Cargando…

Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for biogas production from high moisture municipal solid waste

BACKGROUND: Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a suitable process for treating high moisture MSW with biogas and biofertilizer production. However, the low stability of AD performance and low methane production results from high moisture MSW due to the fast acidify of carbohydrate fermentation. The effects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markphan, Wattananarong, Mamimin, Chonticha, Suksong, Wantanasak, Prasertsan, Poonsuk, O-Thong, Sompong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7443091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32879796
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9693
_version_ 1783573565213245440
author Markphan, Wattananarong
Mamimin, Chonticha
Suksong, Wantanasak
Prasertsan, Poonsuk
O-Thong, Sompong
author_facet Markphan, Wattananarong
Mamimin, Chonticha
Suksong, Wantanasak
Prasertsan, Poonsuk
O-Thong, Sompong
author_sort Markphan, Wattananarong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a suitable process for treating high moisture MSW with biogas and biofertilizer production. However, the low stability of AD performance and low methane production results from high moisture MSW due to the fast acidify of carbohydrate fermentation. The effects of organic loading and incineration fly ash addition as a pH adjustment on methane production from high moisture MSW in the single-stage AD and two-stage AD processes were investigated. RESULTS: Suitable initial organic loading of the single-stage AD process was 17 gVS L(−1) at incineration fly ash (IFA) addition of 0.5% with methane yield of 287 mL CH(4) g(−1) VS. Suitable initial organic loading of the two-stage AD process was 43 gVS L(−1) at IFA addition of 1% with hydrogen and methane yield of 47.4 ml H(2) g(−1) VS and 363 mL CH(4) g(−1) VS, respectively. The highest hydrogen and methane production of 8.7 m(3) H(2) ton(−1) of high moisture MSW and 66.6 m(3) CH(4) ton(−1) of high moisture MSW was achieved at organic loading of 43 gVS L(−1) at IFA addition of 1% by two-stage AD process. Biogas production by the two-stage AD process enabled 18.5% higher energy recovery than single-stage AD. The 1% addition of IFA into high moisture MSW was useful for controlling pH of the two-stage AD process with enhanced biogas production between 87–92% when compared to without IFA addition. Electricity production and energy recovery from MSW using the coupled incineration with biogas production by two-stage AD process were 9,874 MJ ton(−1) MSW and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The two-stage AD process with IFA addition for pH adjustment could improve biogas production from high moisture MSW, as well as reduce lag phase and enhance biodegradability efficiency. The coupled incineration process with biogas production using the two-stage AD process was suitable for the management of MSW with low area requirement, low greenhouse gas emissions, and high energy recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7443091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74430912020-09-01 Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for biogas production from high moisture municipal solid waste Markphan, Wattananarong Mamimin, Chonticha Suksong, Wantanasak Prasertsan, Poonsuk O-Thong, Sompong PeerJ Microbiology BACKGROUND: Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a suitable process for treating high moisture MSW with biogas and biofertilizer production. However, the low stability of AD performance and low methane production results from high moisture MSW due to the fast acidify of carbohydrate fermentation. The effects of organic loading and incineration fly ash addition as a pH adjustment on methane production from high moisture MSW in the single-stage AD and two-stage AD processes were investigated. RESULTS: Suitable initial organic loading of the single-stage AD process was 17 gVS L(−1) at incineration fly ash (IFA) addition of 0.5% with methane yield of 287 mL CH(4) g(−1) VS. Suitable initial organic loading of the two-stage AD process was 43 gVS L(−1) at IFA addition of 1% with hydrogen and methane yield of 47.4 ml H(2) g(−1) VS and 363 mL CH(4) g(−1) VS, respectively. The highest hydrogen and methane production of 8.7 m(3) H(2) ton(−1) of high moisture MSW and 66.6 m(3) CH(4) ton(−1) of high moisture MSW was achieved at organic loading of 43 gVS L(−1) at IFA addition of 1% by two-stage AD process. Biogas production by the two-stage AD process enabled 18.5% higher energy recovery than single-stage AD. The 1% addition of IFA into high moisture MSW was useful for controlling pH of the two-stage AD process with enhanced biogas production between 87–92% when compared to without IFA addition. Electricity production and energy recovery from MSW using the coupled incineration with biogas production by two-stage AD process were 9,874 MJ ton(−1) MSW and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The two-stage AD process with IFA addition for pH adjustment could improve biogas production from high moisture MSW, as well as reduce lag phase and enhance biodegradability efficiency. The coupled incineration process with biogas production using the two-stage AD process was suitable for the management of MSW with low area requirement, low greenhouse gas emissions, and high energy recovery. PeerJ Inc. 2020-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7443091/ /pubmed/32879796 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9693 Text en ©2020 Markphan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Markphan, Wattananarong
Mamimin, Chonticha
Suksong, Wantanasak
Prasertsan, Poonsuk
O-Thong, Sompong
Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for biogas production from high moisture municipal solid waste
title Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for biogas production from high moisture municipal solid waste
title_full Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for biogas production from high moisture municipal solid waste
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for biogas production from high moisture municipal solid waste
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for biogas production from high moisture municipal solid waste
title_short Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for biogas production from high moisture municipal solid waste
title_sort comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for biogas production from high moisture municipal solid waste
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7443091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32879796
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9693
work_keys_str_mv AT markphanwattananarong comparativeassessmentofsinglestageandtwostageanaerobicdigestionforbiogasproductionfromhighmoisturemunicipalsolidwaste
AT mamiminchonticha comparativeassessmentofsinglestageandtwostageanaerobicdigestionforbiogasproductionfromhighmoisturemunicipalsolidwaste
AT suksongwantanasak comparativeassessmentofsinglestageandtwostageanaerobicdigestionforbiogasproductionfromhighmoisturemunicipalsolidwaste
AT prasertsanpoonsuk comparativeassessmentofsinglestageandtwostageanaerobicdigestionforbiogasproductionfromhighmoisturemunicipalsolidwaste
AT othongsompong comparativeassessmentofsinglestageandtwostageanaerobicdigestionforbiogasproductionfromhighmoisturemunicipalsolidwaste