Cargando…
Interdisziplinäre multimodale Schmerztherapie unter den Schutzmaßnahmen der COVID-19-Pandemie: Analyse und Erfahrungsbericht
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, elective medical services have had to be reduced to a minimum, which has also affected care in pain medicine. Following these drastic cutbacks, a cautious resumption of elective care is planned. This also applies to the delivery of inpatient and day-care interdisciplina...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32820359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00482-020-00491-9 |
Sumario: | Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, elective medical services have had to be reduced to a minimum, which has also affected care in pain medicine. Following these drastic cutbacks, a cautious resumption of elective care is planned. This also applies to the delivery of inpatient and day-care interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT). Since the majority of pain medicine centers have been closed to date, the question has arisen as to whether a resumption of regular care can be easily provided under the required protective measures. To answer this question, the authors conducted a survey among patients that were in a position to make a direct comparison between IMPT under normal conditions as well as under the currently required protective measures. The survey recorded the level of disruption caused by the different protective measures in the various treatment modules. An evaluation of the questionnaires, which were completed by two patient groups and all therapists involved, revealed that interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy is possible without significant impairments even under the required protective measures. In particular, wearing protective masks proved to be the protective measure with the greatest negative impact. However, options like the use of protective visors or relocating treatment modules to the outdoors offer practicable alternative solutions for protection. Both patient and therapist satisfaction was high despite these constraints, and personal concern regarding possible infection low. |
---|