Cargando…
Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall
BACKGROUND: Transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TUR) is associated with a risk of bladder perforation. The underlying mechanisms and risk factors are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine if the bladder wall structure affects the risk of bladder perforation during T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32814580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01992-8 |
_version_ | 1783573016264835072 |
---|---|
author | Poletajew, Sławomir Ilczuk, Tomasz Krajewski, Wojciech Niemczyk, Grzegorz Cyran, Agata Białek, Łukasz Radziszewski, Piotr Górnicka, Barbara Kryst, Piotr |
author_facet | Poletajew, Sławomir Ilczuk, Tomasz Krajewski, Wojciech Niemczyk, Grzegorz Cyran, Agata Białek, Łukasz Radziszewski, Piotr Górnicka, Barbara Kryst, Piotr |
author_sort | Poletajew, Sławomir |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TUR) is associated with a risk of bladder perforation. The underlying mechanisms and risk factors are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine if the bladder wall structure affects the risk of bladder perforation during TUR. METHODS: Fifteen patients who underwent TUR complicated by a bladder perforation (group 1) and fifteen matched controls who underwent uncomplicated TUR (group 2) were retrospectively enrolled in this morphological analysis. Surgical specimens were collected from all participating patients to describe the quality and architecture of urothelium and bladder submucosa. Immunohistochemical studies were performed with primary mouse anti-human E-cadherin, beta-catenin, type IV collagen, cytokeratin 20 and epithelial membrane antigen antibodies. The intensity of the immunohistochemical reaction was assessed using an immunoreactive score (IRS). Ultrastructural examinations were performed by transmission electron microscopy. The microscopic assessment was focused on the intensity of fibrosis in the bladder submucosa and the presence of degenerative changes in the urothelium. RESULTS: Patients’ age, sex distribution, tumour diameters, surgeon experience or cancer stage did not differ between study groups. The immunohistochemical analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences between group 1 and group 2. From a clinical point of view, ultrastructural analysis by electron microscopy showed a higher rate of severe fibrosis in group 1 (63.6% vs. 38.5%), with no differences in the rate and degree of urothelial changes. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Bladder perforation during TUR is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall. Based on available evidence, the surgical technique seems to play the most important role in its prevention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7439624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74396242020-08-24 Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall Poletajew, Sławomir Ilczuk, Tomasz Krajewski, Wojciech Niemczyk, Grzegorz Cyran, Agata Białek, Łukasz Radziszewski, Piotr Górnicka, Barbara Kryst, Piotr World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TUR) is associated with a risk of bladder perforation. The underlying mechanisms and risk factors are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine if the bladder wall structure affects the risk of bladder perforation during TUR. METHODS: Fifteen patients who underwent TUR complicated by a bladder perforation (group 1) and fifteen matched controls who underwent uncomplicated TUR (group 2) were retrospectively enrolled in this morphological analysis. Surgical specimens were collected from all participating patients to describe the quality and architecture of urothelium and bladder submucosa. Immunohistochemical studies were performed with primary mouse anti-human E-cadherin, beta-catenin, type IV collagen, cytokeratin 20 and epithelial membrane antigen antibodies. The intensity of the immunohistochemical reaction was assessed using an immunoreactive score (IRS). Ultrastructural examinations were performed by transmission electron microscopy. The microscopic assessment was focused on the intensity of fibrosis in the bladder submucosa and the presence of degenerative changes in the urothelium. RESULTS: Patients’ age, sex distribution, tumour diameters, surgeon experience or cancer stage did not differ between study groups. The immunohistochemical analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences between group 1 and group 2. From a clinical point of view, ultrastructural analysis by electron microscopy showed a higher rate of severe fibrosis in group 1 (63.6% vs. 38.5%), with no differences in the rate and degree of urothelial changes. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Bladder perforation during TUR is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall. Based on available evidence, the surgical technique seems to play the most important role in its prevention. BioMed Central 2020-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7439624/ /pubmed/32814580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01992-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Poletajew, Sławomir Ilczuk, Tomasz Krajewski, Wojciech Niemczyk, Grzegorz Cyran, Agata Białek, Łukasz Radziszewski, Piotr Górnicka, Barbara Kryst, Piotr Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall |
title | Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall |
title_full | Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall |
title_fullStr | Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall |
title_full_unstemmed | Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall |
title_short | Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall |
title_sort | bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32814580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01992-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poletajewsławomir bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall AT ilczuktomasz bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall AT krajewskiwojciech bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall AT niemczykgrzegorz bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall AT cyranagata bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall AT białekłukasz bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall AT radziszewskipiotr bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall AT gornickabarbara bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall AT krystpiotr bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall |