Cargando…

Suitability of virtual plaster models superimposed with the lateral cephalogram for guided paramedian orthodontic mini-implant placement with regard to the bone support

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to evaluate the precision of guided orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) placement planned on virtual superimposition of plaster models and lateral cephalograms with regard to the bone support and, second, to investigate the effects of silicone guide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian, Brandt, Maximilian, Kniha, Kristian, Bock, Anna, Prescher, Andreas, Hölzle, Frank, Modabber, Ali, Danesh, Golamreza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-020-00238-2
_version_ 1783573500705898496
author Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian
Brandt, Maximilian
Kniha, Kristian
Bock, Anna
Prescher, Andreas
Hölzle, Frank
Modabber, Ali
Danesh, Golamreza
author_facet Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian
Brandt, Maximilian
Kniha, Kristian
Bock, Anna
Prescher, Andreas
Hölzle, Frank
Modabber, Ali
Danesh, Golamreza
author_sort Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to evaluate the precision of guided orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) placement planned on virtual superimposition of plaster models and lateral cephalograms with regard to the bone support and, second, to investigate the effects of silicone guide extension. METHODS: A total of 40 OMIs were placed in the paramedian area of the anterior palates of 20 cadaver heads. Digitalized models and the corresponding lateral cephalograms were superimposed for planning the OMI positions, and tooth-supported (TS) and soft-tissue-supported (STS) templates were manufactured. Thereafter, postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed, and the straight (A) and right-angle distance (B) from the implant tip to the nasal floor, the distance from the implant shoulder to the hard palate (C) and the angle (α) between the implant and palate plane with the preoperative (T0) and postoperative (T1) positions were measured. RESULTS: The postoperative distances A, B, and C were less than the planned implant positions. However, significant difference between T0 and T1 was only noted in terms of distance A using the TS templates (T0: 4.7 ± 2.3 mm, T1: 3.0 ± 2.3 mm; p = 0.008) and distance B using the STS template (T0: 3.1 ± 3.5 mm, T1: 2.3 ± 3.2 mm; p = 0.041). There were no significant differences in all average deviations (∆ Ceph/CBCT) between the two templates. CONCLUSIONS: Guided OMI placement planned by virtual superimposition of digitized models and the corresponding lateral cephalogram is fundamentally feasible. However, the position closer to the nasal floor needs critical assessment for correct implantation. The silicone template expansion seems to have only a minor effect on transfer accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7442770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74427702020-08-24 Suitability of virtual plaster models superimposed with the lateral cephalogram for guided paramedian orthodontic mini-implant placement with regard to the bone support Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian Brandt, Maximilian Kniha, Kristian Bock, Anna Prescher, Andreas Hölzle, Frank Modabber, Ali Danesh, Golamreza J Orofac Orthop Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to evaluate the precision of guided orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) placement planned on virtual superimposition of plaster models and lateral cephalograms with regard to the bone support and, second, to investigate the effects of silicone guide extension. METHODS: A total of 40 OMIs were placed in the paramedian area of the anterior palates of 20 cadaver heads. Digitalized models and the corresponding lateral cephalograms were superimposed for planning the OMI positions, and tooth-supported (TS) and soft-tissue-supported (STS) templates were manufactured. Thereafter, postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed, and the straight (A) and right-angle distance (B) from the implant tip to the nasal floor, the distance from the implant shoulder to the hard palate (C) and the angle (α) between the implant and palate plane with the preoperative (T0) and postoperative (T1) positions were measured. RESULTS: The postoperative distances A, B, and C were less than the planned implant positions. However, significant difference between T0 and T1 was only noted in terms of distance A using the TS templates (T0: 4.7 ± 2.3 mm, T1: 3.0 ± 2.3 mm; p = 0.008) and distance B using the STS template (T0: 3.1 ± 3.5 mm, T1: 2.3 ± 3.2 mm; p = 0.041). There were no significant differences in all average deviations (∆ Ceph/CBCT) between the two templates. CONCLUSIONS: Guided OMI placement planned by virtual superimposition of digitized models and the corresponding lateral cephalogram is fundamentally feasible. However, the position closer to the nasal floor needs critical assessment for correct implantation. The silicone template expansion seems to have only a minor effect on transfer accuracy. Springer Medizin 2020-07-06 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7442770/ /pubmed/32632653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-020-00238-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian
Brandt, Maximilian
Kniha, Kristian
Bock, Anna
Prescher, Andreas
Hölzle, Frank
Modabber, Ali
Danesh, Golamreza
Suitability of virtual plaster models superimposed with the lateral cephalogram for guided paramedian orthodontic mini-implant placement with regard to the bone support
title Suitability of virtual plaster models superimposed with the lateral cephalogram for guided paramedian orthodontic mini-implant placement with regard to the bone support
title_full Suitability of virtual plaster models superimposed with the lateral cephalogram for guided paramedian orthodontic mini-implant placement with regard to the bone support
title_fullStr Suitability of virtual plaster models superimposed with the lateral cephalogram for guided paramedian orthodontic mini-implant placement with regard to the bone support
title_full_unstemmed Suitability of virtual plaster models superimposed with the lateral cephalogram for guided paramedian orthodontic mini-implant placement with regard to the bone support
title_short Suitability of virtual plaster models superimposed with the lateral cephalogram for guided paramedian orthodontic mini-implant placement with regard to the bone support
title_sort suitability of virtual plaster models superimposed with the lateral cephalogram for guided paramedian orthodontic mini-implant placement with regard to the bone support
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-020-00238-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mohlhenrichstephanchristian suitabilityofvirtualplastermodelssuperimposedwiththelateralcephalogramforguidedparamedianorthodonticminiimplantplacementwithregardtothebonesupport
AT brandtmaximilian suitabilityofvirtualplastermodelssuperimposedwiththelateralcephalogramforguidedparamedianorthodonticminiimplantplacementwithregardtothebonesupport
AT knihakristian suitabilityofvirtualplastermodelssuperimposedwiththelateralcephalogramforguidedparamedianorthodonticminiimplantplacementwithregardtothebonesupport
AT bockanna suitabilityofvirtualplastermodelssuperimposedwiththelateralcephalogramforguidedparamedianorthodonticminiimplantplacementwithregardtothebonesupport
AT prescherandreas suitabilityofvirtualplastermodelssuperimposedwiththelateralcephalogramforguidedparamedianorthodonticminiimplantplacementwithregardtothebonesupport
AT holzlefrank suitabilityofvirtualplastermodelssuperimposedwiththelateralcephalogramforguidedparamedianorthodonticminiimplantplacementwithregardtothebonesupport
AT modabberali suitabilityofvirtualplastermodelssuperimposedwiththelateralcephalogramforguidedparamedianorthodonticminiimplantplacementwithregardtothebonesupport
AT daneshgolamreza suitabilityofvirtualplastermodelssuperimposedwiththelateralcephalogramforguidedparamedianorthodonticminiimplantplacementwithregardtothebonesupport