Cargando…

High-dose versus low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review evidence comparing the effect of low-dose versus high-dose ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation, functional capacity and side effects in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Migliavaca, Celina Borges, Stein, Cinara, Colpani, Verônica, Eibel, Bruna, Bgeginski, Roberta, Simões, Marcus Vinicius, Rohde, Luiz Eduardo, Falavigna, Maicon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7443275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32820054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001228
_version_ 1783573602162966528
author Migliavaca, Celina Borges
Stein, Cinara
Colpani, Verônica
Eibel, Bruna
Bgeginski, Roberta
Simões, Marcus Vinicius
Rohde, Luiz Eduardo
Falavigna, Maicon
author_facet Migliavaca, Celina Borges
Stein, Cinara
Colpani, Verônica
Eibel, Bruna
Bgeginski, Roberta
Simões, Marcus Vinicius
Rohde, Luiz Eduardo
Falavigna, Maicon
author_sort Migliavaca, Celina Borges
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To systematically review evidence comparing the effect of low-dose versus high-dose ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation, functional capacity and side effects in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and LILACS up to January 2019. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing low-dose versus high-dose ACEIs in adults with HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2.0, and quality of evidence with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). We conducted random effects meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. RESULTS: We included eight RCTs (5829 patients with HF). In comparison with low-dose ACEIs, high-dose ACEIs showed a non-significant effect on all-cause mortality (8 RCTs, n=5828, relative risk (RR) 0.95, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.02; moderate quality of evidence), cardiovascular mortality (6 RCTs, n=4048, RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.01; moderate quality of evidence), all-cause hospitalisation (5 RCTs, n=5394, RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.10; moderate quality of evidence) and cardiovascular hospitalisation (4 RCTs, n=5242, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.17; low quality of evidence). High-dose ACEI increased functional capacity (4 studies, n=555, standardised mean difference 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.55; low quality of evidence) and the risk of hypotension (4 RCTs, n=3783, RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.05; moderate quality of evidence). High-dose ACEI had no effect on dizziness (3 RCTs, n=4994, RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.93; low quality of evidence), but decreased the risk of cough (4 RCTs, n=5146, RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.98; moderate quality of evidence). CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of benefit of using high dose versus low to intermediate doses of ACEIs might be less than traditionally suggested in clinical guidelines. These findings might help clinicians address the complex task of HF management in a more rational and timely fashion, saving efforts to implement strategies with the greatest net clinical benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7443275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74432752020-08-28 High-dose versus low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis Migliavaca, Celina Borges Stein, Cinara Colpani, Verônica Eibel, Bruna Bgeginski, Roberta Simões, Marcus Vinicius Rohde, Luiz Eduardo Falavigna, Maicon Open Heart Meta-Analysis OBJECTIVE: To systematically review evidence comparing the effect of low-dose versus high-dose ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation, functional capacity and side effects in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and LILACS up to January 2019. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing low-dose versus high-dose ACEIs in adults with HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2.0, and quality of evidence with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). We conducted random effects meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. RESULTS: We included eight RCTs (5829 patients with HF). In comparison with low-dose ACEIs, high-dose ACEIs showed a non-significant effect on all-cause mortality (8 RCTs, n=5828, relative risk (RR) 0.95, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.02; moderate quality of evidence), cardiovascular mortality (6 RCTs, n=4048, RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.01; moderate quality of evidence), all-cause hospitalisation (5 RCTs, n=5394, RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.10; moderate quality of evidence) and cardiovascular hospitalisation (4 RCTs, n=5242, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.17; low quality of evidence). High-dose ACEI increased functional capacity (4 studies, n=555, standardised mean difference 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.55; low quality of evidence) and the risk of hypotension (4 RCTs, n=3783, RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.05; moderate quality of evidence). High-dose ACEI had no effect on dizziness (3 RCTs, n=4994, RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.93; low quality of evidence), but decreased the risk of cough (4 RCTs, n=5146, RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.98; moderate quality of evidence). CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of benefit of using high dose versus low to intermediate doses of ACEIs might be less than traditionally suggested in clinical guidelines. These findings might help clinicians address the complex task of HF management in a more rational and timely fashion, saving efforts to implement strategies with the greatest net clinical benefit. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7443275/ /pubmed/32820054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001228 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Migliavaca, Celina Borges
Stein, Cinara
Colpani, Verônica
Eibel, Bruna
Bgeginski, Roberta
Simões, Marcus Vinicius
Rohde, Luiz Eduardo
Falavigna, Maicon
High-dose versus low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
title High-dose versus low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full High-dose versus low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr High-dose versus low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed High-dose versus low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short High-dose versus low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort high-dose versus low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7443275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32820054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001228
work_keys_str_mv AT migliavacacelinaborges highdoseversuslowdoseangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsinheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT steincinara highdoseversuslowdoseangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsinheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT colpaniveronica highdoseversuslowdoseangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsinheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eibelbruna highdoseversuslowdoseangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsinheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bgeginskiroberta highdoseversuslowdoseangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsinheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT simoesmarcusvinicius highdoseversuslowdoseangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsinheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rohdeluizeduardo highdoseversuslowdoseangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsinheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT falavignamaicon highdoseversuslowdoseangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsinheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis