Cargando…

Emphasizing the Diagnostic Value of Digital Tomosynthesis in Detecting Hip Fractures

Our institution recently implemented the use of digital tomosynthesis (DTS) to workup emergency room patients with suspected hip fractures after initial negative or indeterminate radiographs. Our purpose is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of DTS for hip fracture detection. We performed a retrosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozimok, Cory, Koff, David, Parasu, Naveen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Grapho Publications, LLC 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32879901
http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2020.00031
_version_ 1783573411361980416
author Ozimok, Cory
Koff, David
Parasu, Naveen
author_facet Ozimok, Cory
Koff, David
Parasu, Naveen
author_sort Ozimok, Cory
collection PubMed
description Our institution recently implemented the use of digital tomosynthesis (DTS) to workup emergency room patients with suspected hip fractures after initial negative or indeterminate radiographs. Our purpose is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of DTS for hip fracture detection. We performed a retrospective review of all DTS studies over a 17-month period (July 2017 to November 2018). The results of the radiographs and DTS were recorded as either positive or negative for fracture based on the radiology report. Our reference standard for a fracture was either confirmation on subsequent CT or MRI from the same visit or documentation of clinical findings supportive of a fracture in the patient’s electronic medical record. For patients with negative DTS who did not undergo subsequent cross-sectional imaging, a missed fracture was excluded if they did not return within 30 days with a confirmed fracture. Among 91 patients, there were 34 confirmed fractures—sites including, 7 femoral necks, 10 pubic rami, and 7 greater trochanters. DTS was positive for fracture in 29 patients; 28 of these fractures were true positives, 6 confirmed on cross-sectional imaging, and 22 confirmed clinically. One false positive was observed in a patient with no clinical evidence of a fracture. Six fractures were not detected by tomosynthesis but confirmed on CT/MRI. The sensitivity and specificity of DTS are 82% and 98%, respectively, compared to that of radiographs alone at 47% and 96%, respectively. DTS is a promising adjunct to radiographs for hip fracture detection in an emergency department.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7442093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Grapho Publications, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74420932020-09-01 Emphasizing the Diagnostic Value of Digital Tomosynthesis in Detecting Hip Fractures Ozimok, Cory Koff, David Parasu, Naveen Tomography Research Article Our institution recently implemented the use of digital tomosynthesis (DTS) to workup emergency room patients with suspected hip fractures after initial negative or indeterminate radiographs. Our purpose is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of DTS for hip fracture detection. We performed a retrospective review of all DTS studies over a 17-month period (July 2017 to November 2018). The results of the radiographs and DTS were recorded as either positive or negative for fracture based on the radiology report. Our reference standard for a fracture was either confirmation on subsequent CT or MRI from the same visit or documentation of clinical findings supportive of a fracture in the patient’s electronic medical record. For patients with negative DTS who did not undergo subsequent cross-sectional imaging, a missed fracture was excluded if they did not return within 30 days with a confirmed fracture. Among 91 patients, there were 34 confirmed fractures—sites including, 7 femoral necks, 10 pubic rami, and 7 greater trochanters. DTS was positive for fracture in 29 patients; 28 of these fractures were true positives, 6 confirmed on cross-sectional imaging, and 22 confirmed clinically. One false positive was observed in a patient with no clinical evidence of a fracture. Six fractures were not detected by tomosynthesis but confirmed on CT/MRI. The sensitivity and specificity of DTS are 82% and 98%, respectively, compared to that of radiographs alone at 47% and 96%, respectively. DTS is a promising adjunct to radiographs for hip fracture detection in an emergency department. Grapho Publications, LLC 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7442093/ /pubmed/32879901 http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2020.00031 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Grapho Publications, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Ozimok, Cory
Koff, David
Parasu, Naveen
Emphasizing the Diagnostic Value of Digital Tomosynthesis in Detecting Hip Fractures
title Emphasizing the Diagnostic Value of Digital Tomosynthesis in Detecting Hip Fractures
title_full Emphasizing the Diagnostic Value of Digital Tomosynthesis in Detecting Hip Fractures
title_fullStr Emphasizing the Diagnostic Value of Digital Tomosynthesis in Detecting Hip Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Emphasizing the Diagnostic Value of Digital Tomosynthesis in Detecting Hip Fractures
title_short Emphasizing the Diagnostic Value of Digital Tomosynthesis in Detecting Hip Fractures
title_sort emphasizing the diagnostic value of digital tomosynthesis in detecting hip fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32879901
http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2020.00031
work_keys_str_mv AT ozimokcory emphasizingthediagnosticvalueofdigitaltomosynthesisindetectinghipfractures
AT koffdavid emphasizingthediagnosticvalueofdigitaltomosynthesisindetectinghipfractures
AT parasunaveen emphasizingthediagnosticvalueofdigitaltomosynthesisindetectinghipfractures