Cargando…
A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping
BACKGROUND: The implementation of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) as an intervention to foster clinical practice change is affected by many factors. Key factors include those associated with behavioral change and those associated with technology acceptance. However, the literature regardin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7441385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32759098 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18388 |
_version_ | 1783573286654836736 |
---|---|
author | Camacho, Jhon Zanoletti-Mannello, Manuela Landis-Lewis, Zach Kane-Gill, Sandra L Boyce, Richard D |
author_facet | Camacho, Jhon Zanoletti-Mannello, Manuela Landis-Lewis, Zach Kane-Gill, Sandra L Boyce, Richard D |
author_sort | Camacho, Jhon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The implementation of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) as an intervention to foster clinical practice change is affected by many factors. Key factors include those associated with behavioral change and those associated with technology acceptance. However, the literature regarding these subjects is fragmented and originates from two traditionally separate disciplines: implementation science and technology acceptance. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to propose an integrated framework that bridges the gap between the behavioral change and technology acceptance aspects of the implementation of CDSSs. METHODS: We employed an iterative process to map constructs from four contributing frameworks—the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); the Human, Organization, and Technology-fit framework (HOT-fit); and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)—and the findings of 10 literature reviews, identified through a systematic review of reviews approach. RESULTS: The resulting framework comprises 22 domains: agreement with the decision algorithm; attitudes; behavioral regulation; beliefs about capabilities; beliefs about consequences; contingencies; demographic characteristics; effort expectancy; emotions; environmental context and resources; goals; intentions; intervention characteristics; knowledge; memory, attention, and decision processes; patient–health professional relationship; patient’s preferences; performance expectancy; role and identity; skills, ability, and competence; social influences; and system quality. We demonstrate the use of the framework providing examples from two research projects. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed BEAR (BEhavior and Acceptance fRamework), an integrated framework that bridges the gap between behavioral change and technology acceptance, thereby widening the view established by current models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7441385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74413852020-08-31 A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping Camacho, Jhon Zanoletti-Mannello, Manuela Landis-Lewis, Zach Kane-Gill, Sandra L Boyce, Richard D J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The implementation of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) as an intervention to foster clinical practice change is affected by many factors. Key factors include those associated with behavioral change and those associated with technology acceptance. However, the literature regarding these subjects is fragmented and originates from two traditionally separate disciplines: implementation science and technology acceptance. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to propose an integrated framework that bridges the gap between the behavioral change and technology acceptance aspects of the implementation of CDSSs. METHODS: We employed an iterative process to map constructs from four contributing frameworks—the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); the Human, Organization, and Technology-fit framework (HOT-fit); and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)—and the findings of 10 literature reviews, identified through a systematic review of reviews approach. RESULTS: The resulting framework comprises 22 domains: agreement with the decision algorithm; attitudes; behavioral regulation; beliefs about capabilities; beliefs about consequences; contingencies; demographic characteristics; effort expectancy; emotions; environmental context and resources; goals; intentions; intervention characteristics; knowledge; memory, attention, and decision processes; patient–health professional relationship; patient’s preferences; performance expectancy; role and identity; skills, ability, and competence; social influences; and system quality. We demonstrate the use of the framework providing examples from two research projects. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed BEAR (BEhavior and Acceptance fRamework), an integrated framework that bridges the gap between behavioral change and technology acceptance, thereby widening the view established by current models. JMIR Publications 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7441385/ /pubmed/32759098 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18388 Text en ©Jhon Camacho, Manuela Zanoletti-Mannello, Zach Landis-Lewis, Sandra L Kane-Gill, Richard D Boyce. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 06.08.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Camacho, Jhon Zanoletti-Mannello, Manuela Landis-Lewis, Zach Kane-Gill, Sandra L Boyce, Richard D A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping |
title | A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping |
title_full | A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping |
title_fullStr | A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping |
title_full_unstemmed | A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping |
title_short | A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping |
title_sort | conceptual framework to study the implementation of clinical decision support systems (bear): literature review and concept mapping |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7441385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32759098 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18388 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT camachojhon aconceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping AT zanolettimannellomanuela aconceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping AT landislewiszach aconceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping AT kanegillsandral aconceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping AT boycerichardd aconceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping AT camachojhon conceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping AT zanolettimannellomanuela conceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping AT landislewiszach conceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping AT kanegillsandral conceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping AT boycerichardd conceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping |