Cargando…

Benefits and effectiveness of using a wrist heart rate monitor as a telerehabilitation device in cardiac patients: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Telerehabilitation in cardiology has the potential to become the alternative to regular outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Our study focuses on the wrist heart rate monitor as a telerehabilitation device, defines detected limitations, and compares results between home-based and regular o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batalik, Ladislav, Dosbaba, Filip, Hartman, Martin, Batalikova, Katerina, Spinar, Jindrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32176113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019556
_version_ 1783573140967784448
author Batalik, Ladislav
Dosbaba, Filip
Hartman, Martin
Batalikova, Katerina
Spinar, Jindrich
author_facet Batalik, Ladislav
Dosbaba, Filip
Hartman, Martin
Batalikova, Katerina
Spinar, Jindrich
author_sort Batalik, Ladislav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Telerehabilitation in cardiology has the potential to become the alternative to regular outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Our study focuses on the wrist heart rate monitor as a telerehabilitation device, defines detected limitations, and compares results between home-based and regular outpatient rehabilitation methods, related to physical fitness, quality of life, and training adherence. The study design was a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Eligible 56 cardiac rehabilitation patients were randomized into a 12-week regular outpatient training group (ROT) and interventional home-based telerehabilitation group (ITG). For both groups, the intensity of the training was prescribed to be performed at 70% to 80% of heart rate reserve for 60 minutes, 3 times a week. The ITG patients started their training with a wrist heart rate monitor in their home environment. These patients received feedback once a week, reflecting data uploaded on the internet application. The ROT patients performed their exercise under the direct supervision of a physical specialist in a regular outpatient clinic. Physical fitness and health-related quality of life were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks. Training adherence in both groups was determined and compared. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients comleted the intervention (91%); no serious adverse events were recorded. Physical fitness expressed as peak oxygen uptake showed significant improvement (P < .001) in ROT group from 23.4 ± 3.3 to 25.9 ± 4.1 mL/kg/min and (P < .01) in ITG group from 23.7 ± 4.1 to 26.5 ± 5.7 mL/kg/min without significant between-group differences after 12 weeks of intervention. The training adherence between groups was similar. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that telerehabilitation via wrist heart rate monitor could become an alternative kind of cardiac rehabilitation which deserves attention and further analyzing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7440288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74402882020-09-04 Benefits and effectiveness of using a wrist heart rate monitor as a telerehabilitation device in cardiac patients: A randomized controlled trial Batalik, Ladislav Dosbaba, Filip Hartman, Martin Batalikova, Katerina Spinar, Jindrich Medicine (Baltimore) 6300 BACKGROUND: Telerehabilitation in cardiology has the potential to become the alternative to regular outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Our study focuses on the wrist heart rate monitor as a telerehabilitation device, defines detected limitations, and compares results between home-based and regular outpatient rehabilitation methods, related to physical fitness, quality of life, and training adherence. The study design was a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Eligible 56 cardiac rehabilitation patients were randomized into a 12-week regular outpatient training group (ROT) and interventional home-based telerehabilitation group (ITG). For both groups, the intensity of the training was prescribed to be performed at 70% to 80% of heart rate reserve for 60 minutes, 3 times a week. The ITG patients started their training with a wrist heart rate monitor in their home environment. These patients received feedback once a week, reflecting data uploaded on the internet application. The ROT patients performed their exercise under the direct supervision of a physical specialist in a regular outpatient clinic. Physical fitness and health-related quality of life were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks. Training adherence in both groups was determined and compared. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients comleted the intervention (91%); no serious adverse events were recorded. Physical fitness expressed as peak oxygen uptake showed significant improvement (P < .001) in ROT group from 23.4 ± 3.3 to 25.9 ± 4.1 mL/kg/min and (P < .01) in ITG group from 23.7 ± 4.1 to 26.5 ± 5.7 mL/kg/min without significant between-group differences after 12 weeks of intervention. The training adherence between groups was similar. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that telerehabilitation via wrist heart rate monitor could become an alternative kind of cardiac rehabilitation which deserves attention and further analyzing. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7440288/ /pubmed/32176113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019556 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 6300
Batalik, Ladislav
Dosbaba, Filip
Hartman, Martin
Batalikova, Katerina
Spinar, Jindrich
Benefits and effectiveness of using a wrist heart rate monitor as a telerehabilitation device in cardiac patients: A randomized controlled trial
title Benefits and effectiveness of using a wrist heart rate monitor as a telerehabilitation device in cardiac patients: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Benefits and effectiveness of using a wrist heart rate monitor as a telerehabilitation device in cardiac patients: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Benefits and effectiveness of using a wrist heart rate monitor as a telerehabilitation device in cardiac patients: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Benefits and effectiveness of using a wrist heart rate monitor as a telerehabilitation device in cardiac patients: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Benefits and effectiveness of using a wrist heart rate monitor as a telerehabilitation device in cardiac patients: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort benefits and effectiveness of using a wrist heart rate monitor as a telerehabilitation device in cardiac patients: a randomized controlled trial
topic 6300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32176113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019556
work_keys_str_mv AT batalikladislav benefitsandeffectivenessofusingawristheartratemonitorasatelerehabilitationdeviceincardiacpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dosbabafilip benefitsandeffectivenessofusingawristheartratemonitorasatelerehabilitationdeviceincardiacpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hartmanmartin benefitsandeffectivenessofusingawristheartratemonitorasatelerehabilitationdeviceincardiacpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT batalikovakaterina benefitsandeffectivenessofusingawristheartratemonitorasatelerehabilitationdeviceincardiacpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT spinarjindrich benefitsandeffectivenessofusingawristheartratemonitorasatelerehabilitationdeviceincardiacpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial