Cargando…

Meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-staged management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article was to compare the effectiveness and safety of single-stage (laparoscopic cholecystectomy [LC] plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration [LCBDE]) with two-stage (LC plus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)/endoscopic sphincterotomy [EST])...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhi-Qing, Sun, Ji-Xia, Li, Bin, Dai, Xue-Qiang, Yu, An-Xing, Li, Zhe-Fu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618417
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_146_18
_version_ 1783573085068197888
author Li, Zhi-Qing
Sun, Ji-Xia
Li, Bin
Dai, Xue-Qiang
Yu, An-Xing
Li, Zhe-Fu
author_facet Li, Zhi-Qing
Sun, Ji-Xia
Li, Bin
Dai, Xue-Qiang
Yu, An-Xing
Li, Zhe-Fu
author_sort Li, Zhi-Qing
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article was to compare the effectiveness and safety of single-stage (laparoscopic cholecystectomy [LC] plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration [LCBDE]) with two-stage (LC plus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)/endoscopic sphincterotomy [EST]) in management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct (CBD) stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes following single-stage with two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and CBD stones published from 1990 to 2017 in PubMed, Embase and the Science Citation Index. The primary outcomes were stone clearance from the CBD, post-operative morbidity and mortality. The secondary outcomes were retained stone, conversion to other procedures, length of hospital stay and total operating time. Pooled risk ratio (RR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using either the fixed effects model or random effects model. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs studies were included in this analysis. These studies included a total of 1338 patients: 666 underwent LC + LCBDE and 672 underwent LC + ERCP/EST. The meta-analysis showed that no significant difference was noted between the two groups regarding CBD stone clearance (RR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.99–1.14; P = 0.12), post-operative morbidity (RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.79–1.34; P = 0.81), mortality (RR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.06–1.41; P = 0.13), retained stone (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.57–1.47; P = 0.71), conversion to other procedures (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.55–0.16; P = 0.23), length of hospital stay (WMD: 1.24, 95% CI: 3.57–1.09, P = 0.30), total operating time (WMD: 25.42, 95% CI: 22.38–73.22, P = 0.30). CONCLUSION: Single-stage is efficient and safe in the treatment of patients with concomitant gallstones and CBD stones while avoiding the second procedure. In selected patients, single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and CBD stones might be considered as the preferred approach. However, the findings have to be carefully interpreted due to the existence of heterogeneity, in addition, patient's condition, operator's experience also should be taken into account in making treatment decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7440024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74400242020-08-28 Meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-staged management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones Li, Zhi-Qing Sun, Ji-Xia Li, Bin Dai, Xue-Qiang Yu, An-Xing Li, Zhe-Fu J Minim Access Surg Original Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article was to compare the effectiveness and safety of single-stage (laparoscopic cholecystectomy [LC] plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration [LCBDE]) with two-stage (LC plus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)/endoscopic sphincterotomy [EST]) in management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct (CBD) stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes following single-stage with two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and CBD stones published from 1990 to 2017 in PubMed, Embase and the Science Citation Index. The primary outcomes were stone clearance from the CBD, post-operative morbidity and mortality. The secondary outcomes were retained stone, conversion to other procedures, length of hospital stay and total operating time. Pooled risk ratio (RR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using either the fixed effects model or random effects model. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs studies were included in this analysis. These studies included a total of 1338 patients: 666 underwent LC + LCBDE and 672 underwent LC + ERCP/EST. The meta-analysis showed that no significant difference was noted between the two groups regarding CBD stone clearance (RR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.99–1.14; P = 0.12), post-operative morbidity (RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.79–1.34; P = 0.81), mortality (RR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.06–1.41; P = 0.13), retained stone (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.57–1.47; P = 0.71), conversion to other procedures (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.55–0.16; P = 0.23), length of hospital stay (WMD: 1.24, 95% CI: 3.57–1.09, P = 0.30), total operating time (WMD: 25.42, 95% CI: 22.38–73.22, P = 0.30). CONCLUSION: Single-stage is efficient and safe in the treatment of patients with concomitant gallstones and CBD stones while avoiding the second procedure. In selected patients, single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and CBD stones might be considered as the preferred approach. However, the findings have to be carefully interpreted due to the existence of heterogeneity, in addition, patient's condition, operator's experience also should be taken into account in making treatment decisions. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7440024/ /pubmed/30618417 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_146_18 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Zhi-Qing
Sun, Ji-Xia
Li, Bin
Dai, Xue-Qiang
Yu, An-Xing
Li, Zhe-Fu
Meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-staged management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones
title Meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-staged management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones
title_full Meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-staged management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-staged management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-staged management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones
title_short Meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-staged management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones
title_sort meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-staged management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618417
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_146_18
work_keys_str_mv AT lizhiqing metaanalysisofsinglestageversustwostagedmanagementforconcomitantgallstonesandcommonbileductstones
AT sunjixia metaanalysisofsinglestageversustwostagedmanagementforconcomitantgallstonesandcommonbileductstones
AT libin metaanalysisofsinglestageversustwostagedmanagementforconcomitantgallstonesandcommonbileductstones
AT daixueqiang metaanalysisofsinglestageversustwostagedmanagementforconcomitantgallstonesandcommonbileductstones
AT yuanxing metaanalysisofsinglestageversustwostagedmanagementforconcomitantgallstonesandcommonbileductstones
AT lizhefu metaanalysisofsinglestageversustwostagedmanagementforconcomitantgallstonesandcommonbileductstones