Cargando…

Multimorbidity and patient-reported diagnostic errors in the primary care setting: multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan

OBJECTIVES: There is lack of evidence for the association between multimorbidity and diagnostic errors. Information on diagnostic errors from patients’ perspectives is crucial to improve the diagnostic process. In this study, we aimed to investigate patient-reported diagnostic errors and to examine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aoki, Takuya, Watanuki, Satoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32819954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039040
_version_ 1783573174574645248
author Aoki, Takuya
Watanuki, Satoshi
author_facet Aoki, Takuya
Watanuki, Satoshi
author_sort Aoki, Takuya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: There is lack of evidence for the association between multimorbidity and diagnostic errors. Information on diagnostic errors from patients’ perspectives is crucial to improve the diagnostic process. In this study, we aimed to investigate patient-reported diagnostic errors and to examine the relationship between multimorbidity and patient-reported diagnostic errors in the primary care setting. DESIGN: Multicentre cross-sectional study. SETTING: A primary care practice-based research network in Japan (25 primary care facilities). PARTICIPANTS: Adult outpatients filled out a standardised questionnaire. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient-reported diagnostic errors. RESULTS: Data collected from 1474 primary care outpatients were analysed. The number of participants who reported diagnostic errors was 57 (3.9%). Most of the missed diagnoses were common conditions in primary care, such as cancer, dermatitis and hypertension. After adjustment for possible confounders and clustering within facilities, multimorbidity was positively associated with patient-reported diagnostic errors (adjusted OR=1.83, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.31). The results of the sensitivity analysis were consistent with those of the primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed a lower proportion of patients reporting experiences of diagnostic errors in primary care than those reported in previous studies in other countries. However, patients with multimorbidity are more likely to report diagnostic errors in primary care; thus, further research is necessary to improve the diagnostic process for patients with multimorbidity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7440713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74407132020-08-28 Multimorbidity and patient-reported diagnostic errors in the primary care setting: multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan Aoki, Takuya Watanuki, Satoshi BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: There is lack of evidence for the association between multimorbidity and diagnostic errors. Information on diagnostic errors from patients’ perspectives is crucial to improve the diagnostic process. In this study, we aimed to investigate patient-reported diagnostic errors and to examine the relationship between multimorbidity and patient-reported diagnostic errors in the primary care setting. DESIGN: Multicentre cross-sectional study. SETTING: A primary care practice-based research network in Japan (25 primary care facilities). PARTICIPANTS: Adult outpatients filled out a standardised questionnaire. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient-reported diagnostic errors. RESULTS: Data collected from 1474 primary care outpatients were analysed. The number of participants who reported diagnostic errors was 57 (3.9%). Most of the missed diagnoses were common conditions in primary care, such as cancer, dermatitis and hypertension. After adjustment for possible confounders and clustering within facilities, multimorbidity was positively associated with patient-reported diagnostic errors (adjusted OR=1.83, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.31). The results of the sensitivity analysis were consistent with those of the primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed a lower proportion of patients reporting experiences of diagnostic errors in primary care than those reported in previous studies in other countries. However, patients with multimorbidity are more likely to report diagnostic errors in primary care; thus, further research is necessary to improve the diagnostic process for patients with multimorbidity. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7440713/ /pubmed/32819954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039040 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Aoki, Takuya
Watanuki, Satoshi
Multimorbidity and patient-reported diagnostic errors in the primary care setting: multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan
title Multimorbidity and patient-reported diagnostic errors in the primary care setting: multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan
title_full Multimorbidity and patient-reported diagnostic errors in the primary care setting: multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan
title_fullStr Multimorbidity and patient-reported diagnostic errors in the primary care setting: multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Multimorbidity and patient-reported diagnostic errors in the primary care setting: multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan
title_short Multimorbidity and patient-reported diagnostic errors in the primary care setting: multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan
title_sort multimorbidity and patient-reported diagnostic errors in the primary care setting: multicentre cross-sectional study in japan
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32819954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039040
work_keys_str_mv AT aokitakuya multimorbidityandpatientreporteddiagnosticerrorsintheprimarycaresettingmulticentrecrosssectionalstudyinjapan
AT watanukisatoshi multimorbidityandpatientreporteddiagnosticerrorsintheprimarycaresettingmulticentrecrosssectionalstudyinjapan