Cargando…

Trunk muscle activity during pressure feedback monitoring among individuals with and without chronic low Back pain

BACKGROUND: Pressure biofeedback unit (PBU) is a widely used non-invasive device to assist core muscle training by providing pressure feedback. The aim this study was to compare the muscle activities of transverse abdominis (TA) and multifidus (MF) at different target pressures (50, 60 and 70 mmHg)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xin, Lo, Wai Leung Ambrose, Lu, Song-wei, Liu, Howe, Lin, Ke-yu, Lai, Jian-yang, Li, Le, Wang, Chu-huai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7443296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32828131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03565-y
_version_ 1783573606668697600
author Li, Xin
Lo, Wai Leung Ambrose
Lu, Song-wei
Liu, Howe
Lin, Ke-yu
Lai, Jian-yang
Li, Le
Wang, Chu-huai
author_facet Li, Xin
Lo, Wai Leung Ambrose
Lu, Song-wei
Liu, Howe
Lin, Ke-yu
Lai, Jian-yang
Li, Le
Wang, Chu-huai
author_sort Li, Xin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pressure biofeedback unit (PBU) is a widely used non-invasive device to assist core muscle training by providing pressure feedback. The aim this study was to compare the muscle activities of transverse abdominis (TA) and multifidus (MF) at different target pressures (50, 60 and 70 mmHg) of PBU between individuals with and without cLBP. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with chronic LBP (cLBP) and 24 age matched healthy individuals were recruited. Electromyography (EMG) signals were recorded from the TA and MF muscles while the TA and MF were contracted to achieve PBU pressure value of 50, 60 and 70 mmHg in random order. The average EMG amplitude (AEMG) of 3 replicate trials was used in the analysis after normalization to %MVIC. %MVIC is defined as the mean of the three AEMG divided by the AEMG of MVIC. Two-way ANOVA was performed to assess the effects of groups (healthy and cLBP) and the three different target pressures of PBU. Independent sample t-test was conducted to compare between the two groups. Spearman’s correlation analysis was performed in the cLBP group to determine potential correlations between EMG activity, NPRS and ODI. RESULTS: The %MVIC of the TA and MF in the cLBP group were higher than the control group at each pressure value (P<0.05). During maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of TA and MF, compared with healthy groups, cLBP subjects showed a decrease (TA mean = 47.61 μV; MF mean = 42.40 μV) in EMG amplitudes (P ≤ 0.001). The MVIC of MF was negatively correlated with Numerical Pain Rating Scale (r = − 0.48, P = 0.024) and Oswestry Disability Index (r = − 0.59, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: We measured the trunk muscles activities at different PBU pressure values, which allows the individual to estimate trunk muscle contraction via PBU. Clinicians may be able to confer the data obtained through EMG recordings to adjust the exercise intensity of PBU training accordingly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7443296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74432962020-08-25 Trunk muscle activity during pressure feedback monitoring among individuals with and without chronic low Back pain Li, Xin Lo, Wai Leung Ambrose Lu, Song-wei Liu, Howe Lin, Ke-yu Lai, Jian-yang Li, Le Wang, Chu-huai BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Pressure biofeedback unit (PBU) is a widely used non-invasive device to assist core muscle training by providing pressure feedback. The aim this study was to compare the muscle activities of transverse abdominis (TA) and multifidus (MF) at different target pressures (50, 60 and 70 mmHg) of PBU between individuals with and without cLBP. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with chronic LBP (cLBP) and 24 age matched healthy individuals were recruited. Electromyography (EMG) signals were recorded from the TA and MF muscles while the TA and MF were contracted to achieve PBU pressure value of 50, 60 and 70 mmHg in random order. The average EMG amplitude (AEMG) of 3 replicate trials was used in the analysis after normalization to %MVIC. %MVIC is defined as the mean of the three AEMG divided by the AEMG of MVIC. Two-way ANOVA was performed to assess the effects of groups (healthy and cLBP) and the three different target pressures of PBU. Independent sample t-test was conducted to compare between the two groups. Spearman’s correlation analysis was performed in the cLBP group to determine potential correlations between EMG activity, NPRS and ODI. RESULTS: The %MVIC of the TA and MF in the cLBP group were higher than the control group at each pressure value (P<0.05). During maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of TA and MF, compared with healthy groups, cLBP subjects showed a decrease (TA mean = 47.61 μV; MF mean = 42.40 μV) in EMG amplitudes (P ≤ 0.001). The MVIC of MF was negatively correlated with Numerical Pain Rating Scale (r = − 0.48, P = 0.024) and Oswestry Disability Index (r = − 0.59, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: We measured the trunk muscles activities at different PBU pressure values, which allows the individual to estimate trunk muscle contraction via PBU. Clinicians may be able to confer the data obtained through EMG recordings to adjust the exercise intensity of PBU training accordingly. BioMed Central 2020-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7443296/ /pubmed/32828131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03565-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Xin
Lo, Wai Leung Ambrose
Lu, Song-wei
Liu, Howe
Lin, Ke-yu
Lai, Jian-yang
Li, Le
Wang, Chu-huai
Trunk muscle activity during pressure feedback monitoring among individuals with and without chronic low Back pain
title Trunk muscle activity during pressure feedback monitoring among individuals with and without chronic low Back pain
title_full Trunk muscle activity during pressure feedback monitoring among individuals with and without chronic low Back pain
title_fullStr Trunk muscle activity during pressure feedback monitoring among individuals with and without chronic low Back pain
title_full_unstemmed Trunk muscle activity during pressure feedback monitoring among individuals with and without chronic low Back pain
title_short Trunk muscle activity during pressure feedback monitoring among individuals with and without chronic low Back pain
title_sort trunk muscle activity during pressure feedback monitoring among individuals with and without chronic low back pain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7443296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32828131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03565-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lixin trunkmuscleactivityduringpressurefeedbackmonitoringamongindividualswithandwithoutchroniclowbackpain
AT lowaileungambrose trunkmuscleactivityduringpressurefeedbackmonitoringamongindividualswithandwithoutchroniclowbackpain
AT lusongwei trunkmuscleactivityduringpressurefeedbackmonitoringamongindividualswithandwithoutchroniclowbackpain
AT liuhowe trunkmuscleactivityduringpressurefeedbackmonitoringamongindividualswithandwithoutchroniclowbackpain
AT linkeyu trunkmuscleactivityduringpressurefeedbackmonitoringamongindividualswithandwithoutchroniclowbackpain
AT laijianyang trunkmuscleactivityduringpressurefeedbackmonitoringamongindividualswithandwithoutchroniclowbackpain
AT lile trunkmuscleactivityduringpressurefeedbackmonitoringamongindividualswithandwithoutchroniclowbackpain
AT wangchuhuai trunkmuscleactivityduringpressurefeedbackmonitoringamongindividualswithandwithoutchroniclowbackpain