Cargando…

In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations

Most anticancer drugs provoke apoptotic signaling by damaging DNA or other means. Genotoxic therapies may enhance a patient’s risk of developing “therapy-related cancers” due to the accumulation of oncogenic mutations that may occur in noncancerous cells. Mutations can also form upon apoptotic signa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miles, Mark A., Hawkins, Christine J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32826875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-02879-y
_version_ 1783573491742670848
author Miles, Mark A.
Hawkins, Christine J.
author_facet Miles, Mark A.
Hawkins, Christine J.
author_sort Miles, Mark A.
collection PubMed
description Most anticancer drugs provoke apoptotic signaling by damaging DNA or other means. Genotoxic therapies may enhance a patient’s risk of developing “therapy-related cancers” due to the accumulation of oncogenic mutations that may occur in noncancerous cells. Mutations can also form upon apoptotic signaling due to sublethal caspase activity, implying that apoptosis activating drugs may also be oncogenic. Necroptosis is a different way of killing cancer cells: this version of caspase-independent cell death is characterized by receptor-interacting protein kinase-3 (RIPK3) and mixed lineage kinase-like domain protein (MLKL) activation, leading to cell membrane rupture and controlled cell lysis. The mutagenic potential of sublethal necroptotic signaling has not yet been directly investigated. Smac mimetics drugs, which activate apoptotic or necroptotic cell death, do not induce mutations but the mechanistic basis for this lack of mutagenic activity has not been determined. In this study, we compared the mutagenic potential of these two cell death pathways by engineering cells to activate either apoptotic or necroptotic signaling by exposing them to Smac mimetics with or without TNFα, and/or enforcing or preventing expression of apoptotic or necroptotic regulators. We discovered that sublethal concentrations of Smac mimetics in contexts that activated apoptotic signaling provoked DNA damage and mutations in surviving cells. Mutagenesis was dependent on executioner caspase activation of the nuclease CAD. In contrast, RIPK3- and MLKL-dependent necroptotic signaling following Smac mimetic treatment was not mutagenic. Likewise, DNA damage was not provoked in cells expressing a lethal constitutively active MLKL mutant. These data reveal that cells surviving sublethal necroptotic signaling do not sustain genomic damage and provide hope for a reduced risk of therapy-related malignancies in patients treated with necroptosis-inducing drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7442655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74426552020-09-02 In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations Miles, Mark A. Hawkins, Christine J. Cell Death Dis Article Most anticancer drugs provoke apoptotic signaling by damaging DNA or other means. Genotoxic therapies may enhance a patient’s risk of developing “therapy-related cancers” due to the accumulation of oncogenic mutations that may occur in noncancerous cells. Mutations can also form upon apoptotic signaling due to sublethal caspase activity, implying that apoptosis activating drugs may also be oncogenic. Necroptosis is a different way of killing cancer cells: this version of caspase-independent cell death is characterized by receptor-interacting protein kinase-3 (RIPK3) and mixed lineage kinase-like domain protein (MLKL) activation, leading to cell membrane rupture and controlled cell lysis. The mutagenic potential of sublethal necroptotic signaling has not yet been directly investigated. Smac mimetics drugs, which activate apoptotic or necroptotic cell death, do not induce mutations but the mechanistic basis for this lack of mutagenic activity has not been determined. In this study, we compared the mutagenic potential of these two cell death pathways by engineering cells to activate either apoptotic or necroptotic signaling by exposing them to Smac mimetics with or without TNFα, and/or enforcing or preventing expression of apoptotic or necroptotic regulators. We discovered that sublethal concentrations of Smac mimetics in contexts that activated apoptotic signaling provoked DNA damage and mutations in surviving cells. Mutagenesis was dependent on executioner caspase activation of the nuclease CAD. In contrast, RIPK3- and MLKL-dependent necroptotic signaling following Smac mimetic treatment was not mutagenic. Likewise, DNA damage was not provoked in cells expressing a lethal constitutively active MLKL mutant. These data reveal that cells surviving sublethal necroptotic signaling do not sustain genomic damage and provide hope for a reduced risk of therapy-related malignancies in patients treated with necroptosis-inducing drugs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7442655/ /pubmed/32826875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-02879-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Miles, Mark A.
Hawkins, Christine J.
In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations
title In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations
title_full In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations
title_fullStr In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations
title_full_unstemmed In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations
title_short In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations
title_sort in vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke dna damage or hprt mutations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32826875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-02879-y
work_keys_str_mv AT milesmarka invitroanalysisrevealsnecroptoticsignalingdoesnotprovokednadamageorhprtmutations
AT hawkinschristinej invitroanalysisrevealsnecroptoticsignalingdoesnotprovokednadamageorhprtmutations