Cargando…

Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies

Cheater viruses, also known as defective interfering viruses, cannot replicate on their own yet replicate faster than the wild type upon coinfection. While there is growing interest in using cheaters as antiviral therapeutics, the mechanisms underlying cheating have been rarely explored. During expe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meir, Moran, Harel, Noam, Miller, Danielle, Gelbart, Maoz, Eldar, Avigdor, Gophna, Uri, Stern, Adi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for the Advancement of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb7990
_version_ 1783573463902978048
author Meir, Moran
Harel, Noam
Miller, Danielle
Gelbart, Maoz
Eldar, Avigdor
Gophna, Uri
Stern, Adi
author_facet Meir, Moran
Harel, Noam
Miller, Danielle
Gelbart, Maoz
Eldar, Avigdor
Gophna, Uri
Stern, Adi
author_sort Meir, Moran
collection PubMed
description Cheater viruses, also known as defective interfering viruses, cannot replicate on their own yet replicate faster than the wild type upon coinfection. While there is growing interest in using cheaters as antiviral therapeutics, the mechanisms underlying cheating have been rarely explored. During experimental evolution of MS2 phage, we observed the parallel emergence of two independent cheater mutants. The first, a point deletion mutant, lacked polymerase activity but was advantageous in viral packaging. The second synonymous mutant cheater displayed a completely different cheating mechanism, involving an altered RNA structure. Continued evolution revealed the demise of the deletion cheater and rise of the synonymous cheater. A mathematical model inferred that while a single cheater is expected to reach an equilibrium with the wild type, cheater demise arises from antagonistic interactions between coinfecting cheaters. These findings highlight layers of parasitism: viruses parasitizing cells, cheaters parasitizing intact viruses, and cheaters may parasitize other cheaters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7442481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74424812020-09-16 Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies Meir, Moran Harel, Noam Miller, Danielle Gelbart, Maoz Eldar, Avigdor Gophna, Uri Stern, Adi Sci Adv Research Articles Cheater viruses, also known as defective interfering viruses, cannot replicate on their own yet replicate faster than the wild type upon coinfection. While there is growing interest in using cheaters as antiviral therapeutics, the mechanisms underlying cheating have been rarely explored. During experimental evolution of MS2 phage, we observed the parallel emergence of two independent cheater mutants. The first, a point deletion mutant, lacked polymerase activity but was advantageous in viral packaging. The second synonymous mutant cheater displayed a completely different cheating mechanism, involving an altered RNA structure. Continued evolution revealed the demise of the deletion cheater and rise of the synonymous cheater. A mathematical model inferred that while a single cheater is expected to reach an equilibrium with the wild type, cheater demise arises from antagonistic interactions between coinfecting cheaters. These findings highlight layers of parasitism: viruses parasitizing cells, cheaters parasitizing intact viruses, and cheaters may parasitize other cheaters. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7442481/ /pubmed/32937370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb7990 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Meir, Moran
Harel, Noam
Miller, Danielle
Gelbart, Maoz
Eldar, Avigdor
Gophna, Uri
Stern, Adi
Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies
title Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies
title_full Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies
title_fullStr Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies
title_full_unstemmed Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies
title_short Competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies
title_sort competition between social cheater viruses is driven by mechanistically different cheating strategies
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb7990
work_keys_str_mv AT meirmoran competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies
AT harelnoam competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies
AT millerdanielle competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies
AT gelbartmaoz competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies
AT eldaravigdor competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies
AT gophnauri competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies
AT sternadi competitionbetweensocialcheatervirusesisdrivenbymechanisticallydifferentcheatingstrategies