Cargando…

Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Clinical symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) included both motor and nonmotor symptoms. Previous studies indicated inconsistent results for the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor and depression in PD. The study aimed to assess the therapeut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Shuqian, Jiao, Rui, Zhou, Xiaomei, Chen, Shangjie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32358345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019642
_version_ 1783573124547084288
author Li, Shuqian
Jiao, Rui
Zhou, Xiaomei
Chen, Shangjie
author_facet Li, Shuqian
Jiao, Rui
Zhou, Xiaomei
Chen, Shangjie
author_sort Li, Shuqian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) included both motor and nonmotor symptoms. Previous studies indicated inconsistent results for the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor and depression in PD. The study aimed to assess the therapeutic effect of rTMS with different mode on motor and depression in PD using a meta-analysis. METHODS: Articles published before July 2019 were searched based on the following databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar). The therapeutic effects were assessed by computing the standard mean difference (SMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The present study indicated that rTMS showed significant therapeutic effects on motor in PD (SMD 2.05, 95% CI 1.57–2.53, I(2) = 93.0%, P < .001). Both high-frequency (HF)-rTMS and low-frequency rTMS showed therapeutic effects on motor; stimulation over primary motor cortex (M1), supplementary motor area, dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or M1+DLPFC showed therapeutic effects; stimulation during “on” and “off” states showed therapeutic effects; the study showed long-term effect of rTMS on motor in PD. In addition, the study indicated that rTMS showed significant therapeutic effects on depression in PD (SMD 0.80, 95% CI 0.31–1.29, I(2) = 89.1%, P < .001). Stimulation over left DLPFC showed significant therapeutic effects on depression in PD; only HF-rTMS showed therapeutic effects; ages, disease durations, numbers of pulses, and session durations displayed influence on the therapeutic effects of rTMS on depression in PD; the therapeutic effects on depression was long term. However, no significant difference in therapeutic effects on depression were showed between rTMS and oral Fluoxetine (SMD 0.74, 95% CI −0.83 to 2.31, I(2) = 92.5%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The rTMS showed significant therapeutic effects on motor in PD. HF-rTMS showed a significant positive antidepressive effect in PD only over DLPFC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7440210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74402102020-09-04 Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis Li, Shuqian Jiao, Rui Zhou, Xiaomei Chen, Shangjie Medicine (Baltimore) 7000 BACKGROUND: Clinical symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) included both motor and nonmotor symptoms. Previous studies indicated inconsistent results for the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor and depression in PD. The study aimed to assess the therapeutic effect of rTMS with different mode on motor and depression in PD using a meta-analysis. METHODS: Articles published before July 2019 were searched based on the following databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar). The therapeutic effects were assessed by computing the standard mean difference (SMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The present study indicated that rTMS showed significant therapeutic effects on motor in PD (SMD 2.05, 95% CI 1.57–2.53, I(2) = 93.0%, P < .001). Both high-frequency (HF)-rTMS and low-frequency rTMS showed therapeutic effects on motor; stimulation over primary motor cortex (M1), supplementary motor area, dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or M1+DLPFC showed therapeutic effects; stimulation during “on” and “off” states showed therapeutic effects; the study showed long-term effect of rTMS on motor in PD. In addition, the study indicated that rTMS showed significant therapeutic effects on depression in PD (SMD 0.80, 95% CI 0.31–1.29, I(2) = 89.1%, P < .001). Stimulation over left DLPFC showed significant therapeutic effects on depression in PD; only HF-rTMS showed therapeutic effects; ages, disease durations, numbers of pulses, and session durations displayed influence on the therapeutic effects of rTMS on depression in PD; the therapeutic effects on depression was long term. However, no significant difference in therapeutic effects on depression were showed between rTMS and oral Fluoxetine (SMD 0.74, 95% CI −0.83 to 2.31, I(2) = 92.5%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The rTMS showed significant therapeutic effects on motor in PD. HF-rTMS showed a significant positive antidepressive effect in PD only over DLPFC. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7440210/ /pubmed/32358345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019642 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 7000
Li, Shuqian
Jiao, Rui
Zhou, Xiaomei
Chen, Shangjie
Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_full Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_fullStr Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_short Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_sort motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on parkinson disease: a prisma-compliant meta-analysis
topic 7000
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32358345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019642
work_keys_str_mv AT lishuqian motorrecoveryandantidepressanteffectsofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonparkinsondiseaseaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT jiaorui motorrecoveryandantidepressanteffectsofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonparkinsondiseaseaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT zhouxiaomei motorrecoveryandantidepressanteffectsofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonparkinsondiseaseaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT chenshangjie motorrecoveryandantidepressanteffectsofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonparkinsondiseaseaprismacompliantmetaanalysis