Cargando…

Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall

BACKGROUND: Transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TUR) is associated with a risk of bladder perforation. The underlying mechanisms and risk factors are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine if the bladder wall structure affects the risk of bladder perforation during T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poletajew, Sławomir, Ilczuk, Tomasz, Krajewski, Wojciech, Niemczyk, Grzegorz, Cyran, Agata, Białek, Łukasz, Radziszewski, Piotr, Górnicka, Barbara, Kryst, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32814580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01992-8
_version_ 1783573016264835072
author Poletajew, Sławomir
Ilczuk, Tomasz
Krajewski, Wojciech
Niemczyk, Grzegorz
Cyran, Agata
Białek, Łukasz
Radziszewski, Piotr
Górnicka, Barbara
Kryst, Piotr
author_facet Poletajew, Sławomir
Ilczuk, Tomasz
Krajewski, Wojciech
Niemczyk, Grzegorz
Cyran, Agata
Białek, Łukasz
Radziszewski, Piotr
Górnicka, Barbara
Kryst, Piotr
author_sort Poletajew, Sławomir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TUR) is associated with a risk of bladder perforation. The underlying mechanisms and risk factors are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine if the bladder wall structure affects the risk of bladder perforation during TUR. METHODS: Fifteen patients who underwent TUR complicated by a bladder perforation (group 1) and fifteen matched controls who underwent uncomplicated TUR (group 2) were retrospectively enrolled in this morphological analysis. Surgical specimens were collected from all participating patients to describe the quality and architecture of urothelium and bladder submucosa. Immunohistochemical studies were performed with primary mouse anti-human E-cadherin, beta-catenin, type IV collagen, cytokeratin 20 and epithelial membrane antigen antibodies. The intensity of the immunohistochemical reaction was assessed using an immunoreactive score (IRS). Ultrastructural examinations were performed by transmission electron microscopy. The microscopic assessment was focused on the intensity of fibrosis in the bladder submucosa and the presence of degenerative changes in the urothelium. RESULTS: Patients’ age, sex distribution, tumour diameters, surgeon experience or cancer stage did not differ between study groups. The immunohistochemical analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences between group 1 and group 2. From a clinical point of view, ultrastructural analysis by electron microscopy showed a higher rate of severe fibrosis in group 1 (63.6% vs. 38.5%), with no differences in the rate and degree of urothelial changes. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Bladder perforation during TUR is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall. Based on available evidence, the surgical technique seems to play the most important role in its prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7439624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74396242020-08-24 Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall Poletajew, Sławomir Ilczuk, Tomasz Krajewski, Wojciech Niemczyk, Grzegorz Cyran, Agata Białek, Łukasz Radziszewski, Piotr Górnicka, Barbara Kryst, Piotr World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TUR) is associated with a risk of bladder perforation. The underlying mechanisms and risk factors are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine if the bladder wall structure affects the risk of bladder perforation during TUR. METHODS: Fifteen patients who underwent TUR complicated by a bladder perforation (group 1) and fifteen matched controls who underwent uncomplicated TUR (group 2) were retrospectively enrolled in this morphological analysis. Surgical specimens were collected from all participating patients to describe the quality and architecture of urothelium and bladder submucosa. Immunohistochemical studies were performed with primary mouse anti-human E-cadherin, beta-catenin, type IV collagen, cytokeratin 20 and epithelial membrane antigen antibodies. The intensity of the immunohistochemical reaction was assessed using an immunoreactive score (IRS). Ultrastructural examinations were performed by transmission electron microscopy. The microscopic assessment was focused on the intensity of fibrosis in the bladder submucosa and the presence of degenerative changes in the urothelium. RESULTS: Patients’ age, sex distribution, tumour diameters, surgeon experience or cancer stage did not differ between study groups. The immunohistochemical analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences between group 1 and group 2. From a clinical point of view, ultrastructural analysis by electron microscopy showed a higher rate of severe fibrosis in group 1 (63.6% vs. 38.5%), with no differences in the rate and degree of urothelial changes. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Bladder perforation during TUR is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall. Based on available evidence, the surgical technique seems to play the most important role in its prevention. BioMed Central 2020-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7439624/ /pubmed/32814580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01992-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Poletajew, Sławomir
Ilczuk, Tomasz
Krajewski, Wojciech
Niemczyk, Grzegorz
Cyran, Agata
Białek, Łukasz
Radziszewski, Piotr
Górnicka, Barbara
Kryst, Piotr
Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall
title Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall
title_full Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall
title_fullStr Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall
title_full_unstemmed Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall
title_short Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall
title_sort bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32814580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01992-8
work_keys_str_mv AT poletajewsławomir bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall
AT ilczuktomasz bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall
AT krajewskiwojciech bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall
AT niemczykgrzegorz bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall
AT cyranagata bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall
AT białekłukasz bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall
AT radziszewskipiotr bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall
AT gornickabarbara bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall
AT krystpiotr bladderperforationduringtransurethralresectionofbladdertumourisnotaresultofadeficientstructureofthebladderwall