Cargando…

Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study

To validate the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer on the survival of patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for 2009 FIGO stage IB carcinomas. We retrospectively identified and reviewed 251 patients treated with radical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Jing, Qu, Pengpeng, Hu, Yuanjing, Sun, Peisong, Qi, Ji, Zhao, Guiling, Gao, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32311956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019714
_version_ 1783573129693495296
author Zeng, Jing
Qu, Pengpeng
Hu, Yuanjing
Sun, Peisong
Qi, Ji
Zhao, Guiling
Gao, Yan
author_facet Zeng, Jing
Qu, Pengpeng
Hu, Yuanjing
Sun, Peisong
Qi, Ji
Zhao, Guiling
Gao, Yan
author_sort Zeng, Jing
collection PubMed
description To validate the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer on the survival of patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for 2009 FIGO stage IB carcinomas. We retrospectively identified and reviewed 251 patients treated with radical hysterectomy for 2009 FIGO stage IB cervical carcinomas from January 2011 to December 2016. The re-staged IB cohort consisted of 2018 FIGO stage IB1 (tumor size <2 cm), IB2 (2–3.9 cm), IB3 (≥4 cm), and IIIC1p (any pelvic nodal metastasis) cervical cancer. The univariate log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression models were performed for all potential clinic pathological risk factors based on cancer stage. On re-staging the 251 patients with 2009 FIGO stage IB using the 2018 FIGO staging system, 96 patients (38.2%) had stage IB1, 109 patients (43.4%) had stage IB2, 28 patients (11.2%) had stage IB3, and 18 patients (7.2%) had stage IIIC1p. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with 2018 FIGO stage IB1, IB2, IB3, and IIIC1p were 97.9%, 92.7%, 78.6%, and 61.1%, respectively. The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 97.9%, 92.7%,63.7%, and 20.8%, respectively. Factors significantly affecting OS and disease-free survival were 2018 FIGO stage≥IB3, histologic grade 2–3, and lymph node involvement. The revised 2018 FIGO staging system seemed to accurately reflect the survival rate, with a distinct statistical tendency for poorer 5-year disease-free survival and OS rates with increasing stage. Women with positive lymph nodes in this classification were classified as having stage IIIC disease, which can achieve more realistic survival results than the previous staging system. The prognostic discrimination of histologic grade should be considered when revising the staging system in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7440235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74402352020-09-04 Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study Zeng, Jing Qu, Pengpeng Hu, Yuanjing Sun, Peisong Qi, Ji Zhao, Guiling Gao, Yan Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 To validate the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer on the survival of patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for 2009 FIGO stage IB carcinomas. We retrospectively identified and reviewed 251 patients treated with radical hysterectomy for 2009 FIGO stage IB cervical carcinomas from January 2011 to December 2016. The re-staged IB cohort consisted of 2018 FIGO stage IB1 (tumor size <2 cm), IB2 (2–3.9 cm), IB3 (≥4 cm), and IIIC1p (any pelvic nodal metastasis) cervical cancer. The univariate log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression models were performed for all potential clinic pathological risk factors based on cancer stage. On re-staging the 251 patients with 2009 FIGO stage IB using the 2018 FIGO staging system, 96 patients (38.2%) had stage IB1, 109 patients (43.4%) had stage IB2, 28 patients (11.2%) had stage IB3, and 18 patients (7.2%) had stage IIIC1p. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with 2018 FIGO stage IB1, IB2, IB3, and IIIC1p were 97.9%, 92.7%, 78.6%, and 61.1%, respectively. The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 97.9%, 92.7%,63.7%, and 20.8%, respectively. Factors significantly affecting OS and disease-free survival were 2018 FIGO stage≥IB3, histologic grade 2–3, and lymph node involvement. The revised 2018 FIGO staging system seemed to accurately reflect the survival rate, with a distinct statistical tendency for poorer 5-year disease-free survival and OS rates with increasing stage. Women with positive lymph nodes in this classification were classified as having stage IIIC disease, which can achieve more realistic survival results than the previous staging system. The prognostic discrimination of histologic grade should be considered when revising the staging system in the future. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7440235/ /pubmed/32311956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019714 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Zeng, Jing
Qu, Pengpeng
Hu, Yuanjing
Sun, Peisong
Qi, Ji
Zhao, Guiling
Gao, Yan
Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study
title Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study
title_full Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study
title_fullStr Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study
title_short Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study
title_sort clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 international federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging ib: a single center retrospective study
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32311956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019714
work_keys_str_mv AT zengjing clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT qupengpeng clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT huyuanjing clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT sunpeisong clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT qiji clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhaoguiling clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT gaoyan clinicopathologicalriskfactorsinthelightoftherevised2018internationalfederationofgynecologyandobstetricsstagingsystemforearlycervicalcancerwithstagingibasinglecenterretrospectivestudy