Cargando…
Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies
Cheater viruses, also known as defective interfering viruses, cannot replicate on their own yet replicate faster than the wild type upon coinfection. While there is growing interest in using cheaters as antiviral therapeutics, the mechanisms underlying cheating have been rarely explored. During expe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb7990 |
_version_ | 1783573463902978048 |
---|---|
author | Meir, Moran Harel, Noam Miller, Danielle Gelbart, Maoz Eldar, Avigdor Gophna, Uri Stern, Adi |
author_facet | Meir, Moran Harel, Noam Miller, Danielle Gelbart, Maoz Eldar, Avigdor Gophna, Uri Stern, Adi |
author_sort | Meir, Moran |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cheater viruses, also known as defective interfering viruses, cannot replicate on their own yet replicate faster than the wild type upon coinfection. While there is growing interest in using cheaters as antiviral therapeutics, the mechanisms underlying cheating have been rarely explored. During experimental evolution of MS2 phage, we observed the parallel emergence of two independent cheater mutants. The first, a point deletion mutant, lacked polymerase activity but was advantageous in viral packaging. The second synonymous mutant cheater displayed a completely different cheating mechanism, involving an altered RNA structure. Continued evolution revealed the demise of the deletion cheater and rise of the synonymous cheater. A mathematical model inferred that while a single cheater is expected to reach an equilibrium with the wild type, cheater demise arises from antagonistic interactions between coinfecting cheaters. These findings highlight layers of parasitism: viruses parasitizing cells, cheaters parasitizing intact viruses, and cheaters may parasitize other cheaters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7442481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Association for the Advancement of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74424812020-09-16 Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies Meir, Moran Harel, Noam Miller, Danielle Gelbart, Maoz Eldar, Avigdor Gophna, Uri Stern, Adi Sci Adv Research Articles Cheater viruses, also known as defective interfering viruses, cannot replicate on their own yet replicate faster than the wild type upon coinfection. While there is growing interest in using cheaters as antiviral therapeutics, the mechanisms underlying cheating have been rarely explored. During experimental evolution of MS2 phage, we observed the parallel emergence of two independent cheater mutants. The first, a point deletion mutant, lacked polymerase activity but was advantageous in viral packaging. The second synonymous mutant cheater displayed a completely different cheating mechanism, involving an altered RNA structure. Continued evolution revealed the demise of the deletion cheater and rise of the synonymous cheater. A mathematical model inferred that while a single cheater is expected to reach an equilibrium with the wild type, cheater demise arises from antagonistic interactions between coinfecting cheaters. These findings highlight layers of parasitism: viruses parasitizing cells, cheaters parasitizing intact viruses, and cheaters may parasitize other cheaters. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7442481/ /pubmed/32937370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb7990 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Meir, Moran Harel, Noam Miller, Danielle Gelbart, Maoz Eldar, Avigdor Gophna, Uri Stern, Adi Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies |
title | Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies |
title_full | Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies |
title_fullStr | Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies |
title_short | Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies |
title_sort | competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb7990 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meirmoran competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies AT harelnoam competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies AT millerdanielle competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies AT gelbartmaoz competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies AT eldaravigdor competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies AT gophnauri competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies AT sternadi competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies |