Cargando…

Going smoke-free: University staff and students’ qualitative views about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke-free policy

BACKGROUND: Despite many Australian universities introducing smoke-free policies on campus, there is little information about staff and students understanding of smoking on campus in the context of the implementation of a smoke-free policy. OBJECTIVE: This research explores the qualitative views of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sendall, Marguerite C., Le Lievre, Chantal, McCosker, Laura K., Brewis, Lauren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32817644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236989
_version_ 1783573159718420480
author Sendall, Marguerite C.
Le Lievre, Chantal
McCosker, Laura K.
Brewis, Lauren
author_facet Sendall, Marguerite C.
Le Lievre, Chantal
McCosker, Laura K.
Brewis, Lauren
author_sort Sendall, Marguerite C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite many Australian universities introducing smoke-free policies on campus, there is little information about staff and students understanding of smoking on campus in the context of the implementation of a smoke-free policy. OBJECTIVE: This research explores the qualitative views of university staff and students about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke-free policy. METHODS: In 2016, an electronic survey was distributed to all current staff and students of a large university in Queensland, Australia during the implementation of a smoke-free policy. The survey consisted of multiple-choice questions about demographics, tobacco use, attitudes towards smoking, awareness of and attitudes towards the policy, and intentions to quit smoking. The final question asked for a short, open-ended response: “Would you like to comment on the issue of smoking on QUT* campuses?” This question was extracted from the survey and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. This paper reports the findings from this question. *Queensland University of Technology. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 641 staff and students. There were 351 responses to the final question. Five inductive themes emerged about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke-free policy: 1) the watering down of the policy, if it is not enforced, 2) the creation of hot spots on campus boundaries affecting those who pass by, 3) concern, especially by those who don’t smoke, about the impact on smokers emotional health and welfare, 4) disagreement about the value of designated smoking areas and 5) suggestions about how to better implement the policy. CONCLUSION: Overall, participants views about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke free policy suggest broad agreement but reflect concerns about enforcement, boundaries, non-smokers and designated areas. Consistent and systematic processes for implementation, maintenance and enforcement of policy goals, and cessation support, is needed to create a non-smoking culture on university campuses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7440621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74406212020-08-26 Going smoke-free: University staff and students’ qualitative views about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke-free policy Sendall, Marguerite C. Le Lievre, Chantal McCosker, Laura K. Brewis, Lauren PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite many Australian universities introducing smoke-free policies on campus, there is little information about staff and students understanding of smoking on campus in the context of the implementation of a smoke-free policy. OBJECTIVE: This research explores the qualitative views of university staff and students about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke-free policy. METHODS: In 2016, an electronic survey was distributed to all current staff and students of a large university in Queensland, Australia during the implementation of a smoke-free policy. The survey consisted of multiple-choice questions about demographics, tobacco use, attitudes towards smoking, awareness of and attitudes towards the policy, and intentions to quit smoking. The final question asked for a short, open-ended response: “Would you like to comment on the issue of smoking on QUT* campuses?” This question was extracted from the survey and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. This paper reports the findings from this question. *Queensland University of Technology. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 641 staff and students. There were 351 responses to the final question. Five inductive themes emerged about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke-free policy: 1) the watering down of the policy, if it is not enforced, 2) the creation of hot spots on campus boundaries affecting those who pass by, 3) concern, especially by those who don’t smoke, about the impact on smokers emotional health and welfare, 4) disagreement about the value of designated smoking areas and 5) suggestions about how to better implement the policy. CONCLUSION: Overall, participants views about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke free policy suggest broad agreement but reflect concerns about enforcement, boundaries, non-smokers and designated areas. Consistent and systematic processes for implementation, maintenance and enforcement of policy goals, and cessation support, is needed to create a non-smoking culture on university campuses. Public Library of Science 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7440621/ /pubmed/32817644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236989 Text en © 2020 Sendall et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sendall, Marguerite C.
Le Lievre, Chantal
McCosker, Laura K.
Brewis, Lauren
Going smoke-free: University staff and students’ qualitative views about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke-free policy
title Going smoke-free: University staff and students’ qualitative views about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke-free policy
title_full Going smoke-free: University staff and students’ qualitative views about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke-free policy
title_fullStr Going smoke-free: University staff and students’ qualitative views about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke-free policy
title_full_unstemmed Going smoke-free: University staff and students’ qualitative views about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke-free policy
title_short Going smoke-free: University staff and students’ qualitative views about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke-free policy
title_sort going smoke-free: university staff and students’ qualitative views about smoking on campus during the implementation of a smoke-free policy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32817644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236989
work_keys_str_mv AT sendallmargueritec goingsmokefreeuniversitystaffandstudentsqualitativeviewsaboutsmokingoncampusduringtheimplementationofasmokefreepolicy
AT lelievrechantal goingsmokefreeuniversitystaffandstudentsqualitativeviewsaboutsmokingoncampusduringtheimplementationofasmokefreepolicy
AT mccoskerlaurak goingsmokefreeuniversitystaffandstudentsqualitativeviewsaboutsmokingoncampusduringtheimplementationofasmokefreepolicy
AT brewislauren goingsmokefreeuniversitystaffandstudentsqualitativeviewsaboutsmokingoncampusduringtheimplementationofasmokefreepolicy