Cargando…

Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas

BACKGROUND: After more than six months into the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, as of August 10, 2020, over 734,664 people had died worldwide. The current study aims to evaluate how mitigating interventions affected the epidemic process in the 30 largest metropolitan areas in the US and whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Yu, Xinhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100160
_version_ 1783573480277540864
author Yu, Xinhua
author_facet Yu, Xinhua
author_sort Yu, Xinhua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: After more than six months into the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, as of August 10, 2020, over 734,664 people had died worldwide. The current study aims to evaluate how mitigating interventions affected the epidemic process in the 30 largest metropolitan areas in the US and whether temperature played a role in the epidemic process. METHODS: Publicly available data for the time series of COVID-19 cases and deaths and weather were analyzed at the metropolitan level. The time-varying reproductive numbers (R(t)) based on retrospective moving average were used to explore the trends. Student t-tests were used to compare temperature and peak R(t) cross-sectionally. RESULTS: We found that virus transmissibility, measured by instantaneous reproduction number (R(t)), had declined since the end of March for all areas and almost all of them reached a R(t) of 1 or below after April 15, 2020. The timing of the main decline was concurrent with the implementation of mitigating interventions. However, the R(t)s remained around 1 for most areas since then and there were some small and short rebounds in some areas, suggesting a persistent epidemic in those areas when interventions were relaxed. Cities with warm temperature also tended to have a lower peak R(t) than that of cities with cold temperature. However, they were not statistically significant and large geographic variations existed. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive interventions might have mitigated the current pandemic of COVID-19, while temperature might have weak effects on the virus transmission. We may need to prepare for a possible return of the coronavirus outbreak.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7442557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74425572020-08-24 Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas Yu, Xinhua One Health Research Paper BACKGROUND: After more than six months into the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, as of August 10, 2020, over 734,664 people had died worldwide. The current study aims to evaluate how mitigating interventions affected the epidemic process in the 30 largest metropolitan areas in the US and whether temperature played a role in the epidemic process. METHODS: Publicly available data for the time series of COVID-19 cases and deaths and weather were analyzed at the metropolitan level. The time-varying reproductive numbers (R(t)) based on retrospective moving average were used to explore the trends. Student t-tests were used to compare temperature and peak R(t) cross-sectionally. RESULTS: We found that virus transmissibility, measured by instantaneous reproduction number (R(t)), had declined since the end of March for all areas and almost all of them reached a R(t) of 1 or below after April 15, 2020. The timing of the main decline was concurrent with the implementation of mitigating interventions. However, the R(t)s remained around 1 for most areas since then and there were some small and short rebounds in some areas, suggesting a persistent epidemic in those areas when interventions were relaxed. Cities with warm temperature also tended to have a lower peak R(t) than that of cities with cold temperature. However, they were not statistically significant and large geographic variations existed. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive interventions might have mitigated the current pandemic of COVID-19, while temperature might have weak effects on the virus transmission. We may need to prepare for a possible return of the coronavirus outbreak. Elsevier 2020-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7442557/ /pubmed/32864409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100160 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Yu, Xinhua
Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas
title Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas
title_full Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas
title_fullStr Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas
title_full_unstemmed Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas
title_short Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas
title_sort impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the covid-19 pandemic among 30 us metropolitan areas
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100160
work_keys_str_mv AT yuxinhua impactofmitigatinginterventionsandtemperatureontheinstantaneousreproductionnumberinthecovid19pandemicamong30usmetropolitanareas