Cargando…

Effects of instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization at three different application angles on hamstring surface thermal responses

[Purpose] This study aimed to examine the thermal skin responses (thermal buildup and retention rate) to instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) procedures applied on hamstrings at different angles. [Participants and Methods] Thirty university students (age: 20 ± 4 years, weight: 70.61...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fousekis, Konstantinos, Varda, Chariκleia, Mandalidis, Dimitris, Mylonas, Konstantinos, Angelopoulos, Pavlos, Koumoundourou, Dimitra, Tsepis, Elias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7443544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32884171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.506
_version_ 1783573650292604928
author Fousekis, Konstantinos
Varda, Chariκleia
Mandalidis, Dimitris
Mylonas, Konstantinos
Angelopoulos, Pavlos
Koumoundourou, Dimitra
Tsepis, Elias
author_facet Fousekis, Konstantinos
Varda, Chariκleia
Mandalidis, Dimitris
Mylonas, Konstantinos
Angelopoulos, Pavlos
Koumoundourou, Dimitra
Tsepis, Elias
author_sort Fousekis, Konstantinos
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] This study aimed to examine the thermal skin responses (thermal buildup and retention rate) to instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) procedures applied on hamstrings at different angles. [Participants and Methods] Thirty university students (age: 20 ± 4 years, weight: 70.61 ± 9.11 kg, height: 168.5 ± 7.5 cm) received three sessions of 10-min Ergon(®) IASTM treatment on their dominant limbs’ hamstrings at 20°, 60°, and 90° application angles, respectively. The skin temperature was measured with a thermometer immediately before and after treatment, and every minute thereafter until it returned to the baseline value. [Results] IASTM resulted in a significant increase in skin temperature irrespective of the application angle. The thermal retention rate produced by the treatment at a 90° angle was significantly higher than that produced by the 20° application angle (78.9 vs. 64.53 min). No significant differences were observed between the 60° and 90° angle applications (72.5 vs. 78.9 min). [Conclusion] IASTM application at 60° and 90° angles can increase and retain the hamstring’s skin temperature for more than an hour, creating the conditions for potential positive adaptations to local metabolism and muscle tone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7443544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74435442020-09-02 Effects of instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization at three different application angles on hamstring surface thermal responses Fousekis, Konstantinos Varda, Chariκleia Mandalidis, Dimitris Mylonas, Konstantinos Angelopoulos, Pavlos Koumoundourou, Dimitra Tsepis, Elias J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] This study aimed to examine the thermal skin responses (thermal buildup and retention rate) to instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) procedures applied on hamstrings at different angles. [Participants and Methods] Thirty university students (age: 20 ± 4 years, weight: 70.61 ± 9.11 kg, height: 168.5 ± 7.5 cm) received three sessions of 10-min Ergon(®) IASTM treatment on their dominant limbs’ hamstrings at 20°, 60°, and 90° application angles, respectively. The skin temperature was measured with a thermometer immediately before and after treatment, and every minute thereafter until it returned to the baseline value. [Results] IASTM resulted in a significant increase in skin temperature irrespective of the application angle. The thermal retention rate produced by the treatment at a 90° angle was significantly higher than that produced by the 20° application angle (78.9 vs. 64.53 min). No significant differences were observed between the 60° and 90° angle applications (72.5 vs. 78.9 min). [Conclusion] IASTM application at 60° and 90° angles can increase and retain the hamstring’s skin temperature for more than an hour, creating the conditions for potential positive adaptations to local metabolism and muscle tone. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2020-08-08 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7443544/ /pubmed/32884171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.506 Text en 2020©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Fousekis, Konstantinos
Varda, Chariκleia
Mandalidis, Dimitris
Mylonas, Konstantinos
Angelopoulos, Pavlos
Koumoundourou, Dimitra
Tsepis, Elias
Effects of instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization at three different application angles on hamstring surface thermal responses
title Effects of instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization at three different application angles on hamstring surface thermal responses
title_full Effects of instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization at three different application angles on hamstring surface thermal responses
title_fullStr Effects of instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization at three different application angles on hamstring surface thermal responses
title_full_unstemmed Effects of instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization at three different application angles on hamstring surface thermal responses
title_short Effects of instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization at three different application angles on hamstring surface thermal responses
title_sort effects of instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization at three different application angles on hamstring surface thermal responses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7443544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32884171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.506
work_keys_str_mv AT fousekiskonstantinos effectsofinstrumentassistedsofttissuemobilizationatthreedifferentapplicationanglesonhamstringsurfacethermalresponses
AT vardacharikleia effectsofinstrumentassistedsofttissuemobilizationatthreedifferentapplicationanglesonhamstringsurfacethermalresponses
AT mandalidisdimitris effectsofinstrumentassistedsofttissuemobilizationatthreedifferentapplicationanglesonhamstringsurfacethermalresponses
AT mylonaskonstantinos effectsofinstrumentassistedsofttissuemobilizationatthreedifferentapplicationanglesonhamstringsurfacethermalresponses
AT angelopoulospavlos effectsofinstrumentassistedsofttissuemobilizationatthreedifferentapplicationanglesonhamstringsurfacethermalresponses
AT koumoundouroudimitra effectsofinstrumentassistedsofttissuemobilizationatthreedifferentapplicationanglesonhamstringsurfacethermalresponses
AT tsepiselias effectsofinstrumentassistedsofttissuemobilizationatthreedifferentapplicationanglesonhamstringsurfacethermalresponses