Cargando…
Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study
To validate the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer on the survival of patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for 2009 FIGO stage IB carcinomas. We retrospectively identified and reviewed 251 patients treated with radical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32311956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019714 |
_version_ | 1783573129693495296 |
---|---|
author | Zeng, Jing Qu, Pengpeng Hu, Yuanjing Sun, Peisong Qi, Ji Zhao, Guiling Gao, Yan |
author_facet | Zeng, Jing Qu, Pengpeng Hu, Yuanjing Sun, Peisong Qi, Ji Zhao, Guiling Gao, Yan |
author_sort | Zeng, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | To validate the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer on the survival of patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for 2009 FIGO stage IB carcinomas. We retrospectively identified and reviewed 251 patients treated with radical hysterectomy for 2009 FIGO stage IB cervical carcinomas from January 2011 to December 2016. The re-staged IB cohort consisted of 2018 FIGO stage IB1 (tumor size <2 cm), IB2 (2–3.9 cm), IB3 (≥4 cm), and IIIC1p (any pelvic nodal metastasis) cervical cancer. The univariate log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression models were performed for all potential clinic pathological risk factors based on cancer stage. On re-staging the 251 patients with 2009 FIGO stage IB using the 2018 FIGO staging system, 96 patients (38.2%) had stage IB1, 109 patients (43.4%) had stage IB2, 28 patients (11.2%) had stage IB3, and 18 patients (7.2%) had stage IIIC1p. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with 2018 FIGO stage IB1, IB2, IB3, and IIIC1p were 97.9%, 92.7%, 78.6%, and 61.1%, respectively. The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 97.9%, 92.7%,63.7%, and 20.8%, respectively. Factors significantly affecting OS and disease-free survival were 2018 FIGO stage≥IB3, histologic grade 2–3, and lymph node involvement. The revised 2018 FIGO staging system seemed to accurately reflect the survival rate, with a distinct statistical tendency for poorer 5-year disease-free survival and OS rates with increasing stage. Women with positive lymph nodes in this classification were classified as having stage IIIC disease, which can achieve more realistic survival results than the previous staging system. The prognostic discrimination of histologic grade should be considered when revising the staging system in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7440235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74402352020-09-04 Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study Zeng, Jing Qu, Pengpeng Hu, Yuanjing Sun, Peisong Qi, Ji Zhao, Guiling Gao, Yan Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 To validate the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer on the survival of patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for 2009 FIGO stage IB carcinomas. We retrospectively identified and reviewed 251 patients treated with radical hysterectomy for 2009 FIGO stage IB cervical carcinomas from January 2011 to December 2016. The re-staged IB cohort consisted of 2018 FIGO stage IB1 (tumor size <2 cm), IB2 (2–3.9 cm), IB3 (≥4 cm), and IIIC1p (any pelvic nodal metastasis) cervical cancer. The univariate log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression models were performed for all potential clinic pathological risk factors based on cancer stage. On re-staging the 251 patients with 2009 FIGO stage IB using the 2018 FIGO staging system, 96 patients (38.2%) had stage IB1, 109 patients (43.4%) had stage IB2, 28 patients (11.2%) had stage IB3, and 18 patients (7.2%) had stage IIIC1p. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with 2018 FIGO stage IB1, IB2, IB3, and IIIC1p were 97.9%, 92.7%, 78.6%, and 61.1%, respectively. The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 97.9%, 92.7%,63.7%, and 20.8%, respectively. Factors significantly affecting OS and disease-free survival were 2018 FIGO stage≥IB3, histologic grade 2–3, and lymph node involvement. The revised 2018 FIGO staging system seemed to accurately reflect the survival rate, with a distinct statistical tendency for poorer 5-year disease-free survival and OS rates with increasing stage. Women with positive lymph nodes in this classification were classified as having stage IIIC disease, which can achieve more realistic survival results than the previous staging system. The prognostic discrimination of histologic grade should be considered when revising the staging system in the future. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7440235/ /pubmed/32311956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019714 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5700 Zeng, Jing Qu, Pengpeng Hu, Yuanjing Sun, Peisong Qi, Ji Zhao, Guiling Gao, Yan Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study |
title | Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study |
title_full | Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study |
title_short | Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study |
title_sort | clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 international federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging ib: a single center retrospective study |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32311956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zengjing clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT qupengpeng clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT huyuanjing clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT sunpeisong clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT qiji clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT zhaoguiling clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT gaoyan clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy |