Cargando…

Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does

Smartphones present multiple applications for ambulatory practice. One of the newer technologies is smartphone-based electrocardiography (ECG). While this technology has been explored in horses and cattle, it has not yet been evaluated for goats. Fifteen goats of dairy and meat breeds were simultane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Joe S., Ward, Jessica L., Schneider, Benjamin K., Smith, Fauna L., Mueller, Mikaela S., Heller, Meera C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32903541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00416
_version_ 1783572794128203776
author Smith, Joe S.
Ward, Jessica L.
Schneider, Benjamin K.
Smith, Fauna L.
Mueller, Mikaela S.
Heller, Meera C.
author_facet Smith, Joe S.
Ward, Jessica L.
Schneider, Benjamin K.
Smith, Fauna L.
Mueller, Mikaela S.
Heller, Meera C.
author_sort Smith, Joe S.
collection PubMed
description Smartphones present multiple applications for ambulatory practice. One of the newer technologies is smartphone-based electrocardiography (ECG). While this technology has been explored in horses and cattle, it has not yet been evaluated for goats. Fifteen goats of dairy and meat breeds were simultaneously tested with both a standard and smartphone-based ECG from two different anatomic locations (base apex and sternal positions). ECGs were compared for quality score, heart rate, and ECG intervals. Smartphone-based ECGs were feasible to collect in all goats under field settings. Scoring indicated higher quality scores for the standard ECG when compared to the smartphone-based ECG, and differences in smartphone ECG quality scores were noted between goats of different body types. Heart rate agreement was noted between measurements taken from smartphone-based and standard devices. ECG intervals calculated for smartphone-based ECGs were clinically similar to standard ECG. While not of the same diagnostic quality as standard ECG recordings, smartphone-based ECGs for goats present an easy to collect recording for caprine practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7438445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74384452020-09-03 Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does Smith, Joe S. Ward, Jessica L. Schneider, Benjamin K. Smith, Fauna L. Mueller, Mikaela S. Heller, Meera C. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Smartphones present multiple applications for ambulatory practice. One of the newer technologies is smartphone-based electrocardiography (ECG). While this technology has been explored in horses and cattle, it has not yet been evaluated for goats. Fifteen goats of dairy and meat breeds were simultaneously tested with both a standard and smartphone-based ECG from two different anatomic locations (base apex and sternal positions). ECGs were compared for quality score, heart rate, and ECG intervals. Smartphone-based ECGs were feasible to collect in all goats under field settings. Scoring indicated higher quality scores for the standard ECG when compared to the smartphone-based ECG, and differences in smartphone ECG quality scores were noted between goats of different body types. Heart rate agreement was noted between measurements taken from smartphone-based and standard devices. ECG intervals calculated for smartphone-based ECGs were clinically similar to standard ECG. While not of the same diagnostic quality as standard ECG recordings, smartphone-based ECGs for goats present an easy to collect recording for caprine practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7438445/ /pubmed/32903541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00416 Text en Copyright © 2020 Smith, Ward, Schneider, Smith, Mueller and Heller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Smith, Joe S.
Ward, Jessica L.
Schneider, Benjamin K.
Smith, Fauna L.
Mueller, Mikaela S.
Heller, Meera C.
Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does
title Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does
title_full Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does
title_fullStr Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does
title_short Comparison of Standard Electrocardiography and Smartphone-Based Electrocardiography Recorded at Two Different Anatomic Locations in Healthy Meat and Dairy Breed Does
title_sort comparison of standard electrocardiography and smartphone-based electrocardiography recorded at two different anatomic locations in healthy meat and dairy breed does
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32903541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00416
work_keys_str_mv AT smithjoes comparisonofstandardelectrocardiographyandsmartphonebasedelectrocardiographyrecordedattwodifferentanatomiclocationsinhealthymeatanddairybreeddoes
AT wardjessical comparisonofstandardelectrocardiographyandsmartphonebasedelectrocardiographyrecordedattwodifferentanatomiclocationsinhealthymeatanddairybreeddoes
AT schneiderbenjamink comparisonofstandardelectrocardiographyandsmartphonebasedelectrocardiographyrecordedattwodifferentanatomiclocationsinhealthymeatanddairybreeddoes
AT smithfaunal comparisonofstandardelectrocardiographyandsmartphonebasedelectrocardiographyrecordedattwodifferentanatomiclocationsinhealthymeatanddairybreeddoes
AT muellermikaelas comparisonofstandardelectrocardiographyandsmartphonebasedelectrocardiographyrecordedattwodifferentanatomiclocationsinhealthymeatanddairybreeddoes
AT hellermeerac comparisonofstandardelectrocardiographyandsmartphonebasedelectrocardiographyrecordedattwodifferentanatomiclocationsinhealthymeatanddairybreeddoes