Cargando…

A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping

BACKGROUND: The implementation of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) as an intervention to foster clinical practice change is affected by many factors. Key factors include those associated with behavioral change and those associated with technology acceptance. However, the literature regardin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camacho, Jhon, Zanoletti-Mannello, Manuela, Landis-Lewis, Zach, Kane-Gill, Sandra L, Boyce, Richard D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7441385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32759098
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18388
_version_ 1783573286654836736
author Camacho, Jhon
Zanoletti-Mannello, Manuela
Landis-Lewis, Zach
Kane-Gill, Sandra L
Boyce, Richard D
author_facet Camacho, Jhon
Zanoletti-Mannello, Manuela
Landis-Lewis, Zach
Kane-Gill, Sandra L
Boyce, Richard D
author_sort Camacho, Jhon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The implementation of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) as an intervention to foster clinical practice change is affected by many factors. Key factors include those associated with behavioral change and those associated with technology acceptance. However, the literature regarding these subjects is fragmented and originates from two traditionally separate disciplines: implementation science and technology acceptance. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to propose an integrated framework that bridges the gap between the behavioral change and technology acceptance aspects of the implementation of CDSSs. METHODS: We employed an iterative process to map constructs from four contributing frameworks—the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); the Human, Organization, and Technology-fit framework (HOT-fit); and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)—and the findings of 10 literature reviews, identified through a systematic review of reviews approach. RESULTS: The resulting framework comprises 22 domains: agreement with the decision algorithm; attitudes; behavioral regulation; beliefs about capabilities; beliefs about consequences; contingencies; demographic characteristics; effort expectancy; emotions; environmental context and resources; goals; intentions; intervention characteristics; knowledge; memory, attention, and decision processes; patient–health professional relationship; patient’s preferences; performance expectancy; role and identity; skills, ability, and competence; social influences; and system quality. We demonstrate the use of the framework providing examples from two research projects. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed BEAR (BEhavior and Acceptance fRamework), an integrated framework that bridges the gap between behavioral change and technology acceptance, thereby widening the view established by current models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7441385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74413852020-08-31 A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping Camacho, Jhon Zanoletti-Mannello, Manuela Landis-Lewis, Zach Kane-Gill, Sandra L Boyce, Richard D J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The implementation of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) as an intervention to foster clinical practice change is affected by many factors. Key factors include those associated with behavioral change and those associated with technology acceptance. However, the literature regarding these subjects is fragmented and originates from two traditionally separate disciplines: implementation science and technology acceptance. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to propose an integrated framework that bridges the gap between the behavioral change and technology acceptance aspects of the implementation of CDSSs. METHODS: We employed an iterative process to map constructs from four contributing frameworks—the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); the Human, Organization, and Technology-fit framework (HOT-fit); and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)—and the findings of 10 literature reviews, identified through a systematic review of reviews approach. RESULTS: The resulting framework comprises 22 domains: agreement with the decision algorithm; attitudes; behavioral regulation; beliefs about capabilities; beliefs about consequences; contingencies; demographic characteristics; effort expectancy; emotions; environmental context and resources; goals; intentions; intervention characteristics; knowledge; memory, attention, and decision processes; patient–health professional relationship; patient’s preferences; performance expectancy; role and identity; skills, ability, and competence; social influences; and system quality. We demonstrate the use of the framework providing examples from two research projects. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed BEAR (BEhavior and Acceptance fRamework), an integrated framework that bridges the gap between behavioral change and technology acceptance, thereby widening the view established by current models. JMIR Publications 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7441385/ /pubmed/32759098 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18388 Text en ©Jhon Camacho, Manuela Zanoletti-Mannello, Zach Landis-Lewis, Sandra L Kane-Gill, Richard D Boyce. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 06.08.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Camacho, Jhon
Zanoletti-Mannello, Manuela
Landis-Lewis, Zach
Kane-Gill, Sandra L
Boyce, Richard D
A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping
title A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping
title_full A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping
title_fullStr A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping
title_full_unstemmed A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping
title_short A Conceptual Framework to Study the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (BEAR): Literature Review and Concept Mapping
title_sort conceptual framework to study the implementation of clinical decision support systems (bear): literature review and concept mapping
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7441385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32759098
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18388
work_keys_str_mv AT camachojhon aconceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping
AT zanolettimannellomanuela aconceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping
AT landislewiszach aconceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping
AT kanegillsandral aconceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping
AT boycerichardd aconceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping
AT camachojhon conceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping
AT zanolettimannellomanuela conceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping
AT landislewiszach conceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping
AT kanegillsandral conceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping
AT boycerichardd conceptualframeworktostudytheimplementationofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsbearliteraturereviewandconceptmapping