Cargando…

Physiological effects of two driving pressure-based methods to set positive end-expiratory pressure during one lung ventilation

During one-lung ventilation (OLV), titrating the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to target a low driving pressure (∆P) could reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. However, it is unclear how to conduct PEEP titration: by stepwise increase starting from zero PEEP (PEEP(INCREMENTAL)) or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spadaro, Savino, Grasso, Salvatore, Karbing, Dan Stieper, Santoro, Giuseppe, Cavallesco, Giorgio, Maniscalco, Pio, Murgolo, Francesca, Di Mussi, Rosa, Ragazzi, Riccardo, Rees, Stephen Edward, Volta, Carlo Alberto, Fogagnolo, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32816177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00582-z
Descripción
Sumario:During one-lung ventilation (OLV), titrating the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to target a low driving pressure (∆P) could reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. However, it is unclear how to conduct PEEP titration: by stepwise increase starting from zero PEEP (PEEP(INCREMENTAL)) or by stepwise decrease after a lung recruiting manoeuvre (PEEP(DECREMENTAL)). In this randomized trial, we compared the physiological effects of these two PEEP titration strategies on respiratory mechanics, ventilation/perfusion mismatch and gas exchange. Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in OLV were randomly assigned to a PEEP(INCREMENTAL) or PEEP(DECREMENTAL) strategy to match the lowest ∆P. In the PEEP(INCREMENTAL) group, PEEP was stepwise titrated from ZEEP up to 16 cm H(2)O, whereas in the PEEP(DECREMENTAL) group PEEP was decrementally titrated, starting from 16 cm H(2)O, immediately after a lung recruiting manoeuvre. Respiratory mechanics, ventilation/perfusion mismatch and blood gas analyses were recorded at baseline, after PEEP titration and at the end of surgery. Sixty patients were included in the study. After PEEP titration, shunt decreased similarly in both groups, from 50 [39–55]% to 35 [28–42]% in the PEEP(INCREMENTAL) and from 45 [37–58]% to 33 [25–45]% in the PEEP(DECREMENTAL) group (both p < 0.001 vs baseline). The resulting ∆P, however, was lower in the PEEP(DECREMENTAL) than in the PEEP(INCREMENTAL) group (8 [7–11] vs 10 [9–11] cm H(2)O; p = 0.03). In the PEEP(DECREMENTAL) group the PaO(2)/ FIO(2) ratio increased significantly after intervention (from 140 [99–176] to 186 [152–243], p < 0.001). Both the PEEP(INCREMENTAL) and the PEEP(DECREMENTAL) strategies were able to decrease intraoperative shunt, but only PEEP(DECREMENTAL) improved oxygenation and lowered intraoperative ΔP. Clinical trial number NCT03635281; August 2018; “retrospectively registered” ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10877-020-00582-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.