Cargando…
In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations
Most anticancer drugs provoke apoptotic signaling by damaging DNA or other means. Genotoxic therapies may enhance a patient’s risk of developing “therapy-related cancers” due to the accumulation of oncogenic mutations that may occur in noncancerous cells. Mutations can also form upon apoptotic signa...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32826875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-02879-y |
_version_ | 1783573491742670848 |
---|---|
author | Miles, Mark A. Hawkins, Christine J. |
author_facet | Miles, Mark A. Hawkins, Christine J. |
author_sort | Miles, Mark A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most anticancer drugs provoke apoptotic signaling by damaging DNA or other means. Genotoxic therapies may enhance a patient’s risk of developing “therapy-related cancers” due to the accumulation of oncogenic mutations that may occur in noncancerous cells. Mutations can also form upon apoptotic signaling due to sublethal caspase activity, implying that apoptosis activating drugs may also be oncogenic. Necroptosis is a different way of killing cancer cells: this version of caspase-independent cell death is characterized by receptor-interacting protein kinase-3 (RIPK3) and mixed lineage kinase-like domain protein (MLKL) activation, leading to cell membrane rupture and controlled cell lysis. The mutagenic potential of sublethal necroptotic signaling has not yet been directly investigated. Smac mimetics drugs, which activate apoptotic or necroptotic cell death, do not induce mutations but the mechanistic basis for this lack of mutagenic activity has not been determined. In this study, we compared the mutagenic potential of these two cell death pathways by engineering cells to activate either apoptotic or necroptotic signaling by exposing them to Smac mimetics with or without TNFα, and/or enforcing or preventing expression of apoptotic or necroptotic regulators. We discovered that sublethal concentrations of Smac mimetics in contexts that activated apoptotic signaling provoked DNA damage and mutations in surviving cells. Mutagenesis was dependent on executioner caspase activation of the nuclease CAD. In contrast, RIPK3- and MLKL-dependent necroptotic signaling following Smac mimetic treatment was not mutagenic. Likewise, DNA damage was not provoked in cells expressing a lethal constitutively active MLKL mutant. These data reveal that cells surviving sublethal necroptotic signaling do not sustain genomic damage and provide hope for a reduced risk of therapy-related malignancies in patients treated with necroptosis-inducing drugs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7442655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74426552020-09-02 In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations Miles, Mark A. Hawkins, Christine J. Cell Death Dis Article Most anticancer drugs provoke apoptotic signaling by damaging DNA or other means. Genotoxic therapies may enhance a patient’s risk of developing “therapy-related cancers” due to the accumulation of oncogenic mutations that may occur in noncancerous cells. Mutations can also form upon apoptotic signaling due to sublethal caspase activity, implying that apoptosis activating drugs may also be oncogenic. Necroptosis is a different way of killing cancer cells: this version of caspase-independent cell death is characterized by receptor-interacting protein kinase-3 (RIPK3) and mixed lineage kinase-like domain protein (MLKL) activation, leading to cell membrane rupture and controlled cell lysis. The mutagenic potential of sublethal necroptotic signaling has not yet been directly investigated. Smac mimetics drugs, which activate apoptotic or necroptotic cell death, do not induce mutations but the mechanistic basis for this lack of mutagenic activity has not been determined. In this study, we compared the mutagenic potential of these two cell death pathways by engineering cells to activate either apoptotic or necroptotic signaling by exposing them to Smac mimetics with or without TNFα, and/or enforcing or preventing expression of apoptotic or necroptotic regulators. We discovered that sublethal concentrations of Smac mimetics in contexts that activated apoptotic signaling provoked DNA damage and mutations in surviving cells. Mutagenesis was dependent on executioner caspase activation of the nuclease CAD. In contrast, RIPK3- and MLKL-dependent necroptotic signaling following Smac mimetic treatment was not mutagenic. Likewise, DNA damage was not provoked in cells expressing a lethal constitutively active MLKL mutant. These data reveal that cells surviving sublethal necroptotic signaling do not sustain genomic damage and provide hope for a reduced risk of therapy-related malignancies in patients treated with necroptosis-inducing drugs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7442655/ /pubmed/32826875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-02879-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Miles, Mark A. Hawkins, Christine J. In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations |
title | In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations |
title_full | In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations |
title_fullStr | In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations |
title_short | In vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke DNA damage or HPRT mutations |
title_sort | in vitro analysis reveals necroptotic signaling does not provoke dna damage or hprt mutations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32826875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-02879-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milesmarka invitroanalysisrevealsnecroptoticsignalingdoesnotprovokednadamageorhprtmutations AT hawkinschristinej invitroanalysisrevealsnecroptoticsignalingdoesnotprovokednadamageorhprtmutations |