Cargando…
Do changes in STEC diagnostics mislead interpretation of disease surveillance data in Switzerland? Time trends in positivity, 2007 to 2016
BACKGROUND: Laboratory-confirmed cases of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) have been notifiable to the National Notification System for Infectious Diseases in Switzerland since 1999. Since 2015, a large increase in case numbers has been observed. Around the same time, syndromic multiple...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7441602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32820716 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.33.1900584 |
_version_ | 1783573323282644992 |
---|---|
author | Fischer, Fabienne Beatrice Saucy, Apolline Schmutz, Claudia Mäusezahl, Daniel |
author_facet | Fischer, Fabienne Beatrice Saucy, Apolline Schmutz, Claudia Mäusezahl, Daniel |
author_sort | Fischer, Fabienne Beatrice |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laboratory-confirmed cases of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) have been notifiable to the National Notification System for Infectious Diseases in Switzerland since 1999. Since 2015, a large increase in case numbers has been observed. Around the same time, syndromic multiplex PCR started to replace other diagnostic methods in standard laboratory practice for gastrointestinal pathogen testing, suggesting that the increase in notified cases is due to a change in test practices and numbers. AIM: This study examined the impact of changes in diagnostic methods, in particular the introduction of multiplex PCR panels, on routine STEC surveillance data in Switzerland. METHODS: We analysed routine laboratory data from 11 laboratories, which reported 61.9% of all STEC cases from 2007 to 2016 to calculate the positivity, i.e. the rate of the number of positive STEC tests divided by the total number of tests performed. RESULTS: The introduction of multiplex PCR had a strong impact on STEC test frequency and identified cases, with the number of tests performed increasing sevenfold from 2007 to 2016. Still, age- and sex-standardised positivity increased from 0.8% in 2007 to 1.7% in 2016. CONCLUSION: Increasing positivity suggests that the increase in case notifications cannot be attributed to an increase in test numbers alone. Therefore, we cannot exclude a real epidemiological trend for the observed increase. Modernising the notification system to address current gaps in information availability, e.g. diagnostic methods, and improved triangulation of clinical presentation, diagnostic and serotype information are needed to deal with emerging disease and technological advances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7441602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74416022020-08-28 Do changes in STEC diagnostics mislead interpretation of disease surveillance data in Switzerland? Time trends in positivity, 2007 to 2016 Fischer, Fabienne Beatrice Saucy, Apolline Schmutz, Claudia Mäusezahl, Daniel Euro Surveill Research BACKGROUND: Laboratory-confirmed cases of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) have been notifiable to the National Notification System for Infectious Diseases in Switzerland since 1999. Since 2015, a large increase in case numbers has been observed. Around the same time, syndromic multiplex PCR started to replace other diagnostic methods in standard laboratory practice for gastrointestinal pathogen testing, suggesting that the increase in notified cases is due to a change in test practices and numbers. AIM: This study examined the impact of changes in diagnostic methods, in particular the introduction of multiplex PCR panels, on routine STEC surveillance data in Switzerland. METHODS: We analysed routine laboratory data from 11 laboratories, which reported 61.9% of all STEC cases from 2007 to 2016 to calculate the positivity, i.e. the rate of the number of positive STEC tests divided by the total number of tests performed. RESULTS: The introduction of multiplex PCR had a strong impact on STEC test frequency and identified cases, with the number of tests performed increasing sevenfold from 2007 to 2016. Still, age- and sex-standardised positivity increased from 0.8% in 2007 to 1.7% in 2016. CONCLUSION: Increasing positivity suggests that the increase in case notifications cannot be attributed to an increase in test numbers alone. Therefore, we cannot exclude a real epidemiological trend for the observed increase. Modernising the notification system to address current gaps in information availability, e.g. diagnostic methods, and improved triangulation of clinical presentation, diagnostic and serotype information are needed to deal with emerging disease and technological advances. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7441602/ /pubmed/32820716 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.33.1900584 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Fischer, Fabienne Beatrice Saucy, Apolline Schmutz, Claudia Mäusezahl, Daniel Do changes in STEC diagnostics mislead interpretation of disease surveillance data in Switzerland? Time trends in positivity, 2007 to 2016 |
title | Do changes in STEC diagnostics mislead interpretation of disease surveillance data in Switzerland? Time trends in positivity, 2007 to 2016 |
title_full | Do changes in STEC diagnostics mislead interpretation of disease surveillance data in Switzerland? Time trends in positivity, 2007 to 2016 |
title_fullStr | Do changes in STEC diagnostics mislead interpretation of disease surveillance data in Switzerland? Time trends in positivity, 2007 to 2016 |
title_full_unstemmed | Do changes in STEC diagnostics mislead interpretation of disease surveillance data in Switzerland? Time trends in positivity, 2007 to 2016 |
title_short | Do changes in STEC diagnostics mislead interpretation of disease surveillance data in Switzerland? Time trends in positivity, 2007 to 2016 |
title_sort | do changes in stec diagnostics mislead interpretation of disease surveillance data in switzerland? time trends in positivity, 2007 to 2016 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7441602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32820716 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.33.1900584 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fischerfabiennebeatrice dochangesinstecdiagnosticsmisleadinterpretationofdiseasesurveillancedatainswitzerlandtimetrendsinpositivity2007to2016 AT saucyapolline dochangesinstecdiagnosticsmisleadinterpretationofdiseasesurveillancedatainswitzerlandtimetrendsinpositivity2007to2016 AT schmutzclaudia dochangesinstecdiagnosticsmisleadinterpretationofdiseasesurveillancedatainswitzerlandtimetrendsinpositivity2007to2016 AT mausezahldaniel dochangesinstecdiagnosticsmisleadinterpretationofdiseasesurveillancedatainswitzerlandtimetrendsinpositivity2007to2016 |