Cargando…

The comparative performance of DBS artefact rejection methods for MEG recordings

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be a very efficient treatment option for movement disorders and psychiatric diseases. To better understand DBS mechanisms, brain activity can be recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG) with the stimulator turned on. However, DBS produces large artefacts compromis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kandemir, Ahmet Levent, Litvak, Vladimir, Florin, Esther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7443703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32540355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117057
_version_ 1783573677020807168
author Kandemir, Ahmet Levent
Litvak, Vladimir
Florin, Esther
author_facet Kandemir, Ahmet Levent
Litvak, Vladimir
Florin, Esther
author_sort Kandemir, Ahmet Levent
collection PubMed
description Deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be a very efficient treatment option for movement disorders and psychiatric diseases. To better understand DBS mechanisms, brain activity can be recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG) with the stimulator turned on. However, DBS produces large artefacts compromising MEG data quality due to both the applied current and the movement of wires connecting the stimulator with the electrode. To filter out these artefacts, several methods to suppress the DBS artefact have been proposed in the literature. A comparative study evaluating each method’s effectiveness, however, is missing so far. In this study, we evaluate the performance of four artefact rejection methods on MEG data from phantom recordings with DBS acquired with an Elekta Neuromag and a CTF system: (i) Hampel-filter, (ii) spectral signal space projection (S3P), (iii) independent component analysis with mutual information (ICA-MI), and (iv) temporal signal space separation (tSSS). In the sensor space, the largest increase in signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio was achieved by ICA-MI, while the best correspondence in terms of source activations was obtained by tSSS. LCMV beamforming alone was not sufficient to suppress the DBS-induced artefacts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7443703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74437032020-10-01 The comparative performance of DBS artefact rejection methods for MEG recordings Kandemir, Ahmet Levent Litvak, Vladimir Florin, Esther Neuroimage Article Deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be a very efficient treatment option for movement disorders and psychiatric diseases. To better understand DBS mechanisms, brain activity can be recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG) with the stimulator turned on. However, DBS produces large artefacts compromising MEG data quality due to both the applied current and the movement of wires connecting the stimulator with the electrode. To filter out these artefacts, several methods to suppress the DBS artefact have been proposed in the literature. A comparative study evaluating each method’s effectiveness, however, is missing so far. In this study, we evaluate the performance of four artefact rejection methods on MEG data from phantom recordings with DBS acquired with an Elekta Neuromag and a CTF system: (i) Hampel-filter, (ii) spectral signal space projection (S3P), (iii) independent component analysis with mutual information (ICA-MI), and (iv) temporal signal space separation (tSSS). In the sensor space, the largest increase in signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio was achieved by ICA-MI, while the best correspondence in terms of source activations was obtained by tSSS. LCMV beamforming alone was not sufficient to suppress the DBS-induced artefacts. Academic Press 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7443703/ /pubmed/32540355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117057 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kandemir, Ahmet Levent
Litvak, Vladimir
Florin, Esther
The comparative performance of DBS artefact rejection methods for MEG recordings
title The comparative performance of DBS artefact rejection methods for MEG recordings
title_full The comparative performance of DBS artefact rejection methods for MEG recordings
title_fullStr The comparative performance of DBS artefact rejection methods for MEG recordings
title_full_unstemmed The comparative performance of DBS artefact rejection methods for MEG recordings
title_short The comparative performance of DBS artefact rejection methods for MEG recordings
title_sort comparative performance of dbs artefact rejection methods for meg recordings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7443703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32540355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117057
work_keys_str_mv AT kandemirahmetlevent thecomparativeperformanceofdbsartefactrejectionmethodsformegrecordings
AT litvakvladimir thecomparativeperformanceofdbsartefactrejectionmethodsformegrecordings
AT florinesther thecomparativeperformanceofdbsartefactrejectionmethodsformegrecordings
AT kandemirahmetlevent comparativeperformanceofdbsartefactrejectionmethodsformegrecordings
AT litvakvladimir comparativeperformanceofdbsartefactrejectionmethodsformegrecordings
AT florinesther comparativeperformanceofdbsartefactrejectionmethodsformegrecordings