Cargando…
Ethics in Surgical Innovations from the Patient Perspective
Objective : Surgical innovation (SI) can place patients at risk. We sought to explore what clinical information is readily available to patients who have been offered innovative surgical procedures, using two examples drawn from our recent experience: one a surgical technique, and the other a prosth...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32823312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701994 |
_version_ | 1783573472919683072 |
---|---|
author | Eyers, Tony Krastev, Yordanka |
author_facet | Eyers, Tony Krastev, Yordanka |
author_sort | Eyers, Tony |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective : Surgical innovation (SI) can place patients at risk. We sought to explore what clinical information is readily available to patients who have been offered innovative surgical procedures, using two examples drawn from our recent experience: one a surgical technique, and the other a prosthetic material. We wanted to determine from our review the extent to which information available on the Internet might augment the medical literature and help satisfy the ethical requirements for patients to be adequately informed before they proceed with innovative surgery. Methods : A scoping review of the medical literature was performed to look for studies addressing the review aims; targeted searches on Google, YouTube, and patient websites were carried out to find readily available patient information on two chosen innovative surgical procedures. We conducted a content analysis of the selected references to determine the availability, relevance, and the utility of the published information to a layperson. Results : Medical database searches identified 614 records, 91 were screened and only six were relevant. The Internet searches returned thousands of results; however, we limited our screening to the first five pages of results for those sources. From both types of searches, 348 references were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria and 51 were included in the analysis. The findings are presented in four themes: safety and feasibility of the technique, availability and accessibility to a layperson, relevance and utility to a layperson, and commercial information. Conclusion : The review has shown that lay people seeking to find out more about the two innovations would get very little useful information from Google, YouTube, or patient websites. Practitioners offering SI should provide sufficient information to allow their patients to make an autonomous decision about whether to proceed. For major SI, we encourage innovators to develop a plain language statement that would be made available on the Internet to the mutual advantage of both innovators and patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7442521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74425212020-08-24 Ethics in Surgical Innovations from the Patient Perspective Eyers, Tony Krastev, Yordanka Yearb Med Inform Objective : Surgical innovation (SI) can place patients at risk. We sought to explore what clinical information is readily available to patients who have been offered innovative surgical procedures, using two examples drawn from our recent experience: one a surgical technique, and the other a prosthetic material. We wanted to determine from our review the extent to which information available on the Internet might augment the medical literature and help satisfy the ethical requirements for patients to be adequately informed before they proceed with innovative surgery. Methods : A scoping review of the medical literature was performed to look for studies addressing the review aims; targeted searches on Google, YouTube, and patient websites were carried out to find readily available patient information on two chosen innovative surgical procedures. We conducted a content analysis of the selected references to determine the availability, relevance, and the utility of the published information to a layperson. Results : Medical database searches identified 614 records, 91 were screened and only six were relevant. The Internet searches returned thousands of results; however, we limited our screening to the first five pages of results for those sources. From both types of searches, 348 references were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria and 51 were included in the analysis. The findings are presented in four themes: safety and feasibility of the technique, availability and accessibility to a layperson, relevance and utility to a layperson, and commercial information. Conclusion : The review has shown that lay people seeking to find out more about the two innovations would get very little useful information from Google, YouTube, or patient websites. Practitioners offering SI should provide sufficient information to allow their patients to make an autonomous decision about whether to proceed. For major SI, we encourage innovators to develop a plain language statement that would be made available on the Internet to the mutual advantage of both innovators and patients. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-08 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7442521/ /pubmed/32823312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701994 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Eyers, Tony Krastev, Yordanka Ethics in Surgical Innovations from the Patient Perspective |
title | Ethics in Surgical Innovations from the Patient Perspective |
title_full | Ethics in Surgical Innovations from the Patient Perspective |
title_fullStr | Ethics in Surgical Innovations from the Patient Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethics in Surgical Innovations from the Patient Perspective |
title_short | Ethics in Surgical Innovations from the Patient Perspective |
title_sort | ethics in surgical innovations from the patient perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32823312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701994 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eyerstony ethicsinsurgicalinnovationsfromthepatientperspective AT krastevyordanka ethicsinsurgicalinnovationsfromthepatientperspective |