Cargando…

Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey

OBJECTIVES: With growing attention on the healthcare industry as a potential market for big data and artificial intelligence in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, countries around the world are introducing and developing various policies and projects related to health information technology (HIT). To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Mona, Kim, Mihui, Kim, Jung A, Chang, Hyejung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32819041
http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.3.229
_version_ 1783572838050955264
author Choi, Mona
Kim, Mihui
Kim, Jung A
Chang, Hyejung
author_facet Choi, Mona
Kim, Mihui
Kim, Jung A
Chang, Hyejung
author_sort Choi, Mona
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: With growing attention on the healthcare industry as a potential market for big data and artificial intelligence in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, countries around the world are introducing and developing various policies and projects related to health information technology (HIT). To assist prioritizing HIT topics in policy making, this study adopts the Delphi technique to garner expert opinions from various fields of health informatics. METHODS: Data were collected from November 2019 to February 2020 using the Delphi technique through two rounds of surveys administered via email. The Delphi panel consisted of 16 experts with a high level of experience in health informatics. They were from the Health Information Policy Advisory Committee of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea, and the board of directors of the Korean Society of Medical Informatics. The experts were asked to assess the importance, urgency, and difficulty of HIT topics in three domains: technology, application, and infrastructure. RESULTS: Of the 40 topic items, a 100% agreement was reached for the importance of 6 items, including 2 items in technology, 1 item in application, and 3 items in infrastructure domains. Especially, Quadrant I of a 2×2 matrix showing high importance and high urgency included 7 items in the technology domain, 2 items in the application domain, and 13 items in the infrastructure domain. CONCLUSIONS: Most items with high importance and urgency belonged to the infrastructure domain. The findings indicated that fostering an infrastructural environment should be polices with top priorities of HIT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7438690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Medical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74386902020-08-25 Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey Choi, Mona Kim, Mihui Kim, Jung A Chang, Hyejung Healthc Inform Res Original Article OBJECTIVES: With growing attention on the healthcare industry as a potential market for big data and artificial intelligence in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, countries around the world are introducing and developing various policies and projects related to health information technology (HIT). To assist prioritizing HIT topics in policy making, this study adopts the Delphi technique to garner expert opinions from various fields of health informatics. METHODS: Data were collected from November 2019 to February 2020 using the Delphi technique through two rounds of surveys administered via email. The Delphi panel consisted of 16 experts with a high level of experience in health informatics. They were from the Health Information Policy Advisory Committee of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea, and the board of directors of the Korean Society of Medical Informatics. The experts were asked to assess the importance, urgency, and difficulty of HIT topics in three domains: technology, application, and infrastructure. RESULTS: Of the 40 topic items, a 100% agreement was reached for the importance of 6 items, including 2 items in technology, 1 item in application, and 3 items in infrastructure domains. Especially, Quadrant I of a 2×2 matrix showing high importance and high urgency included 7 items in the technology domain, 2 items in the application domain, and 13 items in the infrastructure domain. CONCLUSIONS: Most items with high importance and urgency belonged to the infrastructure domain. The findings indicated that fostering an infrastructural environment should be polices with top priorities of HIT. Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2020-07 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7438690/ /pubmed/32819041 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.3.229 Text en © 2020 The Korean Society of Medical Informatics This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choi, Mona
Kim, Mihui
Kim, Jung A
Chang, Hyejung
Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey
title Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey
title_full Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey
title_fullStr Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey
title_full_unstemmed Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey
title_short Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey
title_sort building consensus on the priority-setting for national policies in health information technology: a delphi survey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32819041
http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.3.229
work_keys_str_mv AT choimona buildingconsensusontheprioritysettingfornationalpoliciesinhealthinformationtechnologyadelphisurvey
AT kimmihui buildingconsensusontheprioritysettingfornationalpoliciesinhealthinformationtechnologyadelphisurvey
AT kimjunga buildingconsensusontheprioritysettingfornationalpoliciesinhealthinformationtechnologyadelphisurvey
AT changhyejung buildingconsensusontheprioritysettingfornationalpoliciesinhealthinformationtechnologyadelphisurvey