Cargando…

Association between electronic cigarette use and metabolic syndrome in the Korean general population: A nationwide population-based study

OBJECTIVES: Although smoking is known to have a negative impact in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS), only a few studies have examined the association between electronic cigarette (e-cig) use and MetS. METHODS: Among 22,948 participants in the 6th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examinatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Taeyun, Choi, Hyunji, Kang, Jihun, Kim, Jehun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237983
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Although smoking is known to have a negative impact in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS), only a few studies have examined the association between electronic cigarette (e-cig) use and MetS. METHODS: Among 22,948 participants in the 6th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 14,738 (13,459 [91.3%] never, 954 [6.5%] ever, and 325 [2.2%] current e-cig users) were selected. The relationship between e-cig exposure and MetS (based on the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel [NCEP-ATP] III criteria) was evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. An unweighted analysis was performed to evaluate this association without a sampling weight. A subgroup analysis was performed among active smokers to compare dual users with never e-cig users. RESULTS: Among current e-cig users, 85.0% were dual users, 12.7% were former cigarette users, and 2.2% were only e-cig users. After adjustment for covariates, abdominal obesity and hypertriglyceridemia were significantly associated with current e-cig exposure (odds ratio [OR]: 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41–2.50 and OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.00–1.74 respectively [compared with the never e-cig users group]). Compared with never e-cig users, current e-cig users showed an OR of 1.27 (95% CI: 0.96–1.70, P(trend) = 0.01) for MetS. In the unweighted analysis, the OR for MetS in current e-cig users was 1.40 (95% CI: 1.08–1.81, P(trend) <0.01). Compared with never e-cig users, dual users showed a higher OR for abdominal obesity (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.25–2.34, P(trend) <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Current e-cig exposure was associated with an increased risk of MetS. Dual use of e-cigs and cigarettes was associated with abdominal obesity. Further longitudinal studies and better assessment of e-cig use and type are needed to clarify this relationship.