Cargando…
Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Clinical symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) included both motor and nonmotor symptoms. Previous studies indicated inconsistent results for the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor and depression in PD. The study aimed to assess the therapeut...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32358345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019642 |
_version_ | 1783573124547084288 |
---|---|
author | Li, Shuqian Jiao, Rui Zhou, Xiaomei Chen, Shangjie |
author_facet | Li, Shuqian Jiao, Rui Zhou, Xiaomei Chen, Shangjie |
author_sort | Li, Shuqian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) included both motor and nonmotor symptoms. Previous studies indicated inconsistent results for the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor and depression in PD. The study aimed to assess the therapeutic effect of rTMS with different mode on motor and depression in PD using a meta-analysis. METHODS: Articles published before July 2019 were searched based on the following databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar). The therapeutic effects were assessed by computing the standard mean difference (SMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The present study indicated that rTMS showed significant therapeutic effects on motor in PD (SMD 2.05, 95% CI 1.57–2.53, I(2) = 93.0%, P < .001). Both high-frequency (HF)-rTMS and low-frequency rTMS showed therapeutic effects on motor; stimulation over primary motor cortex (M1), supplementary motor area, dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or M1+DLPFC showed therapeutic effects; stimulation during “on” and “off” states showed therapeutic effects; the study showed long-term effect of rTMS on motor in PD. In addition, the study indicated that rTMS showed significant therapeutic effects on depression in PD (SMD 0.80, 95% CI 0.31–1.29, I(2) = 89.1%, P < .001). Stimulation over left DLPFC showed significant therapeutic effects on depression in PD; only HF-rTMS showed therapeutic effects; ages, disease durations, numbers of pulses, and session durations displayed influence on the therapeutic effects of rTMS on depression in PD; the therapeutic effects on depression was long term. However, no significant difference in therapeutic effects on depression were showed between rTMS and oral Fluoxetine (SMD 0.74, 95% CI −0.83 to 2.31, I(2) = 92.5%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The rTMS showed significant therapeutic effects on motor in PD. HF-rTMS showed a significant positive antidepressive effect in PD only over DLPFC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7440210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74402102020-09-04 Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis Li, Shuqian Jiao, Rui Zhou, Xiaomei Chen, Shangjie Medicine (Baltimore) 7000 BACKGROUND: Clinical symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) included both motor and nonmotor symptoms. Previous studies indicated inconsistent results for the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor and depression in PD. The study aimed to assess the therapeutic effect of rTMS with different mode on motor and depression in PD using a meta-analysis. METHODS: Articles published before July 2019 were searched based on the following databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar). The therapeutic effects were assessed by computing the standard mean difference (SMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The present study indicated that rTMS showed significant therapeutic effects on motor in PD (SMD 2.05, 95% CI 1.57–2.53, I(2) = 93.0%, P < .001). Both high-frequency (HF)-rTMS and low-frequency rTMS showed therapeutic effects on motor; stimulation over primary motor cortex (M1), supplementary motor area, dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or M1+DLPFC showed therapeutic effects; stimulation during “on” and “off” states showed therapeutic effects; the study showed long-term effect of rTMS on motor in PD. In addition, the study indicated that rTMS showed significant therapeutic effects on depression in PD (SMD 0.80, 95% CI 0.31–1.29, I(2) = 89.1%, P < .001). Stimulation over left DLPFC showed significant therapeutic effects on depression in PD; only HF-rTMS showed therapeutic effects; ages, disease durations, numbers of pulses, and session durations displayed influence on the therapeutic effects of rTMS on depression in PD; the therapeutic effects on depression was long term. However, no significant difference in therapeutic effects on depression were showed between rTMS and oral Fluoxetine (SMD 0.74, 95% CI −0.83 to 2.31, I(2) = 92.5%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The rTMS showed significant therapeutic effects on motor in PD. HF-rTMS showed a significant positive antidepressive effect in PD only over DLPFC. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7440210/ /pubmed/32358345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019642 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 7000 Li, Shuqian Jiao, Rui Zhou, Xiaomei Chen, Shangjie Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis |
title | Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis |
title_full | Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis |
title_short | Motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson disease: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis |
title_sort | motor recovery and antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on parkinson disease: a prisma-compliant meta-analysis |
topic | 7000 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32358345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019642 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lishuqian motorrecoveryandantidepressanteffectsofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonparkinsondiseaseaprismacompliantmetaanalysis AT jiaorui motorrecoveryandantidepressanteffectsofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonparkinsondiseaseaprismacompliantmetaanalysis AT zhouxiaomei motorrecoveryandantidepressanteffectsofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonparkinsondiseaseaprismacompliantmetaanalysis AT chenshangjie motorrecoveryandantidepressanteffectsofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonparkinsondiseaseaprismacompliantmetaanalysis |