20 Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options Sun, Yu Qian, Jiahua Acta Pharm Sin B Policy Forum In order to understand this disparity between human use and drugs approved by regulatory agencies, we analyzed botanical drug clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrial.gov to detect trends in current trials and guide future trials. A total of 195 botanical drug clinical trials were registered from 2016 to 2019, of which 81 are phase II or phase II/III. 95% of all phase II and II/III studies were designed with 100 or less participants per arm, indicating a more observational nature due to the limited power to detect differences in outcomes between treatment and control groups. Due to the limited number of participants, efficacy outcome from results may be highly subjective. 14% of the total trials were phase I studies. For botanical drugs with well-documented or extensive history of human use, phase I may not provide significant additional information, and may, therefore, not be necessary. For the trial design, we suggest added-on studies when botanical drugs are used as part of a combination treatment. Additionally, we believe standardized data collection methods and criteria are critical to utilizing the vast collection of human experience as quality evidence to support regulatory approval. Elsevier 2021-01 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7438343/ /pubmed/32839685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2020.08.003 Text en © 2021 Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Academy of Medical Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Policy Forum
Sun, Yu
Qian, Jiahua
Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options
title Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options
title_full Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options
title_fullStr Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options
title_full_unstemmed Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options
title_short Botanical drug clinical trial: Common issues and future options
title_sort botanical drug clinical trial: common issues and future options
topic Policy Forum
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32839685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2020.08.003
work_keys_str_mv AT sunyu botanicaldrugclinicaltrialcommonissuesandfutureoptions
AT qianjiahua botanicaldrugclinicaltrialcommonissuesandfutureoptions