Cargando…

Medical Library Association Diversity and Inclusion Task Force 2019 Survey Report

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this survey by the Medical Library Association (MLA) Diversity and Inclusion Task Force was to have a better understanding of the demographics of the association as well as ascertain how the membership feels about MLA's diversity efforts. METHODS: A survey was created wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pionke, JJ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7441896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843882
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.948
_version_ 1783573366508093440
author Pionke, JJ
author_facet Pionke, JJ
author_sort Pionke, JJ
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The goal of this survey by the Medical Library Association (MLA) Diversity and Inclusion Task Force was to have a better understanding of the demographics of the association as well as ascertain how the membership feels about MLA's diversity efforts. METHODS: A survey was created with the input of both task force members as well as MLA professional staff. It was administered via SurveyMonkey and distributed through email over the course of two weeks in October 2019. RESULTS: The demographics portion of the survey—beyond asking the usual questions about race or ethnicity (72% white), age (65% between 30 and 59), and so on—also asked questions that were more specific to diversity including, but not limited to, gender representation (79% female), sexuality (67% heterosexual), military service (97% have never served), ability (26% have anxiety sometimes or in certain situations), and college financial aid (49% used federal student loans). Diversity-specific questions asked about diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the association: 59% strongly agreed or agreed that MLA has a strong commitment to DEI; 54% felt that the amount of time that association was spending on DEI issues was just about right; and 56% were very satisfied or satisfied with the DEI environment at MLA. Members also reported feeling like they belonged in MLA (59%), they were treated with respect (77%), and they were valued by MLA (59%) CONCLUSION: The survey paints a picture of the membership that is much deeper than any previously conducted membership survey. It shows the diversity of membership, especially in terms of ability and religion. Generally, the membership feels that MLA is right on target with the level of focus that MLA is giving issues of diversity. This survey reinforces the diversity work that has been done and supports diversity work in MLA in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7441896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74418962020-08-24 Medical Library Association Diversity and Inclusion Task Force 2019 Survey Report Pionke, JJ J Med Libr Assoc Association Record OBJECTIVE: The goal of this survey by the Medical Library Association (MLA) Diversity and Inclusion Task Force was to have a better understanding of the demographics of the association as well as ascertain how the membership feels about MLA's diversity efforts. METHODS: A survey was created with the input of both task force members as well as MLA professional staff. It was administered via SurveyMonkey and distributed through email over the course of two weeks in October 2019. RESULTS: The demographics portion of the survey—beyond asking the usual questions about race or ethnicity (72% white), age (65% between 30 and 59), and so on—also asked questions that were more specific to diversity including, but not limited to, gender representation (79% female), sexuality (67% heterosexual), military service (97% have never served), ability (26% have anxiety sometimes or in certain situations), and college financial aid (49% used federal student loans). Diversity-specific questions asked about diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the association: 59% strongly agreed or agreed that MLA has a strong commitment to DEI; 54% felt that the amount of time that association was spending on DEI issues was just about right; and 56% were very satisfied or satisfied with the DEI environment at MLA. Members also reported feeling like they belonged in MLA (59%), they were treated with respect (77%), and they were valued by MLA (59%) CONCLUSION: The survey paints a picture of the membership that is much deeper than any previously conducted membership survey. It shows the diversity of membership, especially in terms of ability and religion. Generally, the membership feels that MLA is right on target with the level of focus that MLA is giving issues of diversity. This survey reinforces the diversity work that has been done and supports diversity work in MLA in the future. University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2020-07-01 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7441896/ /pubmed/32843882 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.948 Text en Copyright © 2020 JJ Pionke This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Association Record
Pionke, JJ
Medical Library Association Diversity and Inclusion Task Force 2019 Survey Report
title Medical Library Association Diversity and Inclusion Task Force 2019 Survey Report
title_full Medical Library Association Diversity and Inclusion Task Force 2019 Survey Report
title_fullStr Medical Library Association Diversity and Inclusion Task Force 2019 Survey Report
title_full_unstemmed Medical Library Association Diversity and Inclusion Task Force 2019 Survey Report
title_short Medical Library Association Diversity and Inclusion Task Force 2019 Survey Report
title_sort medical library association diversity and inclusion task force 2019 survey report
topic Association Record
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7441896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843882
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.948
work_keys_str_mv AT pionkejj medicallibraryassociationdiversityandinclusiontaskforce2019surveyreport