Cargando…

Clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring in hospital wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Delayed response to clinical deterioration as a result of intermittent vital sign monitoring is a cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. This review focuses on the clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring of vital signs (CoNiM) in non-intensive care uni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Lin, Joshi, Meera, Khan, Sadia N, Ashrafian, Hutan, Darzi, Ara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32521195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0141076820925436
_version_ 1783573012275003392
author Sun, Lin
Joshi, Meera
Khan, Sadia N
Ashrafian, Hutan
Darzi, Ara
author_facet Sun, Lin
Joshi, Meera
Khan, Sadia N
Ashrafian, Hutan
Darzi, Ara
author_sort Sun, Lin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Delayed response to clinical deterioration as a result of intermittent vital sign monitoring is a cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. This review focuses on the clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring of vital signs (CoNiM) in non-intensive care unit patients. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of primary studies. Embase, MEDLINE, HMIC, PsycINFO and Cochrane were searched from April 1964 to 18 June 2019 with no language restriction. SETTING: The search was limited to hospitalised, non-intensive care unit adult patients who had two or more vital signs continuously monitored. PARTICIPANTS: All primary studies that evaluated the clinical impact of using multi-parameter CoNiM in adult hospital wards outside of the intensive care unit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical impact of multi-parameter CoNiM. RESULTS: This systematic review identified 14 relevant studies from 3846 search results. Five studies were classified as Group A – associations found between measured vital signs and clinical parameters. Nine studies were classified as Group B – comparison between clinical outcomes of patients with and without multi-parameter CoNiM. Vital signs data from CoNiM were found to associate with type of presenting complaint, level of renal function and incidence of major clinical events. CoNiM also assisted in diagnosis by differentiating between patients with acute heart failure, stroke and sepsis (with sub-clustering of septic patients). In the meta-analysis, patients on multi-parameter CoNiM had a 39% decrease in risk of mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.61; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.39, 0.95) when compared to patients with regular intermittent monitoring. There was a trend of reduced intensive care unit transfer (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.67, 1.11) and reduced rapid response team activation (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.26–1.43). A trend towards reduced hospital length of stay was also found using weighted mean difference (WMD –3.32 days; 95% CI -8.82–2.19 days). CONCLUSION: There is evidence of clinical benefit in implementing CoNiM in non-intensive care unit patients. This review supports the use of multi-parameter CoNiM outside of intensive care unit with further large-scale RCTs required to further affirm clinical impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7439595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74395952020-08-31 Clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring in hospital wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sun, Lin Joshi, Meera Khan, Sadia N Ashrafian, Hutan Darzi, Ara J R Soc Med Research OBJECTIVE: Delayed response to clinical deterioration as a result of intermittent vital sign monitoring is a cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. This review focuses on the clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring of vital signs (CoNiM) in non-intensive care unit patients. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of primary studies. Embase, MEDLINE, HMIC, PsycINFO and Cochrane were searched from April 1964 to 18 June 2019 with no language restriction. SETTING: The search was limited to hospitalised, non-intensive care unit adult patients who had two or more vital signs continuously monitored. PARTICIPANTS: All primary studies that evaluated the clinical impact of using multi-parameter CoNiM in adult hospital wards outside of the intensive care unit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical impact of multi-parameter CoNiM. RESULTS: This systematic review identified 14 relevant studies from 3846 search results. Five studies were classified as Group A – associations found between measured vital signs and clinical parameters. Nine studies were classified as Group B – comparison between clinical outcomes of patients with and without multi-parameter CoNiM. Vital signs data from CoNiM were found to associate with type of presenting complaint, level of renal function and incidence of major clinical events. CoNiM also assisted in diagnosis by differentiating between patients with acute heart failure, stroke and sepsis (with sub-clustering of septic patients). In the meta-analysis, patients on multi-parameter CoNiM had a 39% decrease in risk of mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.61; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.39, 0.95) when compared to patients with regular intermittent monitoring. There was a trend of reduced intensive care unit transfer (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.67, 1.11) and reduced rapid response team activation (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.26–1.43). A trend towards reduced hospital length of stay was also found using weighted mean difference (WMD –3.32 days; 95% CI -8.82–2.19 days). CONCLUSION: There is evidence of clinical benefit in implementing CoNiM in non-intensive care unit patients. This review supports the use of multi-parameter CoNiM outside of intensive care unit with further large-scale RCTs required to further affirm clinical impact. SAGE Publications 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7439595/ /pubmed/32521195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0141076820925436 Text en © The Royal Society of Medicine
spellingShingle Research
Sun, Lin
Joshi, Meera
Khan, Sadia N
Ashrafian, Hutan
Darzi, Ara
Clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring in hospital wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring in hospital wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring in hospital wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring in hospital wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring in hospital wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring in hospital wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring in hospital wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32521195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0141076820925436
work_keys_str_mv AT sunlin clinicalimpactofmultiparametercontinuousnoninvasivemonitoringinhospitalwardsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT joshimeera clinicalimpactofmultiparametercontinuousnoninvasivemonitoringinhospitalwardsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khansadian clinicalimpactofmultiparametercontinuousnoninvasivemonitoringinhospitalwardsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ashrafianhutan clinicalimpactofmultiparametercontinuousnoninvasivemonitoringinhospitalwardsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT darziara clinicalimpactofmultiparametercontinuousnoninvasivemonitoringinhospitalwardsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis