Cargando…
C57BL/6J substrain differences in response to high-fat diet intervention
C57BL/6J-related mouse strains are widely used animal models for diet-induced obesity (DIO). Multiple vendors breed C57BL/6J-related substrains which may introduce genetic drift and environmental confounders such as microbiome differences. To address potential vendor/substrain specific effects, we c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7441320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32820201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70765-w |
_version_ | 1783573274781810688 |
---|---|
author | Siersbæk, Majken Storm Ditzel, Nicholas Hejbøl, Eva Kildall Præstholm, Stine Marie Markussen, Lasse Kruse Avolio, Fabio Li, Lingzi Lehtonen, Lasse Hansen, Axel Kornerup Schrøder, Henrik Daa Krych, Lukasz Mandrup, Susanne Langhorn, Louise Bollen, Peter Grøntved, Lars |
author_facet | Siersbæk, Majken Storm Ditzel, Nicholas Hejbøl, Eva Kildall Præstholm, Stine Marie Markussen, Lasse Kruse Avolio, Fabio Li, Lingzi Lehtonen, Lasse Hansen, Axel Kornerup Schrøder, Henrik Daa Krych, Lukasz Mandrup, Susanne Langhorn, Louise Bollen, Peter Grøntved, Lars |
author_sort | Siersbæk, Majken Storm |
collection | PubMed |
description | C57BL/6J-related mouse strains are widely used animal models for diet-induced obesity (DIO). Multiple vendors breed C57BL/6J-related substrains which may introduce genetic drift and environmental confounders such as microbiome differences. To address potential vendor/substrain specific effects, we compared DIO of C57BL/6J-related substrains from three different vendors: C57BL/6J (Charles Rivers), C57BL/6JBomTac (Taconic Bioscience) and C57BL/6JRj (Janvier). After local acclimatization, DIO was induced by either a high-fat diet (HFD, 60% energy from fat) or western diet (WD, 42% energy from fat supplemented with fructose in the drinking water). All three groups on HFD gained a similar amount of total body weight, yet the relative amount of fat percentage and mass of inguinal- and epididymal white adipose tissue (iWAT and eWAT) was lower in C57BL/6JBomTac compared to the two other C57BL/6J-releated substrains. In contrast to HFD, the three groups on WD responded differently in terms of body weight gain, where C57BL/6J was particularly prone to WD. This was associated with a relative higher amount of eWAT, iWAT, and liver triglycerides. Although the HFD and WD had significant impact on the microbiota, we did not observe any major differences between the three groups of mice. Together, these data demonstrate significant differences in HFD- and WD-induced adiposity in C57BL/6J-related substrains, which should be considered in the design of animal DIO studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7441320 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74413202020-08-26 C57BL/6J substrain differences in response to high-fat diet intervention Siersbæk, Majken Storm Ditzel, Nicholas Hejbøl, Eva Kildall Præstholm, Stine Marie Markussen, Lasse Kruse Avolio, Fabio Li, Lingzi Lehtonen, Lasse Hansen, Axel Kornerup Schrøder, Henrik Daa Krych, Lukasz Mandrup, Susanne Langhorn, Louise Bollen, Peter Grøntved, Lars Sci Rep Article C57BL/6J-related mouse strains are widely used animal models for diet-induced obesity (DIO). Multiple vendors breed C57BL/6J-related substrains which may introduce genetic drift and environmental confounders such as microbiome differences. To address potential vendor/substrain specific effects, we compared DIO of C57BL/6J-related substrains from three different vendors: C57BL/6J (Charles Rivers), C57BL/6JBomTac (Taconic Bioscience) and C57BL/6JRj (Janvier). After local acclimatization, DIO was induced by either a high-fat diet (HFD, 60% energy from fat) or western diet (WD, 42% energy from fat supplemented with fructose in the drinking water). All three groups on HFD gained a similar amount of total body weight, yet the relative amount of fat percentage and mass of inguinal- and epididymal white adipose tissue (iWAT and eWAT) was lower in C57BL/6JBomTac compared to the two other C57BL/6J-releated substrains. In contrast to HFD, the three groups on WD responded differently in terms of body weight gain, where C57BL/6J was particularly prone to WD. This was associated with a relative higher amount of eWAT, iWAT, and liver triglycerides. Although the HFD and WD had significant impact on the microbiota, we did not observe any major differences between the three groups of mice. Together, these data demonstrate significant differences in HFD- and WD-induced adiposity in C57BL/6J-related substrains, which should be considered in the design of animal DIO studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7441320/ /pubmed/32820201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70765-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Siersbæk, Majken Storm Ditzel, Nicholas Hejbøl, Eva Kildall Præstholm, Stine Marie Markussen, Lasse Kruse Avolio, Fabio Li, Lingzi Lehtonen, Lasse Hansen, Axel Kornerup Schrøder, Henrik Daa Krych, Lukasz Mandrup, Susanne Langhorn, Louise Bollen, Peter Grøntved, Lars C57BL/6J substrain differences in response to high-fat diet intervention |
title | C57BL/6J substrain differences in response to high-fat diet intervention |
title_full | C57BL/6J substrain differences in response to high-fat diet intervention |
title_fullStr | C57BL/6J substrain differences in response to high-fat diet intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | C57BL/6J substrain differences in response to high-fat diet intervention |
title_short | C57BL/6J substrain differences in response to high-fat diet intervention |
title_sort | c57bl/6j substrain differences in response to high-fat diet intervention |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7441320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32820201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70765-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siersbækmajkenstorm c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT ditzelnicholas c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT hejbølevakildall c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT præstholmstinemarie c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT markussenlassekruse c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT avoliofabio c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT lilingzi c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT lehtonenlasse c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT hansenaxelkornerup c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT schrøderhenrikdaa c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT krychlukasz c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT mandrupsusanne c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT langhornlouise c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT bollenpeter c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention AT grøntvedlars c57bl6jsubstraindifferencesinresponsetohighfatdietintervention |