Cargando…
Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey
OBJECTIVES: With growing attention on the healthcare industry as a potential market for big data and artificial intelligence in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, countries around the world are introducing and developing various policies and projects related to health information technology (HIT). To...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Medical Informatics
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32819041 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.3.229 |
_version_ | 1783572838050955264 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Mona Kim, Mihui Kim, Jung A Chang, Hyejung |
author_facet | Choi, Mona Kim, Mihui Kim, Jung A Chang, Hyejung |
author_sort | Choi, Mona |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: With growing attention on the healthcare industry as a potential market for big data and artificial intelligence in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, countries around the world are introducing and developing various policies and projects related to health information technology (HIT). To assist prioritizing HIT topics in policy making, this study adopts the Delphi technique to garner expert opinions from various fields of health informatics. METHODS: Data were collected from November 2019 to February 2020 using the Delphi technique through two rounds of surveys administered via email. The Delphi panel consisted of 16 experts with a high level of experience in health informatics. They were from the Health Information Policy Advisory Committee of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea, and the board of directors of the Korean Society of Medical Informatics. The experts were asked to assess the importance, urgency, and difficulty of HIT topics in three domains: technology, application, and infrastructure. RESULTS: Of the 40 topic items, a 100% agreement was reached for the importance of 6 items, including 2 items in technology, 1 item in application, and 3 items in infrastructure domains. Especially, Quadrant I of a 2×2 matrix showing high importance and high urgency included 7 items in the technology domain, 2 items in the application domain, and 13 items in the infrastructure domain. CONCLUSIONS: Most items with high importance and urgency belonged to the infrastructure domain. The findings indicated that fostering an infrastructural environment should be polices with top priorities of HIT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7438690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Korean Society of Medical Informatics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74386902020-08-25 Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey Choi, Mona Kim, Mihui Kim, Jung A Chang, Hyejung Healthc Inform Res Original Article OBJECTIVES: With growing attention on the healthcare industry as a potential market for big data and artificial intelligence in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, countries around the world are introducing and developing various policies and projects related to health information technology (HIT). To assist prioritizing HIT topics in policy making, this study adopts the Delphi technique to garner expert opinions from various fields of health informatics. METHODS: Data were collected from November 2019 to February 2020 using the Delphi technique through two rounds of surveys administered via email. The Delphi panel consisted of 16 experts with a high level of experience in health informatics. They were from the Health Information Policy Advisory Committee of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea, and the board of directors of the Korean Society of Medical Informatics. The experts were asked to assess the importance, urgency, and difficulty of HIT topics in three domains: technology, application, and infrastructure. RESULTS: Of the 40 topic items, a 100% agreement was reached for the importance of 6 items, including 2 items in technology, 1 item in application, and 3 items in infrastructure domains. Especially, Quadrant I of a 2×2 matrix showing high importance and high urgency included 7 items in the technology domain, 2 items in the application domain, and 13 items in the infrastructure domain. CONCLUSIONS: Most items with high importance and urgency belonged to the infrastructure domain. The findings indicated that fostering an infrastructural environment should be polices with top priorities of HIT. Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2020-07 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7438690/ /pubmed/32819041 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.3.229 Text en © 2020 The Korean Society of Medical Informatics This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Choi, Mona Kim, Mihui Kim, Jung A Chang, Hyejung Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey |
title | Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey |
title_full | Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey |
title_fullStr | Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey |
title_short | Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey |
title_sort | building consensus on the priority-setting for national policies in health information technology: a delphi survey |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32819041 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.3.229 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choimona buildingconsensusontheprioritysettingfornationalpoliciesinhealthinformationtechnologyadelphisurvey AT kimmihui buildingconsensusontheprioritysettingfornationalpoliciesinhealthinformationtechnologyadelphisurvey AT kimjunga buildingconsensusontheprioritysettingfornationalpoliciesinhealthinformationtechnologyadelphisurvey AT changhyejung buildingconsensusontheprioritysettingfornationalpoliciesinhealthinformationtechnologyadelphisurvey |