Cargando…
Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare tracheal intubation performance regarding the time to intubation, glottic view, difficulty, and dental click, by novices using McGrath videolaryngoscope (VL), Pentax Airway Scope (AWS) and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized mani...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7441605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32819444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00435-0 |
_version_ | 1783573323988336640 |
---|---|
author | Yi, In Kyong Kwak, Hyun Jeong Lee, Kyung Cheon Lee, Ji Hyea Min, Sang Kee Kim, Jong Yeop |
author_facet | Yi, In Kyong Kwak, Hyun Jeong Lee, Kyung Cheon Lee, Ji Hyea Min, Sang Kee Kim, Jong Yeop |
author_sort | Yi, In Kyong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare tracheal intubation performance regarding the time to intubation, glottic view, difficulty, and dental click, by novices using McGrath videolaryngoscope (VL), Pentax Airway Scope (AWS) and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin models. METHODS: Thirty-five anesthesia nurses without previous intubation experience were recruited. Participants performed endotracheal intubation in a manikin model at two simulated neck positions (normal and fixed neck via cervical immobilization), using three different devices three times each. Performance parameters included intubation time, success rate of intubation, Cormack Lehane laryngoscope grading, dental click, and subjective difficulty score. RESULTS: Intubation time and success rate during first attempt were not significantly different between the 3 groups in normal airway manikin. In the cervical immobilized manikin, the intubation time was shorter (p = 0.012), and the success rate with the first attempt was significantly higher (p < 0.001) when using McGrath VL and Pentax AWS compared with Macintosh laryngoscope. Both VLs showed less difficulty score (p < 0.001) and more Cormack Lehane grade I (p < 0.001) in both scenarios. The incidence of dental clicks was higher with Macintosh laryngoscope compared with McGrath VL in cervical immobilized airway (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: McGrath VL and Pentax AWS did not show clinically significant decrease in intubation time, however, they achieved higher first attempt success rate, easier intubation and better glottis view compared with Macintosh laryngoscope by novices in a cervical immobilized manikin model. McGrath VL may reduce the risk of dental injury compared with Macintosh laryngoscope in cervical immobilized scenario. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03161730), May 22, 2017 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/hom |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7441605 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74416052020-08-24 Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial Yi, In Kyong Kwak, Hyun Jeong Lee, Kyung Cheon Lee, Ji Hyea Min, Sang Kee Kim, Jong Yeop Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare tracheal intubation performance regarding the time to intubation, glottic view, difficulty, and dental click, by novices using McGrath videolaryngoscope (VL), Pentax Airway Scope (AWS) and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin models. METHODS: Thirty-five anesthesia nurses without previous intubation experience were recruited. Participants performed endotracheal intubation in a manikin model at two simulated neck positions (normal and fixed neck via cervical immobilization), using three different devices three times each. Performance parameters included intubation time, success rate of intubation, Cormack Lehane laryngoscope grading, dental click, and subjective difficulty score. RESULTS: Intubation time and success rate during first attempt were not significantly different between the 3 groups in normal airway manikin. In the cervical immobilized manikin, the intubation time was shorter (p = 0.012), and the success rate with the first attempt was significantly higher (p < 0.001) when using McGrath VL and Pentax AWS compared with Macintosh laryngoscope. Both VLs showed less difficulty score (p < 0.001) and more Cormack Lehane grade I (p < 0.001) in both scenarios. The incidence of dental clicks was higher with Macintosh laryngoscope compared with McGrath VL in cervical immobilized airway (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: McGrath VL and Pentax AWS did not show clinically significant decrease in intubation time, however, they achieved higher first attempt success rate, easier intubation and better glottis view compared with Macintosh laryngoscope by novices in a cervical immobilized manikin model. McGrath VL may reduce the risk of dental injury compared with Macintosh laryngoscope in cervical immobilized scenario. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03161730), May 22, 2017 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/hom BioMed Central 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7441605/ /pubmed/32819444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00435-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Yi, In Kyong Kwak, Hyun Jeong Lee, Kyung Cheon Lee, Ji Hyea Min, Sang Kee Kim, Jong Yeop Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial |
title | Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial |
title_full | Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial |
title_short | Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial |
title_sort | comparison of mcgrath, pentax, and macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7441605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32819444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00435-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yiinkyong comparisonofmcgrathpentaxandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinnormalandcervicalimmobilizedmanikinbynovicesarandomizedcrossovertrial AT kwakhyunjeong comparisonofmcgrathpentaxandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinnormalandcervicalimmobilizedmanikinbynovicesarandomizedcrossovertrial AT leekyungcheon comparisonofmcgrathpentaxandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinnormalandcervicalimmobilizedmanikinbynovicesarandomizedcrossovertrial AT leejihyea comparisonofmcgrathpentaxandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinnormalandcervicalimmobilizedmanikinbynovicesarandomizedcrossovertrial AT minsangkee comparisonofmcgrathpentaxandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinnormalandcervicalimmobilizedmanikinbynovicesarandomizedcrossovertrial AT kimjongyeop comparisonofmcgrathpentaxandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinnormalandcervicalimmobilizedmanikinbynovicesarandomizedcrossovertrial |