Cargando…
Recurrence/Regrowth in Grade I Meningioma: How to Predict?
The HLA-G and HLA-E molecules, Ki67, progesterone (PR), estrogen (ER) and androgen receptors (AR), p53, COX-2, and HER2 were studied to assess whether the biological behavior of grade I meningiomas is related to their expression. Tissue samples from 96 patients with grade I intracranial meningiomas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32903787 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01144 |
_version_ | 1783572897426571264 |
---|---|
author | de Carvalho, Gervásio Teles Cardoso da Silva-Martins, Warley Carvalho de Magalhães, Kênia Cristina Soares Fonseca Nunes, Cristiana Buzelin Soares, Aleida Nazareth Tafuri, Luciene Simões de Assis Simões, Renata Toscano |
author_facet | de Carvalho, Gervásio Teles Cardoso da Silva-Martins, Warley Carvalho de Magalhães, Kênia Cristina Soares Fonseca Nunes, Cristiana Buzelin Soares, Aleida Nazareth Tafuri, Luciene Simões de Assis Simões, Renata Toscano |
author_sort | de Carvalho, Gervásio Teles Cardoso |
collection | PubMed |
description | The HLA-G and HLA-E molecules, Ki67, progesterone (PR), estrogen (ER) and androgen receptors (AR), p53, COX-2, and HER2 were studied to assess whether the biological behavior of grade I meningiomas is related to their expression. Tissue samples from 96 patients with grade I intracranial meningiomas were analyzed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray blocks (TMA) using antibodies specific for HLA-G, HLA-E, Ki67, PR, ER, AR, p53, COX-2, and HER2. Meningiomas were classified as small (≤2 cm, 1.0%), medium (>2 and ≤4 cm, 32.3%), and large (>4 cm, 66.7%). Tumor size was not related to recurrence/regrowth (p = 0.486), but was significantly correlated with peritumoral edema (p = 0.031) and intratumoral calcifications (p = 0.018). Recurrent meningiomas were observed in 14.6% of cases. Immunostaining for each marker was: HLA-G 100%; HLA-E 95.6%; PR 62%; ER 2.1%; AR 6.5%; p53 92.6%; COX-2 100%; HER2 0%; Ki67, mean 2.61 ± 2.29%, median 2.1%. Primary and recurrent meningiomas showed no significant relation with HLA-E and hormone receptors (p > 0.05), except for Ki67, where a higher median was observed in recurrent tumors than in primary (p = 0.014). The larger the tumor, the more severe the peritumoral edema, and the greater the presence of calcifications. Ki67 appears to be a good biomarker of recurrence/regrowth in grade I meningiomas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7438949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74389492020-09-03 Recurrence/Regrowth in Grade I Meningioma: How to Predict? de Carvalho, Gervásio Teles Cardoso da Silva-Martins, Warley Carvalho de Magalhães, Kênia Cristina Soares Fonseca Nunes, Cristiana Buzelin Soares, Aleida Nazareth Tafuri, Luciene Simões de Assis Simões, Renata Toscano Front Oncol Oncology The HLA-G and HLA-E molecules, Ki67, progesterone (PR), estrogen (ER) and androgen receptors (AR), p53, COX-2, and HER2 were studied to assess whether the biological behavior of grade I meningiomas is related to their expression. Tissue samples from 96 patients with grade I intracranial meningiomas were analyzed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray blocks (TMA) using antibodies specific for HLA-G, HLA-E, Ki67, PR, ER, AR, p53, COX-2, and HER2. Meningiomas were classified as small (≤2 cm, 1.0%), medium (>2 and ≤4 cm, 32.3%), and large (>4 cm, 66.7%). Tumor size was not related to recurrence/regrowth (p = 0.486), but was significantly correlated with peritumoral edema (p = 0.031) and intratumoral calcifications (p = 0.018). Recurrent meningiomas were observed in 14.6% of cases. Immunostaining for each marker was: HLA-G 100%; HLA-E 95.6%; PR 62%; ER 2.1%; AR 6.5%; p53 92.6%; COX-2 100%; HER2 0%; Ki67, mean 2.61 ± 2.29%, median 2.1%. Primary and recurrent meningiomas showed no significant relation with HLA-E and hormone receptors (p > 0.05), except for Ki67, where a higher median was observed in recurrent tumors than in primary (p = 0.014). The larger the tumor, the more severe the peritumoral edema, and the greater the presence of calcifications. Ki67 appears to be a good biomarker of recurrence/regrowth in grade I meningiomas. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7438949/ /pubmed/32903787 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01144 Text en Copyright © 2020 Carvalho, Silva-Martins, Magalhães, Nunes, Soares, Tafuri and Simões. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology de Carvalho, Gervásio Teles Cardoso da Silva-Martins, Warley Carvalho de Magalhães, Kênia Cristina Soares Fonseca Nunes, Cristiana Buzelin Soares, Aleida Nazareth Tafuri, Luciene Simões de Assis Simões, Renata Toscano Recurrence/Regrowth in Grade I Meningioma: How to Predict? |
title | Recurrence/Regrowth in Grade I Meningioma: How to Predict? |
title_full | Recurrence/Regrowth in Grade I Meningioma: How to Predict? |
title_fullStr | Recurrence/Regrowth in Grade I Meningioma: How to Predict? |
title_full_unstemmed | Recurrence/Regrowth in Grade I Meningioma: How to Predict? |
title_short | Recurrence/Regrowth in Grade I Meningioma: How to Predict? |
title_sort | recurrence/regrowth in grade i meningioma: how to predict? |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32903787 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01144 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT decarvalhogervasiotelescardoso recurrenceregrowthingradeimeningiomahowtopredict AT dasilvamartinswarleycarvalho recurrenceregrowthingradeimeningiomahowtopredict AT demagalhaeskeniacristinasoaresfonseca recurrenceregrowthingradeimeningiomahowtopredict AT nunescristianabuzelin recurrenceregrowthingradeimeningiomahowtopredict AT soaresaleidanazareth recurrenceregrowthingradeimeningiomahowtopredict AT tafurilucienesimoesdeassis recurrenceregrowthingradeimeningiomahowtopredict AT simoesrenatatoscano recurrenceregrowthingradeimeningiomahowtopredict |