Cargando…

Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews

OBJECTIVE: Patients’ expectations—as a central mechanism of placebo and nocebo effects—are an important predictor of health outcomes. However, the lack of a way to assess expectations across different settings restricts progress in understanding the role of expectations and to quantify their importa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alberts, Jannis, Löwe, Bernd, Glahn, Maja Alicia, Petrie, Keith, Laferton, Johannes, Nestoriuc, Yvonne, Shedden-Mora, Meike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32819942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036169
_version_ 1783573190876856320
author Alberts, Jannis
Löwe, Bernd
Glahn, Maja Alicia
Petrie, Keith
Laferton, Johannes
Nestoriuc, Yvonne
Shedden-Mora, Meike
author_facet Alberts, Jannis
Löwe, Bernd
Glahn, Maja Alicia
Petrie, Keith
Laferton, Johannes
Nestoriuc, Yvonne
Shedden-Mora, Meike
author_sort Alberts, Jannis
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Patients’ expectations—as a central mechanism of placebo and nocebo effects—are an important predictor of health outcomes. However, the lack of a way to assess expectations across different settings restricts progress in understanding the role of expectations and to quantify their importance in medical and psychological treatments. The aim of this study was to develop a theory-based, generic, multidimensional measure assessing patient expectations of medical and psychological treatments. DESIGN: The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) was developed based on the integrative model of expectations and a systematic literature review of treatment expectation scales. After creating a comprehensive item pool, the scale was further refined by use of expert ratings and patient interviews. SETTING: Patients were recruited in primary care at two hospitals in Hamburg, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 13 scientific experts participated in the expert survey. 11 patients waiting for psychological or surgical treatments participated in the qualitative interviews. RESULTS: The 2×2×2 multidimensional structure of the TEX-Q assesses two expectation constructs (probabilistic vs value-based) across two outcome domains with two valences (direct benefits and adverse events, broader positive and negative impact), plus process and behavioural control expectations. We examined 583 items from 38 scales identified in the systematic review and developed 78 initial items. Content validity was then rated by experts according to item fit and comprehensibility. The best 53 items were further evaluated for comprehensibility, acceptability, phrasing preference and understanding by interviewing patients prior to treatment using the ‘think aloud’ technique. This resulted in a first 35-item version of the TEX-Q. CONCLUSIONS: The TEX-Q is a generic, multidimensional measure to assess patient expectations of medical and psychological treatments and allows comparison of the impact of multidimensional expectations across different conditions. The final TEX-Q will be available after psychometric validation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7440833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74408332020-08-28 Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews Alberts, Jannis Löwe, Bernd Glahn, Maja Alicia Petrie, Keith Laferton, Johannes Nestoriuc, Yvonne Shedden-Mora, Meike BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVE: Patients’ expectations—as a central mechanism of placebo and nocebo effects—are an important predictor of health outcomes. However, the lack of a way to assess expectations across different settings restricts progress in understanding the role of expectations and to quantify their importance in medical and psychological treatments. The aim of this study was to develop a theory-based, generic, multidimensional measure assessing patient expectations of medical and psychological treatments. DESIGN: The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) was developed based on the integrative model of expectations and a systematic literature review of treatment expectation scales. After creating a comprehensive item pool, the scale was further refined by use of expert ratings and patient interviews. SETTING: Patients were recruited in primary care at two hospitals in Hamburg, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 13 scientific experts participated in the expert survey. 11 patients waiting for psychological or surgical treatments participated in the qualitative interviews. RESULTS: The 2×2×2 multidimensional structure of the TEX-Q assesses two expectation constructs (probabilistic vs value-based) across two outcome domains with two valences (direct benefits and adverse events, broader positive and negative impact), plus process and behavioural control expectations. We examined 583 items from 38 scales identified in the systematic review and developed 78 initial items. Content validity was then rated by experts according to item fit and comprehensibility. The best 53 items were further evaluated for comprehensibility, acceptability, phrasing preference and understanding by interviewing patients prior to treatment using the ‘think aloud’ technique. This resulted in a first 35-item version of the TEX-Q. CONCLUSIONS: The TEX-Q is a generic, multidimensional measure to assess patient expectations of medical and psychological treatments and allows comparison of the impact of multidimensional expectations across different conditions. The final TEX-Q will be available after psychometric validation. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7440833/ /pubmed/32819942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036169 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Global Health
Alberts, Jannis
Löwe, Bernd
Glahn, Maja Alicia
Petrie, Keith
Laferton, Johannes
Nestoriuc, Yvonne
Shedden-Mora, Meike
Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews
title Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews
title_full Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews
title_fullStr Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews
title_full_unstemmed Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews
title_short Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews
title_sort development of the generic, multidimensional treatment expectation questionnaire (tex-q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32819942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036169
work_keys_str_mv AT albertsjannis developmentofthegenericmultidimensionaltreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqthroughsystematicliteraturereviewexpertsurveysandqualitativeinterviews
AT lowebernd developmentofthegenericmultidimensionaltreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqthroughsystematicliteraturereviewexpertsurveysandqualitativeinterviews
AT glahnmajaalicia developmentofthegenericmultidimensionaltreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqthroughsystematicliteraturereviewexpertsurveysandqualitativeinterviews
AT petriekeith developmentofthegenericmultidimensionaltreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqthroughsystematicliteraturereviewexpertsurveysandqualitativeinterviews
AT lafertonjohannes developmentofthegenericmultidimensionaltreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqthroughsystematicliteraturereviewexpertsurveysandqualitativeinterviews
AT nestoriucyvonne developmentofthegenericmultidimensionaltreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqthroughsystematicliteraturereviewexpertsurveysandqualitativeinterviews
AT sheddenmorameike developmentofthegenericmultidimensionaltreatmentexpectationquestionnairetexqthroughsystematicliteraturereviewexpertsurveysandqualitativeinterviews