Cargando…
Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does
Smartphones present multiple applications for ambulatory practice. One of the newer technologies is smartphone-based electrocardiography (ECG). While this technology has been explored in horses and cattle, it has not yet been evaluated for goats. Fifteen goats of dairy and meat breeds were simultane...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32903541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00416 |
_version_ | 1783572794128203776 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Joe S. Ward, Jessica L. Schneider, Benjamin K. Smith, Fauna L. Mueller, Mikaela S. Heller, Meera C. |
author_facet | Smith, Joe S. Ward, Jessica L. Schneider, Benjamin K. Smith, Fauna L. Mueller, Mikaela S. Heller, Meera C. |
author_sort | Smith, Joe S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Smartphones present multiple applications for ambulatory practice. One of the newer technologies is smartphone-based electrocardiography (ECG). While this technology has been explored in horses and cattle, it has not yet been evaluated for goats. Fifteen goats of dairy and meat breeds were simultaneously tested with both a standard and smartphone-based ECG from two different anatomic locations (base apex and sternal positions). ECGs were compared for quality score, heart rate, and ECG intervals. Smartphone-based ECGs were feasible to collect in all goats under field settings. Scoring indicated higher quality scores for the standard ECG when compared to the smartphone-based ECG, and differences in smartphone ECG quality scores were noted between goats of different body types. Heart rate agreement was noted between measurements taken from smartphone-based and standard devices. ECG intervals calculated for smartphone-based ECGs were clinically similar to standard ECG. While not of the same diagnostic quality as standard ECG recordings, smartphone-based ECGs for goats present an easy to collect recording for caprine practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7438445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74384452020-09-03 Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does Smith, Joe S. Ward, Jessica L. Schneider, Benjamin K. Smith, Fauna L. Mueller, Mikaela S. Heller, Meera C. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Smartphones present multiple applications for ambulatory practice. One of the newer technologies is smartphone-based electrocardiography (ECG). While this technology has been explored in horses and cattle, it has not yet been evaluated for goats. Fifteen goats of dairy and meat breeds were simultaneously tested with both a standard and smartphone-based ECG from two different anatomic locations (base apex and sternal positions). ECGs were compared for quality score, heart rate, and ECG intervals. Smartphone-based ECGs were feasible to collect in all goats under field settings. Scoring indicated higher quality scores for the standard ECG when compared to the smartphone-based ECG, and differences in smartphone ECG quality scores were noted between goats of different body types. Heart rate agreement was noted between measurements taken from smartphone-based and standard devices. ECG intervals calculated for smartphone-based ECGs were clinically similar to standard ECG. While not of the same diagnostic quality as standard ECG recordings, smartphone-based ECGs for goats present an easy to collect recording for caprine practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7438445/ /pubmed/32903541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00416 Text en Copyright © 2020 Smith, Ward, Schneider, Smith, Mueller and Heller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Smith, Joe S. Ward, Jessica L. Schneider, Benjamin K. Smith, Fauna L. Mueller, Mikaela S. Heller, Meera C. Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does |
title | Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does |
title_full | Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does |
title_short | Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does |
title_sort | comparison of standard electrocardiography and smartphone-based electrocardiography recorded at two different anatomic locations in healthy meat and dairy breed does |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32903541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00416 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithjoes comparisonofstandardelectrocardiographyandsmartphonebasedelectrocardiographyrecordedattwodifferentanatomiclocationsinhealthymeatanddairybreeddoes AT wardjessical comparisonofstandardelectrocardiographyandsmartphonebasedelectrocardiographyrecordedattwodifferentanatomiclocationsinhealthymeatanddairybreeddoes AT schneiderbenjamink comparisonofstandardelectrocardiographyandsmartphonebasedelectrocardiographyrecordedattwodifferentanatomiclocationsinhealthymeatanddairybreeddoes AT smithfaunal comparisonofstandardelectrocardiographyandsmartphonebasedelectrocardiographyrecordedattwodifferentanatomiclocationsinhealthymeatanddairybreeddoes AT muellermikaelas comparisonofstandardelectrocardiographyandsmartphonebasedelectrocardiographyrecordedattwodifferentanatomiclocationsinhealthymeatanddairybreeddoes AT hellermeerac comparisonofstandardelectrocardiographyandsmartphonebasedelectrocardiographyrecordedattwodifferentanatomiclocationsinhealthymeatanddairybreeddoes |